![]() |
CX return to profitability
HK$2.3bn preliminary profit estimate for 2018, apparently: https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...23-billion-net
|
Excellent news.
It might sound paradoxical, but higher oil prices in 2018 might have helped the results given the hedges. If hedges are marked to market, they will show an accounting gain from 2017. |
Good news, hope their hedging program losses starting to end soon. Oil had been a drag for CX for a while now.
|
Time to fix... stupid IT systemssss/inflight catering/A359 biz cabin and toilet/regional crap biz seats
|
Regional business food and seat is so bad I now hate to use my 50k J to Japan. Can’t go anywhere decent on J with 50k miles. Had a sector in JAL J and I could feel the difference. |
They were always profitable. Swire just chose to transfer a large chunk of that profit directly to themselves (through the fuel hedge) rather than having to share it with CA and other shareholders.
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 30800859)
They were always profitable. Swire just chose to transfer a large chunk of that profit directly to themselves (through the fuel hedge) rather than having to share it with CA and other shareholders.
|
There are plenty of rumours about who was on the other side but i suspect it will never be confirmed.
Either way i think they were all supposed to expire by the end of 2018. |
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 30800859)
They were always profitable. Swire just chose to transfer a large chunk of that profit directly to themselves (through the fuel hedge) rather than having to share it with CA and other shareholders.
|
Originally Posted by christep
(Post 30800859)
They were always profitable. Swire just chose to transfer a large chunk of that profit directly to themselves (through the fuel hedge) rather than having to share it with CA and other shareholders.
|
Certainly the losses in years past were due to CX gambling on fuel prices. No doubt all the other reasons they give are valid, but to a lesser extent. (If you want details look at CX web site, Investors, Accounts or Financial Briefings presentations - everything is there.)
I doubt that Swire was the counterparty. That is the dream of crazy pilots. However I am worried by the continued reference to strong business class demand. In my case (usually from Manila), ticket prices to HK used to be over $950, now I can get $64X for 3 nights in HK. Before I bought cheapo economy or PY and was upgraded to circa 75% of the time. Now I buy I or D. We both win. If CX try to get clever and push up I/D fares I'll revert to my old pattern and wait for upgrades. Similarly MNL to SIN, but MNL to BKK price has taken off so I fly TG. If CX get the prices right the punters will buy. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 7:55 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.