Full-fare C ticket / involuntary downgrade / no reason, no comp / CX829 YYZ-HKG
#61
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
I'm pretty shocked at this situation. I'm not a lawyer but that's just blatantly stealing money from the customer.
They also have clearly very limited protocol with offloading passengers. In another thread perhaps 6+ months ago, recall we saw a CX Diamond member whom CX tried to IDB from J class ex-EWR. And here you've got CX essentially doing IDB from class of service (via invol downgrade) to what amounts to a high-yielding J class pax. Dumb. There are 40 seats on 77G...certainly they could've figured out SOMEONE else to choose. Say 20/40 are CX elites that leaves 20 others to choose from. I think there is a nearly 0% probability that all the rest of the passengers were on equally expensive tickets.
And then to not even offer the actual fare difference. That's shameless.
They also have clearly very limited protocol with offloading passengers. In another thread perhaps 6+ months ago, recall we saw a CX Diamond member whom CX tried to IDB from J class ex-EWR. And here you've got CX essentially doing IDB from class of service (via invol downgrade) to what amounts to a high-yielding J class pax. Dumb. There are 40 seats on 77G...certainly they could've figured out SOMEONE else to choose. Say 20/40 are CX elites that leaves 20 others to choose from. I think there is a nearly 0% probability that all the rest of the passengers were on equally expensive tickets.
And then to not even offer the actual fare difference. That's shameless.
#62
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2013
Programs: CX GO, SPG GO
Posts: 31
QRC - Partner verified with outport manager that yes, there were cheaper fare class tickets on the flight, and yes, there were people who checked in afterwards. He could provide no explanation as to why, if the above two variables were true, that my partner got bumped.
#63
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA EC
Posts: 524
Christep - not my card. Corporate travel desk paid - it's escalating via that channel.
QRC - Partner verified with outport manager that yes, there were cheaper fare class tickets on the flight, and yes, there were people who checked in afterwards. He could provide no explanation as to why, if the above two variables were true, that my partner got bumped.
QRC - Partner verified with outport manager that yes, there were cheaper fare class tickets on the flight, and yes, there were people who checked in afterwards. He could provide no explanation as to why, if the above two variables were true, that my partner got bumped.
Your SO could not complete OLCI because your SO didn't select in advance, which made your SO didn't even have a sequence in the system.
On the other hand, other pax already had an assigned seat, they can do OLCI, therefore they were sequenced in the system. Other pax may turn up later then your SO in the airport, hence "check-in" later than your SO. They could broad the plane as they had a seat and were checked in. Therefore I always emphasis select a seat in advance is very important.
Yet, there are still cases CX will take away your selected seats to accommodate other pax, like status pax, VIPs, staff on duty travel or whatever other reasons.
All in all, I strongly agree you are entitled a refund for the downgrade with relevant compensation, eg upgrade voucher and miles. Hope CX can give you something that satisfy you.
#64
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,232
#65
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC/SIN
Programs: CX DM, SQ KF
Posts: 2,171
umm..when things go turtle, like a typhoon or other irrops, it's CX's ground service - the getting it done, rather than the frilly stuff, that I and a few other CX frequent fliers that I know, really value!
#66
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
I would agree with that. My experience is getting a bit dated now, but having DM status when things went pear-shaped was one of the best benefits of the status.
#67
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
As I have told you before, which you think i'm impolite, is that the priority of offload depends on (1) the pax's status followed by (2) seq of check-in. "Fare" paid is not too relevant.
Your SO could not complete OLCI because your SO didn't select in advance, which made your SO didn't even have a sequence in the system.
On the other hand, other pax already had an assigned seat, they can do OLCI, therefore they were sequenced in the system. Other pax may turn up later then your SO in the airport, hence "check-in" later than your SO. They could broad the plane as they had a seat and were checked in. Therefore I always emphasis select a seat in advance is very important.
Yet, there are still cases CX will take away your selected seats to accommodate other pax, like status pax, VIPs, staff on duty travel or whatever other reasons.
Your SO could not complete OLCI because your SO didn't select in advance, which made your SO didn't even have a sequence in the system.
On the other hand, other pax already had an assigned seat, they can do OLCI, therefore they were sequenced in the system. Other pax may turn up later then your SO in the airport, hence "check-in" later than your SO. They could broad the plane as they had a seat and were checked in. Therefore I always emphasis select a seat in advance is very important.
Yet, there are still cases CX will take away your selected seats to accommodate other pax, like status pax, VIPs, staff on duty travel or whatever other reasons.
#68
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2013
Programs: CX GO, SPG GO
Posts: 31
Yup, you are.
Do you work for CX? You seem to be awfully confident in your knowledge of their inner workings. If you do work for CX, great; just come out and say it and let's have a face to face conversation in HKG.
I don't find your responses helpful, as you've repeatedly ignored posted facts to get your internet wins in.
Outport manager confirmed verbally that there were check in AFTER my partner's, as well as non-status pax in the J cabin.
Do you work for CX? You seem to be awfully confident in your knowledge of their inner workings. If you do work for CX, great; just come out and say it and let's have a face to face conversation in HKG.
I don't find your responses helpful, as you've repeatedly ignored posted facts to get your internet wins in.
Outport manager confirmed verbally that there were check in AFTER my partner's, as well as non-status pax in the J cabin.
#69
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
Okay everyone calm down.
@Neat0 - the fact is that we don't know how or why people are chosen for downgrade. Unfortunately it happens. Ranting on this forum and at other members isn't going to help you get your money back.
As for compensation, CX has not handled this well. You are NOT going to get a calculation of fare difference at the check-in desk. However, they could have been more gracious in explaining how the reimbursement of fare difference would be done (ie that you can contact customer service after the fact for resolution) and also offered better goodwill compensation on the spot. Usually they will seek out downgrade volunteers and offer them compensation to encourage downgrades. Or given you alternatives for how to travel - eg you could choose to travel the next flight in your ticketed class. Don't know why this didn't happen in this case.
At this point, as you have been advised here, calculate what you think is owed and make a claim to CX. Keep to the facts, don't muddy the waters with claims for distress - it doesn't help your case. Just calculate the amount you think you should get and also ask for goodwill compensation for your inconvenience such as an upgrade voucher for a future flight.
(If you do get an upgrade voucher, be aware these can only be used based on availability on check-in)
@Neat0 - the fact is that we don't know how or why people are chosen for downgrade. Unfortunately it happens. Ranting on this forum and at other members isn't going to help you get your money back.
As for compensation, CX has not handled this well. You are NOT going to get a calculation of fare difference at the check-in desk. However, they could have been more gracious in explaining how the reimbursement of fare difference would be done (ie that you can contact customer service after the fact for resolution) and also offered better goodwill compensation on the spot. Usually they will seek out downgrade volunteers and offer them compensation to encourage downgrades. Or given you alternatives for how to travel - eg you could choose to travel the next flight in your ticketed class. Don't know why this didn't happen in this case.
At this point, as you have been advised here, calculate what you think is owed and make a claim to CX. Keep to the facts, don't muddy the waters with claims for distress - it doesn't help your case. Just calculate the amount you think you should get and also ask for goodwill compensation for your inconvenience such as an upgrade voucher for a future flight.
(If you do get an upgrade voucher, be aware these can only be used based on availability on check-in)
#70
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,409
I've updated the screenshot in https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...l#post29074426 . (81,300-38,510)/2 = HK$21,395 to be refunded
Just to validate my screenshot, OP SO's fare = (63,290(C) + 81,300(J))/2 = HK$72,295 <-- $5 off what OP reported
The approx 10 days OP stated should be close as I'm able to reverse engineer his fare. OP can claim $21,395 and wait for CX to make an exact calculation, so long as it is materially similar to $21,395.
Just to validate my screenshot, OP SO's fare = (63,290(C) + 81,300(J))/2 = HK$72,295 <-- $5 off what OP reported
The approx 10 days OP stated should be close as I'm able to reverse engineer his fare. OP can claim $21,395 and wait for CX to make an exact calculation, so long as it is materially similar to $21,395.
#71
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
Still, percysmith's calculation is still usable in this case. Airline maths is not your usual math. So using percysmith's calculation with what you have pointed out, it would be logically, excluding any goodwill compensation, OP's SO should receive MORE than what percysmith pointed out. Otherwise, CX has lowballed OP's SO.
#72
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,556
First, he showed us how the whole ticket was priced as a mix of C and J return fare.
Second,he showed us the fare difference by taking half of the return J fare (not of the whole ticket price) minus half of the return W PE fare. That is exactly what you are claiming one should do.
The only question is whether we should use the W or the R fare for PE. Also CX might use a different one-segment pricing from Canada.
#73
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ZOA, SFO, HKG
Programs: UA 1K 0.9MM, Marriott Gold, HHonors Gold, Hertz PC, SBux Gold, TSA Pre✓
Posts: 13,811
#74
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC/SIN
Programs: CX DM, SQ KF
Posts: 2,171
I believe that percysmith did the correct calculation and that you misread his post.
First, he showed us how the whole ticket was priced as a mix of C and J return fare.
Second,he showed us the fare difference by taking half of the return J fare (not of the whole ticket price) minus half of the return W PE fare. That is exactly what you are claiming one should do.
The only question is whether we should use the W or the R fare for PE. Also CX might use a different one-segment pricing from Canada.
First, he showed us how the whole ticket was priced as a mix of C and J return fare.
Second,he showed us the fare difference by taking half of the return J fare (not of the whole ticket price) minus half of the return W PE fare. That is exactly what you are claiming one should do.
The only question is whether we should use the W or the R fare for PE. Also CX might use a different one-segment pricing from Canada.
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,556
On a related issue.
What is CX policy for such refund if ticket is paid by a company?
Does CX refund the company who paid for the ticket or the pax? Airlines have different policies for such downgrades.
In the former case, it would really be a refund (plus a possible compensation for the pax). In the later case if would be a compensation to the pax.
Note that EC261 is clear and simple regarding the amount of compensation for a downgrade, namely 75% of the ticket price (for longhaul) without a reference to a fare differential. Much easier to calculate and more money. However, some airlines pay it to the company who bought the ticket.
What is CX policy for such refund if ticket is paid by a company?
Does CX refund the company who paid for the ticket or the pax? Airlines have different policies for such downgrades.
In the former case, it would really be a refund (plus a possible compensation for the pax). In the later case if would be a compensation to the pax.
Note that EC261 is clear and simple regarding the amount of compensation for a downgrade, namely 75% of the ticket price (for longhaul) without a reference to a fare differential. Much easier to calculate and more money. However, some airlines pay it to the company who bought the ticket.