Possible goodbye soon to low fuel surcharges from Hong Kong?
#16
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 384
No, in fact ajelonard: what the Hong Kong's aviation regulator has done is pass on the power to add/remove fuel surcharges over to the airlines. It is now up to the airlines to collect/add/remove fuel surcharges - and no longer in the government's hands.
Therefore, with current oil prices where they are, it is actually inevitable airfares will go up on cash bookings AND redemptions.
On the final price: that is a separate rule ordered by CAD to ensure pricing is transparent and that passengers know the full price at the first time of asking - not just the cost of the airfare
Therefore, with current oil prices where they are, it is actually inevitable airfares will go up on cash bookings AND redemptions.
On the final price: that is a separate rule ordered by CAD to ensure pricing is transparent and that passengers know the full price at the first time of asking - not just the cost of the airfare
#17
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chennai
Programs: Aeroplan, Marriott LTG, IHG Platinum
Posts: 209
If you price out from any airports in India to HKG vs from HKG to any airports in India, you will notice the difference.
#18
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 275
Unless you are talking premium cabins, seems that additional India GST is charged
#19
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW London and NW Sydney
Programs: BA Diamond, Hilton Bronze, A3 Diamond, IHG *G
Posts: 6,343
No, in fact ajelonard: what the Hong Kong's aviation regulator has done is pass on the power to add/remove fuel surcharges over to the airlines. It is now up to the airlines to collect/add/remove fuel surcharges - and no longer in the government's hands.
Therefore, with current oil prices where they are, it is actually inevitable airfares will go up on cash bookings AND redemptions.
Therefore, with current oil prices where they are, it is actually inevitable airfares will go up on cash bookings AND redemptions.
Before 2014(?):
Fare of $5000 can have a fuel surcharge of $500 added, but airlines can advertise their fare as $5000 and initial search results will show that amount.
2014-2015:
Fuel surcharges were capped at lower amounts. Nothing stopped the airline from changing the total price to $5400 fare + $100 fuel surcharge. However, the advertised price and initial search results would now have to show $5400.
2016-2018:
Airlines cannot label any part of their fare as fuel surcharge, but nothing stopped them from charging a fare of $5500 or raising it to $6000.
Fuel surcharge permitted:
Airlines can now relabel the $5500 fare as $3000 fare and $2500 fuel surcharge or $1 fare and $5499 fuel surcharge if they like. They can still raise the fare + surcharge to $7000 if they want to. But now they need to advertise the total price, including the $300 departure tax+airport construction fee + overseas taxes and fees.
The only thing that can change is redemptions, since the amount of fare covered by miles can now be reduced.
The total price for paid airfares remains subject to market forces. If an airline raises the price of a ticket from $5000 to $5500, then there will be a drop in demand whether they label it as $5500 fare or $5000 fare + $500 fuel surcharge. Unless you think HK consumers are so stupid that they will pay $500 more for the same thing just because it is called a fuel surcharge but they won't pay it if it is called the fare?? It's not like airlines were collecting fuel surcharges at check-in based on the current price of oil - it was always fixed at the time of booking.
If there is no drop in demand, then the airlines were stupid and should have raised fares earlier.
The SCMP article wasn't talking about award flights.
#20
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,773
Although the crowd here are both revenue and redemption passengers, you correctly pointed out there is negligble effect on the former, so the effect is on the latter.
Supposedly in the post-22/6 world CX is getting a lot more aggressive releasing redemption seats and being far more price discriminatory by more aggressive use of Choice/Tailored (cut the fiction Choice is available, it's usually just Tailored).
This rule change means we based in HK are going to pay more for redemptions. But will we get more seats for the higher prices we will be paying? I am doubful although I am reluctant to take bets on this here (cos in an online forum I have no idea how to collect on winnings).
If the "global trend of liberalisation of fuel surcharges to enhance competition" is true, competition will result in no additional profit to airlines from the change in rule; however with our slot-restricted airport, I do not have confidence there will be no adverse change to passengers.
Supposedly in the post-22/6 world CX is getting a lot more aggressive releasing redemption seats and being far more price discriminatory by more aggressive use of Choice/Tailored (cut the fiction Choice is available, it's usually just Tailored).
This rule change means we based in HK are going to pay more for redemptions. But will we get more seats for the higher prices we will be paying? I am doubful although I am reluctant to take bets on this here (cos in an online forum I have no idea how to collect on winnings).
If the "global trend of liberalisation of fuel surcharges to enhance competition" is true, competition will result in no additional profit to airlines from the change in rule; however with our slot-restricted airport, I do not have confidence there will be no adverse change to passengers.
#21
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Chennai
Programs: Aeroplan, Marriott LTG, IHG Platinum
Posts: 209
My bad...up thread there was a mention of CX redemption using BA Avios, I was under the assumption that you were saying about the same. I must have been specific.
#22
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,773
CX to apply new surcharges 2 Nov
https://www.cathaypacific.com/cx/en_...e-updates.html
Previous table: https://www.cathaypacific.com/cx/en_...-November.html
"No fuel surcharges apply for travel itineraries originating in Hong Kong SAR." wording has been removed
So $652 for long haul (x2), $210 for Japan (x2), $146 for other short haul (x2)
Previous table: https://www.cathaypacific.com/cx/en_...-November.html
"No fuel surcharges apply for travel itineraries originating in Hong Kong SAR." wording has been removed
So $652 for long haul (x2), $210 for Japan (x2), $146 for other short haul (x2)
#23
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,773
https://onemileatatime.com/lh-yq-increase/
Obviously about another airline. But you'd wonder whether Fuel Surcharge is a False Trade Description and whether Carrier Surcharge is more appropriate.
Obviously about another airline. But you'd wonder whether Fuel Surcharge is a False Trade Description and whether Carrier Surcharge is more appropriate.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2017
Programs: Cathay Pacific, Air Astana
Posts: 101
https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...set-cost-hk652
If this article is on the money, then CX seems to be re-introducing these surcharges first.
If this article is on the money, then CX seems to be re-introducing these surcharges first.
#26
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,773