Cabin crew don't care about GO anymore
#62
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: TPE, CGK
Programs: GFF Plat, CX DM, SQ TPPS, AS 75K
Posts: 199
#63
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver, Manila, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Hong Kong
Programs: CX-DM, Marriott Gold, Fairmont Premier
Posts: 335
#64
Suspended
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
#66
Join Date: Nov 2017
Programs: MPC-DM, Enrich-Plat
Posts: 1,310
If you earn enough points for the next level, you will be upgraded and your membership year will reset. Your membership year is not fixed. It changes every time you are upgraded to another tier. If you are already GO and earns between 600 and 1195 points (well, let's not talk about whether CX will make an exception for 1195 points), you get GO renewed for another year.
The reset itself would only delay the upgrade to the next level, not block the upgrades (correct me, if I am wrong).
Assuming CX-new-customer does immediately start with a flight intensity, resulting in 1200 points in one year, it would delay reaching the DM status with 9 months (being 3 months to become silver (300 points), then subsequently 600 points in 6 months to become gold, and then another year to get the 1200 points for DM) . All assuming the normal CX rules are followed (Am I correct with this ?).
From the CX perspective, I can understand the reset after upgrade to the next level, to avoid, CX grands DM status in a year and subsequently see this customer not fly CX, but still have 3 years of CX benefits, the lounge access (ie gradually degrading to green in the fourth year after reaching DM). That's not going to work out fine for CX.
When CX-new-customer starts regularly flying CX, this person quite likely did have a past flying history and probably reached a GO/DM equivalent elsewhere. Which opens the option for a status match request at CX, which, with several flights booked, may become GO. And from there, it's only a 1200 points to become DM. Referring the above example, the whole being just a few months longer then without reset-after-upgrade.
A yearly reset of accumulated points seems logical to me too, since what is relevant for CX, is the amount of flights per year, not accumulated over many years.
I myself experienced CX being pretty generous handing out GO status: Without signing up for MPC, I got invited for GO, with only 2.5 returns I/D class EU-BKK flown (with another 1.5 returns already booked, though). So who knows, what is possible.
Maybe we all should realize, the MPC is there to give a benefit to CX, through some (addictive) benefits (as less as possible) for the frequent flyer. No more, no less......
Feel free to correct again
Oh, and when flying J or higher, the SILVER/GOLD benefits are pretty low, given the perks that come with the flight class. Lounge invitation and overweight luggage (hauling around 50 kg!) might be interesting, that's about it.
#67
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TPE / HSZ
Programs: CX GO (=SPH), IHG Diamond Amb, Hertz 5*, Accor, Hilton, National
Posts: 6,437
Thank you for correcting me and let me stand corrected (though I didn't sort out immediate renewal aspect, I assume you are right).
The reset itself would only delay the upgrade to the next level, not block the upgrades (correct me, if I am wrong).
Assuming CX-new-customer does immediately start with a flight intensity, resulting in 1200 points in one year, it would delay reaching the DM status with 9 months (being 3 months to become silver (300 points), then subsequently 600 points in 6 months to become gold, and then another year to get the 1200 points for DM) . All assuming the normal CX rules are followed (Am I correct with this ?).
From the CX perspective, I can understand the reset after upgrade to the next level, to avoid, CX grands DM status in a year and subsequently see this customer not fly CX, but still have 3 years of CX benefits, the lounge access (ie gradually degrading to green in the fourth year after reaching DM). That's not going to work out fine for CX.
When CX-new-customer starts regularly flying CX, this person quite likely did have a past flying history and probably reached a GO/DM equivalent elsewhere. Which opens the option for a status match request at CX, which, with several flights booked, may become GO. And from there, it's only a 1200 points to become DM. Referring the above example, the whole being just a few months longer then without reset-after-upgrade.
A yearly reset of accumulated points seems logical to me too, since what is relevant for CX, is the amount of flights per year, not accumulated over many years.
I myself experienced CX being pretty generous handing out GO status: Without signing up for MPC, I got invited for GO, with only 2.5 returns I/D class EU-BKK flown (with another 1.5 returns already booked, though). So who knows, what is possible.
Maybe we all should realize, the MPC is there to give a benefit to CX, through some (addictive) benefits (as less as possible) for the frequent flyer. No more, no less......
Feel free to correct again
Oh, and when flying J or higher, the SILVER/GOLD benefits are pretty low, given the perks that come with the flight class. Lounge invitation and overweight luggage (hauling around 50 kg!) might be interesting, that's about it.
The reset itself would only delay the upgrade to the next level, not block the upgrades (correct me, if I am wrong).
Assuming CX-new-customer does immediately start with a flight intensity, resulting in 1200 points in one year, it would delay reaching the DM status with 9 months (being 3 months to become silver (300 points), then subsequently 600 points in 6 months to become gold, and then another year to get the 1200 points for DM) . All assuming the normal CX rules are followed (Am I correct with this ?).
From the CX perspective, I can understand the reset after upgrade to the next level, to avoid, CX grands DM status in a year and subsequently see this customer not fly CX, but still have 3 years of CX benefits, the lounge access (ie gradually degrading to green in the fourth year after reaching DM). That's not going to work out fine for CX.
When CX-new-customer starts regularly flying CX, this person quite likely did have a past flying history and probably reached a GO/DM equivalent elsewhere. Which opens the option for a status match request at CX, which, with several flights booked, may become GO. And from there, it's only a 1200 points to become DM. Referring the above example, the whole being just a few months longer then without reset-after-upgrade.
A yearly reset of accumulated points seems logical to me too, since what is relevant for CX, is the amount of flights per year, not accumulated over many years.
I myself experienced CX being pretty generous handing out GO status: Without signing up for MPC, I got invited for GO, with only 2.5 returns I/D class EU-BKK flown (with another 1.5 returns already booked, though). So who knows, what is possible.
Maybe we all should realize, the MPC is there to give a benefit to CX, through some (addictive) benefits (as less as possible) for the frequent flyer. No more, no less......
Feel free to correct again
Oh, and when flying J or higher, the SILVER/GOLD benefits are pretty low, given the perks that come with the flight class. Lounge invitation and overweight luggage (hauling around 50 kg!) might be interesting, that's about it.
On the other hand, I don't think there's an official soft landing policy, though this I'm not 100% sure. You can check https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...-landings.html. MPO certainly gives soft landing in many cases, and I myself and one of my parents have experienced it, although my other parent didn't. A DM who got ~500 points might have a good chance of being soft-landed to GO "as a goodwill gesture," but I doubt it would be the case for a DM who has little or no activity.
I agree with you that SL means almost nothing when flying J and likewise for GO if no companion in a lower cabin. Don't think a DM flying F without companion will get that much extra, either.
#68
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SFO/HKG
Programs: ex-UA 1K, AA EXP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 535
Just to share a data point. Was on a 77H to PEK (the DM-heavy 390) earlier this week. the First/DM line had about 30 people. Water wasn't offered until asked but they did block the seat next to me (the flight was Y2 with F/J/W 0 I believe). I still think on short-haul, having the seat next to me empty is one of the biggest benefits of being DM (not sure the same for OWE?) as a lot of us have to fly Y (even though on ridiculously priced full Y) on short-haul due to company policy.
#69
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
Seat blocking for DM is definitely true because a DM friend of mine that flies exclusively R/Y told me most of the time as long as the plane isn't full the seat next to him is blocked. I don't think it's a given like in years past.
#70
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
For those that are ignorant about what I'm talking about (and pretends to know better). I'm not talking about the official passenger manifest printout. Seasoned Cathay fliers will know the cabin crew usually has a tac note stick in the crew area, and on the tac note are hand-written information usually in this format: Seat number - status. Example: 17A - DM, 32B - DM, 44C - EMD.
In the past I've seen tac notes that only has DM and GOs seat numbers written down. But like I've said in my OP, now it's DM and EMD with no GO, and a good chat with the crew reveals they are no longer trained to treat GO well.
In the past I've seen tac notes that only has DM and GOs seat numbers written down. But like I've said in my OP, now it's DM and EMD with no GO, and a good chat with the crew reveals they are no longer trained to treat GO well.
#71
Join Date: Apr 2017
Programs: Marco Polo Club, KF
Posts: 208
This is just not true. I have to say this thread is somewhat baffling. If CX GOs are truly feeling hard done by, I suggest they take a moment to travel (as GO equivalent) on 90% of the other airlines out there and compare the experience.
#72
Join Date: May 2016
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SQ Gold
Posts: 81
I have never demanded anything outside of what they can in Y though and so does he so I couldn't vouch on that aspect.
#73
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
The argument is not how is Cathay compared to other airlines, but how is Cathay compared to its former glory.
#74
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: CX
Posts: 19
I have been a gold member for the last three years. Greetings and op-ups have indeed become a rarity recently. I got more op-ups and greetings with my previous status which was silver. Interestingly I have received the most greetings on shorthaul intra-asian flights while on longhaul flights - where one might assume that there is more than enough time for such a gesture - they seem to have vanished completely. Thus I can only speak for the Zürich to Hongkong and Hongkong to Zürich flights as I am a regular on this route.
#75
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: SFO/HKG
Programs: ex-UA 1K, AA EXP, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 535
I have been a gold member for the last three years. Greetings and op-ups have indeed become a rarity recently. I got more op-ups and greetings with my previous status which was silver. Interestingly I have received the most greetings on shorthaul intra-asian flights while on longhaul flights - where one might assume that there is more than enough time for such a gesture - they seem to have vanished completely. Thus I can only speak for the Zürich to Hongkong and Hongkong to Zürich flights as I am a regular on this route.