![]() |
Originally Posted by tauphi
(Post 36078427)
They can't do that because ferry passengers are not allowed into Hong Kong. If such a path existed then a ferry passenger could simply enter the departure zone and then enter Hong Kong against the rules.
Then it’ll be same treatment as any transit passenger who attempts to enter HK without needed visa/permit. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 36078253)
I mean trying to leave the security-cleared gate area, rather than the general transit area (which arriving passengers will have to leave thru to enter the country anyway).
|
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 36078451)
Such a passenger will return to arrivals immigration, if such a gate is allowed to exist from secured area.
Then it’ll be same treatment as any transit passenger who attempts to enter HK without needed visa/permit. Similarly, no passengers entering the airport from Hong Kong can access the ferry service. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 36076908)
I see where you come from.
I'm struggling to come up with a reason why airports don't build such door/path. They just don't. Can you name an international airport with centralised (not gate) security who has such a door? I can't. I can think of only one reason. Restricted area is meant to be a secured area. It may be seen as an impairment to security if there is an easy way to get out and back into such a facaility - the number of times passengers can move through the secured area should be minimised. Are you trying to catch a lapse at the security checkpoint, for instance. I don't have any ICAO doc to back this up (c.f. I can't cite any ICAO doc https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/hong...l ). Hoping someone can point me to security recommendations/best practices/requirements to either prove or disprove my point. (I think this hypothesis also supports why Leung Chung-Yan was not quickly returned to arrivals to retrieve her bag in the 2016 incident, rather, her bag was brought to her). Similarly, in security at gate airports like KUL/SIN T1-T3, is it easy to exit the security area? Another reason could be that arriving passengers pay fees and taxes that are not charged to transit passengers. These are paid on tickets that aren't considered connections. NRT once had such a system. Connecting passengers were allowed to go landside to visit landside lounger but then were forced to pay an additional approximately 3,000 yen departure tax in cash (only!) before re-entering the airside departures area of the terminal. |
Originally Posted by tauphi
(Post 36078462)
No I'm not talking about whether the person can enter Hong Kong per se. The rule is that any passenger that arrives by ferry must leave Hong Kong on a flight, even if they are a permanent resident in Hong Kong. You're not allowed to enter Hong Kong through the ferry that goes to the airport.
Similarly, no passengers entering the airport from Hong Kong can access the ferry service. That is a HKG peculiarity though, an airport with a sterile connection. Doesn't explain why stand-alone airports like TPE and SYD international terminals (again, have exit controls and departure-arrival segregation) don't have such a gate, nor otherwise make the process easy. |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 36078470)
Another reason could be that arriving passengers pay fees and taxes that are not charged to transit passengers. These are paid on tickets that aren't considered connections. NRT once had such a system. Connecting passengers were allowed to go landside to visit landside lounger but then were forced to pay an additional approximately 3,000 yen departure tax in cash (only!) before re-entering the airside departures area of the terminal.
I think your NRT case is more exception than norm. If I enter the UK in LHR T5 during a LHR connection, just to make use of First Wing as a faster security point, my connecting BP is not going to beep at the private security and APD will be demanded of me.
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 36078470)
A reason might be that people in the departures area have access to duty free stores. If they then enter the country, they could give duty free merchandise to locals. Many countries (such as USA) have rules that you can bring in merchandise acquired abroad as duty free, but in principle you cannot purchase duty free in a USA airport before departure, take it abroad with you, and then bring it back unused to the USA without the rules saying that you must declare it and pay taxes.
|
In the previous NRT case, it might have technically been a departure tax that wasn't charged to passengers connecting at NRT. However, once someone entered Japan, they were then considered a departing passenger rather than a transit passenger and forced to pay the tax that wasn't included in their (connecting) ticket. IIRC at the beginning, departing passengers paid the tax of about 3,000 yen in cash as part of the check in and exit passport control procedure, then it was included in the ticket price for departing (but not connecting) passengers. Technically, I didn't pay it to enter the country, but I was forced to pay it before my next flight if I had entered the country. If I had abandoned the remainder of my ticket/PNR, I don't think there would have been any way for Japan to force me to pay the 3,000 yen, but of course I wouldn't have had a permanent residence visa and there aren't many practical ways to leave Japan without taking an international flight.
|
OK but I don't think it exists now.
I just generated a HKG-HND-LHR r/t fare, HND is overnight. Don't see a JP departure tax: I've actually exited the restricted area (NRT tho, not HND) on such a overnight and JL check in next day didn't ask for any departure tax. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...3eff62f078.png |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 36078470)
A reason might be that people in the departures area have access to duty free stores. If they then enter the country, they could give duty free merchandise to locals. Many countries (such as USA) have rules that you can bring in merchandise acquired abroad as duty free, but in principle you cannot purchase duty free in a USA airport before departure, take it abroad with you, and then bring it back unused to the USA without the rules saying that you must declare it and pay taxes.
Another reason could be that arriving passengers pay fees and taxes that are not charged to transit passengers. These are paid on tickets that aren't considered connections. NRT once had such a system. Connecting passengers were allowed to go landside to visit landside lounger but then were forced to pay an additional approximately 3,000 yen departure tax in cash (only!) before re-entering the airside departures area of the terminal. Airport shops here are almost always more expensive than in local shops |
Originally Posted by oldchinahand
(Post 36078763)
Hong Kong has no duty or sales tax
|
I think it is rather odd that you cannot leave or that leaving would get you in any trouble. The customs argument is a strange one because you would obviously pass through customs after clearing immigration where you would need to declare your duty free purchases.
In the EU there are many airports where you can transit between Schengen / non-Schengen at will. In London you can exit, but might have to wait at the info desk (or do the T5 shuttle trick mentioned above). I understand why airports (and customs) want to discourage such things but find it strange that they would outright forbid it. After all, changing your mind is not against the law. I suspect OP got unlucky with the person that they asked or framed the question in a way that made it very easy to say no. Tldr; save yourself the trouble and go out first, but I have trouble believing that anyone would hold you against your will if you really had to go out. |
Originally Posted by Freddorick
(Post 36078869)
In the EU there are many airports where you can transit between Schengen / non-Schengen at will.
LHR is a bit of a hack that's probably going to get plugged the more we talk about it. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 36078878)
Which ones? Exit from non-Schengen departure secure area not that obvious to me in MUC, AGP or ARN.
LHR is a bit of a hack that's probably going to get plugged the more we talk about it. The thing to note is that this mostly works when no human contact is involved. If you have to see an agent, then they might be unwilling to let you go from Schengen to Non-Schengen for the puposes of “lounge hopping”, but they can’t stop you on the way back as long as you hold an EU passport. And I suspect the same applies if you hold a valid visa and have a sufficiently long layover. I don’t think LHR is a hack. You are a passenger, not a prisoner. I’m sure that the airport would like it otherwise though, after all they would rather that you spend your money in the terminal. |
Originally Posted by PaulC852
(Post 36078824)
As usual, you are wrong. There is duty on tobacco, and on all beverages with an alcohol content greater than 30%.
Yes some minor tax as you point out and I had forgotten -so apologies However the broad thrust of my post stands in the context of this thread |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 36076908)
Similarly, in security at gate airports like KUL/SIN T1-T3, is it easy to exit the security area? Even had a chance to visit a PP lounge in SIN upon arrival using my arriving boarding pass. Spent 3 hours to freshen up and head straight to immigration. I just don't know the policy if you are a departing passenger from SIN then all of a sudden decided to forfeit your trip (felt sick) and head back to immigration. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.