Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Cathay Pacific | Cathay
Reload this Page >

How does CX decide its flight numbers?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

How does CX decide its flight numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2014, 9:53 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: BA CX
Posts: 47
How does CX decide its flight numbers?

I've always wondered how CX decides its new flight numbers

For example

we have CX 250-CX257, but when they introduced the 5th daily service, it was CX238/239 instead of CX258/259 (probably because it doesn't sound lucky in chinese?)

CX200-299 has traditionally been European destinations, but now we have CX 357/358 for MAN (which doesn't sound great in chinese either!) and CX 383/382 for ZRH. I wonder why they didn't use something like CX 228/218 etc for these new destinations?

Any thoughts?
bacx is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 3:15 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-EP, TK-*G, HL-DM, HY-GLO, MR-LTP
Posts: 25,932
At least its not CX 458 !
Guy Betsy is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 4:29 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Tokyo, Vancouver, Hong Kong, Dublin
Programs: CX DM
Posts: 880
I am still wondering why CX changed its YVR-HKG flight number from the lovely CX 839 to CX 837. No timing changes accompanied the number change ...
marcuslai is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 5:22 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,377
Originally Posted by bacx
CX200-299 has traditionally been European destinations, but now we have CX 357/358 for MAN (which doesn't sound great in chinese either!) and CX 383/382 for ZRH. I wonder why they didn't use something like CX 228/218 etc for these new destinations?
maortega15 mentioned before they were looking for an 8 for (MAN? or ZRH?)

Maybe because these two new routes are deemed as 'secondary' markets, CX decided to start utilizing the 3XX series...anticipating further growth?
CanucksHKG is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 7:30 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, Costa Rica
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum
Posts: 1,894
Could those of us not in the know get a little lesson on why some numbers are good and others not? I know that 8 is an auspicious number.

I am still wondering why CX changed its YVR-HKG flight number from the lovely CX 839 to CX 837
At least its not CX 458 !
SJOGuy is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 7:37 pm
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/6.0 Mobile/10B142 Safari/8536.25)

258= easy(2) no(5) properity(8) 259 isnt used too as a result (pairs with 258). Then again. 253 is also used

Curious why 21x and 22x isnt used tho
kaka is offline  
Old May 21, 2014, 11:35 pm
  #7  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,377
Originally Posted by bacx
I wonder why they didn't use something like CX 228/218 etc for these new destinations?
Originally Posted by kaka
Curious why 21x and 22x isnt used tho
Future 6th...7th...8th daily HKGLHR?
CanucksHKG is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 12:40 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX Diamond / SQ Gold / Bonvoy Platinum / Hyatt Globalist / Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,098
Originally Posted by SJOGuy
Could those of us not in the know get a little lesson on why some numbers are good and others not? I know that 8 is an auspicious number.
458 = die no prosperity

58 (no prosperity) is bad enough. at least you're alive.

458 (dying with no prosperity) is worse.
Psychiatrist is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 12:43 am
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by CanucksHKG
Future 6th...7th...8th daily HKGLHR?
by then it'd be cheaper to run an A380 5 times daily... and there's still 4 sets with 20x 21x 22x
kaka is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 12:47 am
  #10  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: HKG
Programs: A3, TK *G; JL JGC; SPG,Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,952
Originally Posted by Psychiatrist
458 = die no prosperity

58 (no prosperity) is bad enough. at least you're alive.

458 (dying with no prosperity) is worse.
they definitely did/do not run this so taiwan or tokyo :P
kaka is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 1:50 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,377
Originally Posted by kaka
by then it'd be cheaper to run an A380 5 times daily... and there's still 4 sets with 20x 21x 22x
It was an exaggeration. Who knows if they will ever add a 2nd daily FRA/AMS/MXP/FCO etc... or third CDG...


There's a few - but interesting CX also doesn't use too many X00 and X01 too.
CanucksHKG is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 5:57 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, Costa Rica
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum
Posts: 1,894
Thanks. Interesting.
SJOGuy is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 2:51 pm
  #13  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Programs: BA CX
Posts: 47
Originally Posted by SJOGuy
Could those of us not in the know get a little lesson on why some numbers are good and others not? I know that 8 is an auspicious number.
1 sounds like "must"
2 "easy"
3 "birth/life"
4 "death"
5 "not"
6 "road" in context of 168 - one road to prosperity
7 - if mispronounced sounds like a male organ
8 - wealth
9 - enough

So good flight numbers are 828/838/888... etc no surprise these are the YYZ/YVR/JFK flights.
bacx is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 3:21 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Jose, Costa Rica
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum
Posts: 1,894
Originally Posted by bacx
7 - if mispronounced sounds like a male organ
Hahaha. Thank you.
SJOGuy is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 4:15 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Little dot in Asia
Programs: AA-EP, TK-*G, HL-DM, HY-GLO, MR-LTP
Posts: 25,932
I thought 7 would mean 'definite' as it sounds similar to 10.

BTW, these phonetics work best in Cantonese. In Mandarin, it just sounds a bit strange...except for 8 of course.
Guy Betsy is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.