Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

Cathay lost mid-range Y flyers and C flyers

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Cathay lost mid-range Y flyers and C flyers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2017, 9:31 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
Cathay lost mid-range Y flyers and C flyers

Wow, I just saw an ad from US to China round-trip at less than $600?!?!?! Cathay must be really desperate to fill their seats now. My colleagues have always complain about how they were forced to pay a mid-range price for Y tickets because they want to maintain GO and DM. However, after the new system they realized they can only earn SL, so they either give up any hope to make higher tier and simply buy the cheapest fare, or they give up Cathay all together and seek better postures elsewhere.

The biggest irony is Cathay is losing C flyers as well. Cathay thinks it was a good idea to cut expenses by not cutting staff (now is too little too late), but rather cut everything their C flyers hold dear: catering, quality of on-board services, phone services, reduced elite benefits, etc. They have successfully ran away a bunch of C flyers that sought to seek better pastures elsewhere too.

So now Cathay is hanging on to dear life by offering $500+ roundtrip tickets to USA? Amazing.
Cathay Dragon 666 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 10:14 am
  #2  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Racing to the bottom with a high value name is a holden route to death.
either the board is stupid or, its bloody china stakes playing up in the cx boardroom.
kaka is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 10:15 am
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,454
They're just trying to compete with the fares offered by other carriers on those routes.

One of CX's biggest problems (IMO) is they are often not price competitive. By a large margin. It's a rational move for them to drive volume by competing on fares.
Kacee is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 12:47 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Programs: MPC,CA,MU,AF
Posts: 8,171
CX may be losing NA flyers, but they are probably gaining PVG/SHA/PEK flyers.
cxfan1960 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 1:23 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: New York
Programs: AA, CX, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 1,484
Believe AA (and/or UA) both had similar deals last year, around $500.
andersonCooper is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 4:23 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,170
i find recently they are trying hard with promotional fares... but they F*** you hard when you really need them, on a busy flight i wanted to take at las notife they wanted to rape me with 12k on economy for what is usually sold at 4k.

this is not how u win customer, go mega sale when times are tough and blatantly rape you when you need

and no i didn buy CX i found other routing/career
fakecd is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 9:05 pm
  #7  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
Originally Posted by fakecd
i find recently they are trying hard with promotional fares... but they F*** you hard when you really need them, on a busy flight i wanted to take at las notife they wanted to rape me with 12k on economy for what is usually sold at 4k.
Happens to me all the time. Hong Kong's airline my [insert four letter word here].
percysmith is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 9:58 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: Lowly CX & IHG
Posts: 382
Always thought low fares are to keep the frequencies running so high-paying pax could throw $ at their most preferred timings in whichever short notice?
watery is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 10:07 pm
  #9  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
Originally Posted by watery
Always thought low fares are to keep the frequencies running so high-paying pax could throw $ at their most preferred timings in whichever short notice?
Yes but O&D passengers get their wallets as well as their shoulders squeezed.
percysmith is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 10:16 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,783
Originally Posted by percysmith
[insert four letter word here].
Cock?!
maortega15 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 11:12 pm
  #11  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ORD [formerly] + HKG
Programs: CX Diamond, AA exExPlat, BAEC exGold, HH Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Starriott Titanium, GE
Posts: 2,966
Originally Posted by percysmith
Yes but O&D passengers get their wallets as well as their shoulders squeezed.
It's not as bad as it used to be. A roundtrip to MAN in J was selling for $39k. 'Not very big of a difference,' said my dad when QR was charging $20k. 'You won't get shot down and catch MERS, and I don't know how to do transit anyway, such a waste of time' So tons and tons of O/D people would still be happy with CX's reduced ex-HKG prices nowadays I suspect.
G-CIVC is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 12:07 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 7,708
Originally Posted by G-CIVC
It's not as bad as it used to be. A roundtrip to MAN in J was selling for $39k. 'Not very big of a difference,' said my dad when QR was charging $20k. 'You won't get shot down and catch MERS, and I don't know how to do transit anyway, such a waste of time' So tons and tons of O/D people would still be happy with CX's reduced ex-HKG prices nowadays I suspect.
yea, this is a good point. The ex-HKG fares have gotten at least a little more reasonable in the last year. Nowadays, even with a little advance notice you can score long-haul J tickets for about $5k USD to Europe or the US. In the past US tickets used to be more like $7-10k in the window I normally book.
QRC3288 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 12:41 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 291
Originally Posted by Cathay Dragon 666
Wow, I just saw an ad from US to China round-trip at less than $600?!?!?! Cathay must be really desperate to fill their seats now. My colleagues have always complain about how they were forced to pay a mid-range price for Y tickets because they want to maintain GO and DM. However, after the new system they realized they can only earn SL, so they either give up any hope to make higher tier and simply buy the cheapest fare, or they give up Cathay all together and seek better postures elsewhere.

The biggest irony is Cathay is losing C flyers as well. Cathay thinks it was a good idea to cut expenses by not cutting staff (now is too little too late), but rather cut everything their C flyers hold dear: catering, quality of on-board services, phone services, reduced elite benefits, etc. They have successfully ran away a bunch of C flyers that sought to seek better pastures elsewhere too.

So now Cathay is hanging on to dear life by offering $500+ roundtrip tickets to USA? Amazing.

Chinese airlines even charge less for a direct flight .
Aus106080 is offline  
Old Jul 21, 2017, 12:43 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 291
Originally Posted by kaka
Racing to the bottom with a high value name is a holden route to death.
either the board is stupid or, its bloody china stakes playing up in the cx boardroom.
It is a trend.
Aus106080 is offline  
Old Jul 22, 2017, 1:26 am
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Explorist, Marco Polo Gold
Posts: 1,084
Some of you are missing the point. Yes there's downward pressure from competitors charging less. HOWEVER, Cathay has always been able to get people to PAY MORE flying with them because they OFFER MORE. Some quick examples:

1) People (in the past) have always been willing to pay a mark-up of 10-20% more (vs. competitor prices) because they know they will get quality all around flying with Cathay.

2) Under the old MPO system, many "Econ-GO/DMs" are paying a good mid-range Econ fares (i.e. 30% more than the lowest fare offered) to maintain status. Cathay has lost them too.

3) Downward death spiral - to cover for lost revenue, instead of cutting needless staff or returning to the old winning formula, Cathay decided to cut quality of their product all-around, at the point even C flyers are abandoning them.

4) Instead of offering friendly mid-level prices that are reasonable all-around, Cathay decided to throw around deep-discounts at selected times and dates, but still only offer ridiculous fares on other times, i.e., making it impossible to stay loyal to Cathay to fly whenever, however, one wanted.

A 5-star quality airline is not about stooping down to the lesser competitor's fares. I would still pay Cathay 30% more against any China-based airlines IF AND ONLY IF Cathay was the old Cathay, i.e. high quality service, products, etc.

Cathay wanted to stoop down to the levels of China-based airlines and compete against them that way? Just disband now, because this strategy has only one result: bankruptcy.
Cathay Dragon 666 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.