Cathay Pacific to slash housing packages for pilots
#31
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,421
MSP - yes. Last year there was negotiations union/ airline, that the members voted against approving in the end. So Cathay didn't put forward the contract change. So 'as if' collective bargaining
Kachjc. Eh? in 2009 HKIA was at 2/3 capacity, of which CX had half. For CX to have hogged the slots, they would have had to double in size in a very short period of time. Which almost certainly wasn't economically or operationally possible.
And, if you knew after the GFA in 2008 that HKG was going to become crowded that fast, well, I hope you also went all in with buying HK property on margin!
Kachjc. Eh? in 2009 HKIA was at 2/3 capacity, of which CX had half. For CX to have hogged the slots, they would have had to double in size in a very short period of time. Which almost certainly wasn't economically or operationally possible.
And, if you knew after the GFA in 2008 that HKG was going to become crowded that fast, well, I hope you also went all in with buying HK property on margin!
2010 CX posted its largest profit ever
2011-2013 was the time to expand rapidly- like the rest of the world
instead CX just sat
while HX became stronger
QF/AA all became stronger
CX launched Milan during that time period- Cute
CX now has under 40% slot share....
Double in size?!! hardly, CX in 2009 had 126 aircraft
CX now has 146 aircraft...- you would not need to double... ( 20 aircraft growth in 8 years- in Asia- the fastest growing and most populated place on earth)
CX would not have had to double....
short term investment for longterm gain- no new runway till 2030- CX would have been raking it in for 15 years...
instead the let HX grow to a sizeable threat
just look at Auckland- the fact that HX can sustain more capacity their than CX is an indicator of how CX just let competitors takeover.
#32
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: China
Posts: 1,548
OK - more than double.
66% of slots were filled in 2009 (source, HKIA)
CX/KA ISTR had 45%. So 30% of full HKIA capacity
To fill all slots, they would need to add 34% (66+34)
34 is over twice 30. To add that in 4-5 year time period would mean growth rate of20- 25%.
And CX/ KA/ AHK have about 190 aircraft, not 146.
66% of slots were filled in 2009 (source, HKIA)
CX/KA ISTR had 45%. So 30% of full HKIA capacity
To fill all slots, they would need to add 34% (66+34)
34 is over twice 30. To add that in 4-5 year time period would mean growth rate of20- 25%.
And CX/ KA/ AHK have about 190 aircraft, not 146.
#33
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: HKG
Programs: CX DM, SQ, BA, TG, Sheba, VN, MPO since 1980
Posts: 1,058
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathay_Pacific
On 26 September 2012, 11 years after they were sacked, the 49ers were finally judged[41] to have won the 3 prime issues of their legal case: breach of contract, breach of the Employment Ordinance, and defamation. The Court of Final Appeal agreed with the Court of Appeal's methodology for reducing the defamation damages. However, it reinstated one month's salary for each of the 49ers.
Regarding breach of contract,[42] the overall picture leading to dismissal and events immediately after will be analysed by the courts, not just the dismissal letter. Regarding the Employment Ordinance, an important aspect was that the judgment defined the scope of "union activities" and its protection for workers in Hong Kong. The Court concluded: "Accordingly, most (possibly all) union-sponsored action is potentially protected by s 21B(1)(b), but if the action is not carried out “at [an] appropriate time”, it is excluded from the provision." There was no challenge by Cathay Pacific to the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the {original} Judge’s conclusion that the statements made by Cathay Executives were defamatory of the plaintiffs.
On 26 September 2012, 11 years after they were sacked, the 49ers were finally judged[41] to have won the 3 prime issues of their legal case: breach of contract, breach of the Employment Ordinance, and defamation. The Court of Final Appeal agreed with the Court of Appeal's methodology for reducing the defamation damages. However, it reinstated one month's salary for each of the 49ers.
Regarding breach of contract,[42] the overall picture leading to dismissal and events immediately after will be analysed by the courts, not just the dismissal letter. Regarding the Employment Ordinance, an important aspect was that the judgment defined the scope of "union activities" and its protection for workers in Hong Kong. The Court concluded: "Accordingly, most (possibly all) union-sponsored action is potentially protected by s 21B(1)(b), but if the action is not carried out “at [an] appropriate time”, it is excluded from the provision." There was no challenge by Cathay Pacific to the Court of Appeal’s decision to uphold the {original} Judge’s conclusion that the statements made by Cathay Executives were defamatory of the plaintiffs.
#34
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,540
My understanding is that it is a bit more complex than that.
Are CX pilots in HK "at will" employees? Yes. The jdugements following the firings in 2001 established that.
However, there are multiple contracts for pilots. New pilots (well, for past few years) have been on set housing allowance of xx per month. Cathay isn't changing these
What it wants to change is the older contracts, which say something like 'suitable housing will be provided'. Up to now, that has meant CX paying LL directly, or re-imbursing pilots rents/ mortgages. CX has given notice that it intends to change this, don't know what to, but presumably same xx that new pilots get. CX position will probably be that this isn't a change in contract, as this will still allow for suitable housing, and so doesn't need individual's agreement. Union's position will probably be that this is a change in contract, and so need mutual agreement.
Note collective bargaining doesn't exist in HK. Union can only advise, individuals still have to agree/ not agree contract changes on one to one basis with company.
Are CX pilots in HK "at will" employees? Yes. The jdugements following the firings in 2001 established that.
However, there are multiple contracts for pilots. New pilots (well, for past few years) have been on set housing allowance of xx per month. Cathay isn't changing these
What it wants to change is the older contracts, which say something like 'suitable housing will be provided'. Up to now, that has meant CX paying LL directly, or re-imbursing pilots rents/ mortgages. CX has given notice that it intends to change this, don't know what to, but presumably same xx that new pilots get. CX position will probably be that this isn't a change in contract, as this will still allow for suitable housing, and so doesn't need individual's agreement. Union's position will probably be that this is a change in contract, and so need mutual agreement.
Note collective bargaining doesn't exist in HK. Union can only advise, individuals still have to agree/ not agree contract changes on one to one basis with company.
BTW, the "pilot-shortage" mantra might be a bit misleading. CX has no problem recruiting pilots at the current working conditions. And senior (old) CX pilots are unlikely to get similar terms, even after housing adjustment, anywhere else. Favorable perks for "old" pilots exist in many legacy airlines, but airlines simply do not recruit new pilots under these types of contracts anymore.
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
Let's be clear that the most senior CX pilots have total packages in excess of HK$5M per year. That's approximately 30 times the median income in Hong Kong, and more than HK's Chief Executive (already one of the highest paid political leaders in the world) gets paid.
And those pilots only work about 10 days a month, and they get to travel in at least business class, more or less for free, worldwide, whenever they feel like it.
And those pilots only work about 10 days a month, and they get to travel in at least business class, more or less for free, worldwide, whenever they feel like it.
#36
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 0°48′24″N 176°36′59″W
Programs: Taiwan is a country.
Posts: 1,206
Let's be clear that the most senior CX pilots have total packages in excess of HK$5M per year. That's approximately 30 times the median income in Hong Kong, and more than HK's Chief Executive (already one of the highest paid political leaders in the world) gets paid.
And those pilots only work about 10 days a month, and they get to travel in at least business class, more or less for free, worldwide, whenever they feel like it.
And those pilots only work about 10 days a month, and they get to travel in at least business class, more or less for free, worldwide, whenever they feel like it.
Lets be equally clear.. its not just OLD pilots.
My friend is 39 married to a local girl and makes not even 1/3 of what you posted. He gets "full" housing. Your numbers are way off.
Business Class Long Haul is near a $1000 USD on Standby RT... and shockingly.. FULL most of the time so his family buys tickets.
No one works 10 days a month. NO ONE.
Lastly.
The Director of Flight Operations Anna Thompson received 4 million in Housing last year, and Rupert Hogg CEO received 10 Million.
Neither are taking a pay cut.
This is simple corporate greed.
#37
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: None any more
Posts: 11,017
They are from CX's annual report and accounts.I know several CX long haul pilots. They do 2-3 round trips each month. By normal people's definition that's at most 12 days work.
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
Remember pilots also have mandated rest days. Once you factor that in, 12 days isn’t far off the standard 20 day working month.
#39
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,339
They, too, are overpaid, and agreed they should also get a big pay cut, along with the pilots. Truth of the matter is, everyone's been living like its pre-2008; its about time things are brought back in-line.
#40
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: HKG
Programs: AA 3MM EXP, SQ Solitaire, LH SEN, CX DM, Hyatt CC, Marriott LT Titanium
Posts: 3,177
It's in the annual report... Not specific individual pilots, but I remember a section that vaguely lists out the top 10 earners in the company, of which a number of them were pilots...
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
I don't see any information that can infer how much the top earning pilots earn.
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,540
You might be referring to confirmed staff ticket, but that's quite different.
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
That's simply wrong. ID ticket cost much less (maybe you are talking HKD1,000) and pilots have total priority. But if a flight it's full, it's full; but unfortunately for CX, this is not "mostly" the case.
You might be referring to confirmed staff ticket, but that's quite different.
You might be referring to confirmed staff ticket, but that's quite different.
And I have been also told that staff travel is very difficult to get on unless you’re very flexible - even for pilots.
#44
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 0°48′24″N 176°36′59″W
Programs: Taiwan is a country.
Posts: 1,206
But I'll tell you a Capt would make low 100's + housing varied from 24K to Mid 60's
So if he averages 180K X12... you'll see a Senior guy makes 1/2 that 5 million figure.
A FO would be mid 60's + Housing.. So maybe 120K X 12.. 1.64
No one makes millions at CX but the Directors..
#45
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: 0°48′24″N 176°36′59″W
Programs: Taiwan is a country.
Posts: 1,206
That's simply wrong. ID ticket cost much less (maybe you are talking HKD1,000) and pilots have total priority. But if a flight it's full, it's full; but unfortunately for CX, this is not "mostly" the case.
You might be referring to confirmed staff ticket, but that's quite different.
You might be referring to confirmed staff ticket, but that's quite different.
I'm on a staff ticket with friend tonight.. each ticket was over $500 usd ow to North America.
You're wrong.