Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

HKG: Exiting the airport after going to the lounge

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

HKG: Exiting the airport after going to the lounge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2019, 9:51 am
  #301  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,773
Originally Posted by moondog
1. Transit passengers who go to departures should be permitted to leave departures 180 minutes later
Why regularise this?
It's clearly not where HKIA or other airports want to be going from a security perspective
If from a customer service perspective - again - arrivals lounge like LHR T5?
kaka and windchaser777 like this.
percysmith is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2019, 9:52 am
  #302  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 876
SQ allows their first class passenger to use TPR as arrival lounge due to the design of the airport (arrival and departure on the same floor).

HKIA segregated arrival and departure passenger in two different area. For security reason, they need a member of staff who has airport pass to accompany passenger who wants to leave departure level via a restricted area.

I was offered once some years ago. After a good sleep on plane ~10hr, was woke up by cabin crew 20min before landing. Quickly changed my pajamas and ready to land. ISM told me just to have breakfast in the lounge, so a doggie bag was not offered. Halfway during my breakfast, then I recalled my baggage was just tagged to HKG due to some unknown reason (brain really started to work after some food). Told the staff, so they gave me two option.

1. They call the baggage reclaim to retag the baggage for me.
or
2. Escort me to arrival to collect my baggage myself and recheck in.

My transit was only around 4hr.

p.s. really like the practice they do not to wake passenger up for breakfast if the passenger is still asleep.
kaka likes this.
jjjohn is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2019, 10:59 am
  #303  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by jjjohn
SQ allows their first class passenger to use TPR as arrival lounge due to the design of the airport (arrival and departure on the same floor).

HKIA segregated arrival and departure passenger in two different area. For security reason, they need a member of staff who has airport pass to accompany passenger who wants to leave departure level via a restricted area.

I was offered once some years ago. After a good sleep on plane ~10hr, was woke up by cabin crew 20min before landing. Quickly changed my pajamas and ready to land. ISM told me just to have breakfast in the lounge, so a doggie bag was not offered. Halfway during my breakfast, then I recalled my baggage was just tagged to HKG due to some unknown reason (brain really started to work after some food). Told the staff, so they gave me two option.

1. They call the baggage reclaim to retag the baggage for me.
or
2. Escort me to arrival to collect my baggage myself and recheck in.

My transit was only around 4hr.

p.s. really like the practice they do not to wake passenger up for breakfast if the passenger is still asleep.
the big problem is people going airside with zero intention to fly (but they cant prove anyway) but not using the lounge as an arrivals lounge during transit or for whatever reason needing to go through landside.

procedures are different if you need to cancel a departure vs entering hk after going to departures
kaka is offline  
Old Feb 16, 2019, 2:53 pm
  #304  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,684
Just a data point on leaving CX pier to head home in HK.

There was massive late evening delay with CX/KA on Jan 27, my 2000 departure HKG KUL was delayed and when the new flight was announced at 0045 Jan 28 at 845pm I decide to pack it in and fly out the next morning.
Counter staff made all my fight changes in 5 minutes and I was then immediately escorted via a waiting cart to just before the immigration gates.

Base on my datapoint they are taking their time filing these visit lounge and then leave airside for HK request.
kaka and QRC3288 like this.
tentseller is offline  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 1:40 am
  #305  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 41,991
Originally Posted by percysmith
Why regularise this?
It's clearly not where HKIA or other airports want to be going from a security perspective
If from a customer service perspective - again - arrivals lounge like LHR T5?
This practice needs to be stopped; sorry for being so blunt.
moondog is online now  
Old Feb 17, 2019, 8:09 am
  #306  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by moondog
This practice needs to be stopped; sorry for being so blunt.
only low class airlines like ba or ca would disallow this antisocial behaviour.
kaka is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 7:54 am
  #307  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Hong Kong, France
Programs: FB , BA Gold
Posts: 15,545
Originally Posted by tentseller
Just a data point on leaving CX pier to head home in HK.

There was massive late evening delay with CX/KA on Jan 27, my 2000 departure HKG KUL was delayed and when the new flight was announced at 0045 Jan 28 at 845pm I decide to pack it in and fly out the next morning.
Counter staff made all my fight changes in 5 minutes and I was then immediately escorted via a waiting cart to just before the immigration gates.

Base on my datapoint they are taking their time filing these visit lounge and then leave airside for HK request.
That's interesting. A similar thing happened to me a few months ago and I was escorted to the immigration office. Could not use the arrival immigration gates (I am PR) and had to wait almost an hour to be "processed" by immigraiton.
brunos is online now  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 8:41 am
  #308  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,684
Originally Posted by brunos
That's interesting. A similar thing happened to me a few months ago and I was escorted to the immigration office. Could not use the arrival immigration gates (I am PR) and had to wait almost an hour to be "processed" by immigraiton.
I was taken downstairs to the arrival level where the cart was waiting and dropped off just before the HKPR gates and after dutyfree.

Maybe it was the time of day, the level of disruption and relationship with CX.
tentseller is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 6:09 pm
  #309  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by tentseller
I was taken downstairs to the arrival level where the cart was waiting and dropped off just before the HKPR gates and after dutyfree.

Maybe it was the time of day, the level of disruption and relationship with CX.
were you on a transit?

Last edited by kaka; Feb 19, 2019 at 12:01 am
kaka is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 7:22 pm
  #310  
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,773
Originally Posted by tentseller
I was taken downstairs to the arrival level where the cart was waiting and dropped off just before the HKPR gates and after dutyfree.

Maybe it was the time of day, the level of disruption and relationship with CX.
No, IRROPs

I had the same in 2011 with HX. Had to be escorted, and multiple logbooks have to be filled in.
percysmith is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 9:23 pm
  #311  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by percysmith
No, IRROPs

I had the same in 2011 with HX. Had to be escorted, and multiple logbooks have to be filled in.
if one was on a transit its much easier (just enter hk as a tourist or what not)
for you they have to cancel your exit record (otherwise you left and re-enter hk without going anywhere)

same applies when you run into irrops elsewhere at an origin/stopover point of a trip (not transit nor transit as a stopover)- they have to cancel your exit record. at least thats the logic behind it and ure not at a dodgy country.

Last edited by kaka; Feb 19, 2019 at 12:28 am
kaka is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 10:49 pm
  #312  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: a hotel room, somewhere...
Posts: 962
Originally Posted by moondog
I'm pretty sure that helping people cheat the system, at the expense of attending to others, is not part of the job description.
"cheat the system"?... a bit overly dramatic, aren't we.

I've been in that same lounge when i decided just to stay in the airport vs get a hotel (arrived 9pm with a 6am connection) and had the same snotty agents ask me why i don't just get a hotel for the night (which would obviously require the same escort)- so i don't think it's a bfd. i've been there when there were irrops that substantially delayed flights and people have left for a hotel- OBVIOUSLY.

are you even aware of how big of an 'inconvenience' this is to them?

i'll enlighten you- as i was curious after my insane wait with what ended up being FOUR greeters doing nothing for the final 15 minutes of my wait, i know exactly how long it took: 2 minutes and 4 seconds- with better elevator timing, we'd have been closer to 90 seconds. the guard to keep people from going the opposite way i was going at immigration wasn't exactly thrown by this unprecedented 'rule breaking' i was committing. she looked at me, my passport and my boarding pass for a combined nanosecond as she waived we towards the door.

they weren't busy. they are rarely busy (understatement). their job is to help the people who have access to the first class lounge. i was flying CX first class. they spent way more time deflecting me than it took to help me. what i did was not against any rules (i asked). so.... how exactly is helping me for 2 minutes and 4 seconds asking too much, much less the crime against humanity some here seem to think????????
kaka likes this.
uncommonsensical is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 11:32 pm
  #313  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by uncommonsensical
"cheat the system"?... a bit overly dramatic, aren't we.

I've been in that same lounge when i decided just to stay in the airport vs get a hotel (arrived 9pm with a 6am connection) and had the same snotty agents ask me why i don't just get a hotel for the night (which would obviously require the same escort)- so i don't think it's a bfd. i've been there when there were irrops that substantially delayed flights and people have left for a hotel- OBVIOUSLY.

are you even aware of how big of an 'inconvenience' this is to them?

i'll enlighten you- as i was curious after my insane wait with what ended up being FOUR greeters doing nothing for the final 15 minutes of my wait, i know exactly how long it took: 2 minutes and 4 seconds- with better elevator timing, we'd have been closer to 90 seconds. the guard to keep people from going the opposite way i was going at immigration wasn't exactly thrown by this unprecedented 'rule breaking' i was committing. she looked at me, my passport and my boarding pass for a combined nanosecond as she waived we towards the door.

they weren't busy. they are rarely busy (understatement). their job is to help the people who have access to the first class lounge. i was flying CX first class. they spent way more time deflecting me than it took to help me. what i did was not against any rules (i asked). so.... how exactly is helping me for 2 minutes and 4 seconds asking too much, much less the crime against humanity some here seem to think????????
told you
this “against the rules” talk is fakenews and you have just breached the biggest security loophole in mankind (as opposed to the pen they give out for free or a pair of chopsticks)
the fact that you told them to work is where their attitude comes from.
kaka is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 11:43 pm
  #314  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by Dr. HFH
"Telling them to get you some water"? Try May I have some water, please? instead and perhaps you'll get less attitude.
i did, and thats where i got the attitude. perhaps you can teach the mandarin speaking crew how to behave instead of making assumptions.

perhaps its best not to assume paraphrases are how messages here are represented.

it also shows how the quality of cx crew has declined, from the southeast asian/east asian crew to mk airlines to these manadarin speaking crew

Last edited by kaka; Feb 18, 2019 at 11:58 pm
kaka is offline  
Old Feb 18, 2019, 11:49 pm
  #315  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by moondog
I agree that CX could have done a better job of making interim arrangements for shower facilities during the refurb of the Arrival. BUT, there isn't a single person on this forum who can't afford to pay for a shower. The MOST important point here is that going landside from departures throws a wrench in the system (i.e. the industrial engineers didn't include cheapskates in their calculus). Yes, it's important to be able to exit in emergency situations. Anyone who intentionally tries to play this game deserves a 90+ minute wait.
mate, lucky you dont run cx or else even f pax will get y treatment and crew would scream at every passenger. because everyone can afford the thing they want (water/wine/snack/towel) and throws a wrench in their laziness

before someone named within AA/CX actually says its illegal, seems like no rules were breached as long as theres an intent to fly. multiple CX staff that must have been documented in CX logs have confirmed so.

Last edited by kaka; Feb 19, 2019 at 12:05 am
kaka is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.