Covid-19 coronavirus - effect on Cathay Pacific
#796
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Programs: DL PM - IC RA - HHonors Gold - Hertz Gold - AA - US - CO - Choice Privileges
Posts: 1,661
Sorry to say but I have two long hauls in May ORD-HKG and HKG-LHR still booked but... I have booked alternatives on JL. At this point CX is like a game of roulette.
On the positive side, hotels with whom I had no change, no refund reservations are making exceptions.
On the positive side, hotels with whom I had no change, no refund reservations are making exceptions.
#797
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal (ONT), PVD/BOS, JAX, RSW
Programs: AA/US PlatPro & 1.05MM, DL Plat (challenge), UA dirt
Posts: 3,189
In this case it is AA who re-routed you. You seem lucky since https://saleslink.aa.com/en-US/blog/...ulechange.html says "AA/AA* must be over the water" and "Other [non-oneworld] Airline is not allowed unless rebooked on same routing, inventory, and carrier that is on the 001 ticket." They gave you both the PR flight and QR prime for TATL.
On the return, we held off calling in, until the HKG-LAX dropped off of our itinerary completely. When we called in, the EXP agent said, "just tell me which way you want to go, and I'll book it." The return was easier to change was that there were more airlines out of MNL compared to CEB. Although, QR is going to be starting DOH-CEB on April 8.
#798
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 122
I got one the following Saturday and the exact same thing happened to me, CX899 -> CX845. For my flight the flight is getting emptier day by day but it's more likely because people are just cancelling in general I feel. I doubt they would move us to another flight and then cancel it (I may be speaking too soon here though!)
#801
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 415
Sorry to say but I have two long hauls in May ORD-HKG and HKG-LHR still booked but... I have booked alternatives on JL. At this point CX is like a game of roulette.
On the positive side, hotels with whom I had no change, no refund reservations are making exceptions.
On the positive side, hotels with whom I had no change, no refund reservations are making exceptions.
#803
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: HKG/HND/OOL
Programs: QF Emerald. SQ Gold.
Posts: 3,170
those whatever millions they spent to convert to 10 abrests really worked well for them. At least in tough times had they kept their market edge with a roomier cattle class, they may have the marketing edge into U or V shape rebound if it happens. but so far they have nothing to offer the marginal buyers.
all these "it wasnt predictable" non sense is just excuses. CEOs and board are handsomely paid to mitigate all sorts of risks or plan for worst. but hey, it must have been an unforeseenable act of god so its not their fault
i guess liquidity problem will get hold of them before solvency problem. use up your asiamiles now, dont hold back. those fiat currency can go anytime for survival.
all these "it wasnt predictable" non sense is just excuses. CEOs and board are handsomely paid to mitigate all sorts of risks or plan for worst. but hey, it must have been an unforeseenable act of god so its not their fault
i guess liquidity problem will get hold of them before solvency problem. use up your asiamiles now, dont hold back. those fiat currency can go anytime for survival.
#804
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: AA EXP, SPG PLT, Carlson/HHonors GLD, National Ex, Hertz Gld, AMEX Plat
Posts: 344
A moving target to say the least. The more concerning issue is the short notice cancellations, cancellations hours prior to departure. The adventure planned mid March is award travel with partner flights. The flight options are decreasing and the award travel flight options are increasing more so.
#806
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: LCA/KUL/RGN
Programs: RJ Gold, AZ E+, Air Asia Platinum
Posts: 2,189
Slightly off-topic, but I hope it helps the folks who are being disrupted these days. There is a myth that the airline can not touch bookings made via OTAs until 24 hours before the first flight. I, myself believed that this was the case as well until 2 of my itineraries got involuntary reroutes.
1. RJ LCA-AMM-HKG and return
RJ reduces frequency from 4 to 2 weekly on the AMM-BKK-HKG route and shifted my outbound to a day later. My trip was booked via OTA and the RJ Cyprus office proactively called me and started offering various options. I asked them to reroute me on QR (they said no way), or CX via BKK (they checked with AMM and said this was authorised). A few days later, they also cancelled my HKG-AMM and I got rebooked on CX again. In both cases, RJ did not even try to send me to the OTA and performed all changes themselves.
2. MH HKG-KUL-PEN and return
MH cancelled my KUL-HKG and HKG-KUL flights and protected me on flights that would not work for me as I would miss the connection from HKG (on a separate ticket). This trip was booked with trip.com and I could change my flights directly on the website, but only to MH ones. I asked trip.com if they can ask MH to protect me on direct KA. They said MH will automatically reject this request and then I can try contacting MH directly.
I called MH who initially told me to contact trip.com, but after I told them that trip.com asked me to contact MH, the agent said "okay, but any further changes should be performed via us directly than". In the end, the agent spoke to someone in another department and told me they can work with me to protect me on any other MH flight, but they will not rebook me on KA. I cancelled the MH ticket (full refund due to invol reroute) and booked a KA one, which was like 50USD more expensive.
The moral of the story is that the airline can touch your booking at any time. The question is whether they wish to do that.
1. RJ LCA-AMM-HKG and return
RJ reduces frequency from 4 to 2 weekly on the AMM-BKK-HKG route and shifted my outbound to a day later. My trip was booked via OTA and the RJ Cyprus office proactively called me and started offering various options. I asked them to reroute me on QR (they said no way), or CX via BKK (they checked with AMM and said this was authorised). A few days later, they also cancelled my HKG-AMM and I got rebooked on CX again. In both cases, RJ did not even try to send me to the OTA and performed all changes themselves.
2. MH HKG-KUL-PEN and return
MH cancelled my KUL-HKG and HKG-KUL flights and protected me on flights that would not work for me as I would miss the connection from HKG (on a separate ticket). This trip was booked with trip.com and I could change my flights directly on the website, but only to MH ones. I asked trip.com if they can ask MH to protect me on direct KA. They said MH will automatically reject this request and then I can try contacting MH directly.
I called MH who initially told me to contact trip.com, but after I told them that trip.com asked me to contact MH, the agent said "okay, but any further changes should be performed via us directly than". In the end, the agent spoke to someone in another department and told me they can work with me to protect me on any other MH flight, but they will not rebook me on KA. I cancelled the MH ticket (full refund due to invol reroute) and booked a KA one, which was like 50USD more expensive.
The moral of the story is that the airline can touch your booking at any time. The question is whether they wish to do that.
#807
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
The majority of OTA customers aren’t elites and have to suffer when events like these happen.
#808
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,800
those whatever millions they spent to convert to 10 abrests really worked well for them. At least in tough times had they kept their market edge with a roomier cattle class, they may have the marketing edge into U or V shape rebound if it happens. but so far they have nothing to offer the marginal buyers.
i) The captive market: us lot that have to suffer 11-abreast on peak days if they can manage it
ii) The transit market: the dirt cheap lot (and the lot expecting the earth when the slightest things go wrong https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...s-thereon.html and https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cath...s-thereon.html)
I don't see the discretionary premium travel market much. Or even it does exist, it's so small and/or so hard to pursue, CX gave up trying.
Also 10-abreast is only uncomfortable when full - I reckon it'd be great for travelers now, with the refreshed seats and more than less likely chance of scoring an empty adjacent seat. If they weren't so focused on trying to get voluntary refunds out of Special Ticketing Arrangements they'd enjoy the journey.
#809
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 409
Dilemma; I’m trying to book flights for my parents to visit in May (KUL-NYC area). Was all set on booking KUL-HKG-EWR but with all the potential cancellations, do folks think I’m better off booking them through another airport? They are elderly and like what they like, and for such a long flight they are most comfortable with Cathay transiting through HKG. I’m not sure what to do.
What would you do?
What would you do?
#810
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TPE / HSZ
Programs: CX GO (=SPH), IHG Diamond Amb, Hertz 5*, Accor, Hilton, National
Posts: 6,437
Slightly off-topic, but I hope it helps the folks who are being disrupted these days. There is a myth that the airline can not touch bookings made via OTAs until 24 hours before the first flight. I, myself believed that this was the case as well until 2 of my itineraries got involuntary reroutes.
1. RJ LCA-AMM-HKG and return
RJ reduces frequency from 4 to 2 weekly on the AMM-BKK-HKG route and shifted my outbound to a day later. My trip was booked via OTA and the RJ Cyprus office proactively called me and started offering various options. I asked them to reroute me on QR (they said no way), or CX via BKK (they checked with AMM and said this was authorised). A few days later, they also cancelled my HKG-AMM and I got rebooked on CX again. In both cases, RJ did not even try to send me to the OTA and performed all changes themselves.
2. MH HKG-KUL-PEN and return
MH cancelled my KUL-HKG and HKG-KUL flights and protected me on flights that would not work for me as I would miss the connection from HKG (on a separate ticket). This trip was booked with trip.com and I could change my flights directly on the website, but only to MH ones. I asked trip.com if they can ask MH to protect me on direct KA. They said MH will automatically reject this request and then I can try contacting MH directly.
I called MH who initially told me to contact trip.com, but after I told them that trip.com asked me to contact MH, the agent said "okay, but any further changes should be performed via us directly than". In the end, the agent spoke to someone in another department and told me they can work with me to protect me on any other MH flight, but they will not rebook me on KA. I cancelled the MH ticket (full refund due to invol reroute) and booked a KA one, which was like 50USD more expensive.
The moral of the story is that the airline can touch your booking at any time. The question is whether they wish to do that.
1. RJ LCA-AMM-HKG and return
RJ reduces frequency from 4 to 2 weekly on the AMM-BKK-HKG route and shifted my outbound to a day later. My trip was booked via OTA and the RJ Cyprus office proactively called me and started offering various options. I asked them to reroute me on QR (they said no way), or CX via BKK (they checked with AMM and said this was authorised). A few days later, they also cancelled my HKG-AMM and I got rebooked on CX again. In both cases, RJ did not even try to send me to the OTA and performed all changes themselves.
2. MH HKG-KUL-PEN and return
MH cancelled my KUL-HKG and HKG-KUL flights and protected me on flights that would not work for me as I would miss the connection from HKG (on a separate ticket). This trip was booked with trip.com and I could change my flights directly on the website, but only to MH ones. I asked trip.com if they can ask MH to protect me on direct KA. They said MH will automatically reject this request and then I can try contacting MH directly.
I called MH who initially told me to contact trip.com, but after I told them that trip.com asked me to contact MH, the agent said "okay, but any further changes should be performed via us directly than". In the end, the agent spoke to someone in another department and told me they can work with me to protect me on any other MH flight, but they will not rebook me on KA. I cancelled the MH ticket (full refund due to invol reroute) and booked a KA one, which was like 50USD more expensive.
The moral of the story is that the airline can touch your booking at any time. The question is whether they wish to do that.
Once the airlin takes over, further changes should be made by the airline to prevent the PNR from being out of sync. In reality, if the PNR is still in sync or if all parties are on Amadeus (TA or OTA and airlines), reservation changes can still be handled by TA or OTA, but ticketing changes can only be performed by the airline.