CX Possible Acquisition - HK Express
#16
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: SYD | HGH
Programs: CX DM, Hyatt Globalist, Hilton DM, Marriott Plat
Posts: 2,121
So maybe CX elites can use lounges when flying HK Express?
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,545
What is noteworthy is that CX did not confirm that it was in active discussions regarding Hong Kong Airline (HX).
#18
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX DM, JGC Sapphire, FWC Gold
Posts: 329
#19
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Cathay Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 688
Slosar is the outgoing Chairman and I believe will be gone this year and perhaps that is a good thing having in the past years made some questionable calls i.e. the past CEO.
Under his stewardship Cathay stagnated and many service levels declined. Perhaps accountants should not run airlines?
Cathay has for the past 10 years or so looked at the pros and cons of establishing a low cost airline and clearly preferred to position itself (and Dragon) as a full service airline group that can also fight with low cost carriers when it needs to.
That position may have changed and if they were to take a controlling equity interest in HK Express I believe they would seek to acquire them 100% long term as to fiddle at the edges with a minority shareholding would seem to make little commercial sense.
Cathay unlike Singapore Airlines operates on separate Airline Operators licences for Cathay and Dragon i.e separate entities. With any HK Express acciquision Cathey would have a third valuable Air Operators Licence. as well as the valuable slots.
There are substantial advantages between starting a low cost carrier against buying one already up and running at perhaps a knock down price.
Under his stewardship Cathay stagnated and many service levels declined. Perhaps accountants should not run airlines?
Cathay has for the past 10 years or so looked at the pros and cons of establishing a low cost airline and clearly preferred to position itself (and Dragon) as a full service airline group that can also fight with low cost carriers when it needs to.
That position may have changed and if they were to take a controlling equity interest in HK Express I believe they would seek to acquire them 100% long term as to fiddle at the edges with a minority shareholding would seem to make little commercial sense.
Cathay unlike Singapore Airlines operates on separate Airline Operators licences for Cathay and Dragon i.e separate entities. With any HK Express acciquision Cathey would have a third valuable Air Operators Licence. as well as the valuable slots.
There are substantial advantages between starting a low cost carrier against buying one already up and running at perhaps a knock down price.
#20
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Silver (OWS)
Posts: 654
Anyone know if HK express is profitable?
Doubt CX are only interested in slots - the lower salary base will be an attraction, for example.
Doubt CX are only interested in slots - the lower salary base will be an attraction, for example.
#21
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Cathay Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 688
'Anyone know if HK express is profitable?"
It is not - large losses due mostly to catastrophic management.
Being a private company little info is in the public domain though.
It is not - large losses due mostly to catastrophic management.
Being a private company little info is in the public domain though.
#22
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,545
#23
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 121
Perhaps a defensive to move so the likes of Qantas/Jetstar don’t get a foot in the door in HKG?
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,545
#25
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BA Silver (OWS)
Posts: 654
Profitable in 2015 and first half of 2016 apparently - https://static.hkexpress.com/media/1...-july-en_1.pdf
A cursory search didn't reveal anything more recent.
A cursory search didn't reveal anything more recent.
#26
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: HKG • Ex SFO, NYC
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP; Marriott Amb; Hyatt Globalist; Shangri-la Diamond; IHG SpireAmb; Hilton D; Accor G
Posts: 3,319
I certainly hope this doesn't happen.
Cathay Dragon is a full service airline with very good service. They have good business class, and some of the best service in economy I've ever had. It's just as good as CX.
If CX acquires HK Express, I could see them replacing KA routes with UO, which would be a huge downgrade.
Cathay Dragon is a full service airline with very good service. They have good business class, and some of the best service in economy I've ever had. It's just as good as CX.
If CX acquires HK Express, I could see them replacing KA routes with UO, which would be a huge downgrade.
#27
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: MP, BR
Posts: 375
What salary are you referring to? My understanding is that at least for the FA, salary is comparable and UO flights are actually quite pleasant to work with - passengers have to pay extra for almost anything (and thus never request things) and complaining gets them nowhere.
#29
Join Date: Jan 2014
Programs: CX Diamond, United MileagePlus Gold, Accor Platinum
Posts: 90
Like it or not, I found KA's service is highly inconsistent. Service has been minimal in recent years, particularly on popular routes e.g. KUL and PVG (crew members always claim on the online platforms that they are too busy on these popular short-haul flights). I personally don't mind travelling to Xiaman, Danang, Haikou alike with UO-alike service - I don't mind skipping that Chinese cookie and a cup of water with a lower fare. But there should be options on the flight, like Club Points-accountable for higher classes. You may choose between cost and membership.
#30
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
Like it or not, I found KA's service is highly inconsistent. Service has been minimal in recent years, particularly on popular routes e.g. KUL and PVG (crew members always claim on the online platforms that they are too busy on these popular short-haul flights). I personally don't mind travelling to Xiaman, Danang, Haikou alike with UO-alike service - I don't mind skipping that Chinese cookie and a cup of water with a lower fare. But there should be options on the flight, like Club Points-accountable for higher classes. You may choose between cost and membership.
I am just frequently reminded how much the soft product, and catering in particular (not just quality, but quality + enough meals loaded + significant variety) matter when I fly on KA. I could overlook the awful RBC seat if the food were good. Or maybe the inverse if the seat were nice. But none of it is.
I really thought highly of KA catering years back. They would especially go over the top to PEK and PVG. It was a no brainier to pick KA on those routes and leave CX to all the partner redeemers who didn't know any better. Not anymore.