![]() |
AA competition for CX on the LAX route
Strong rumour of American Airlines starting the LAX-HKG route
http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...rican-lax-hkg/ I personally would welcome this. CX fares on this route are very high and I welcome the competition. AAs hard product matches CX so assuming their fares will be much lower I look forward to trying it. |
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 26020618)
I personally would welcome this. CX fares on this route are very high and I welcome the competition. AAs hard product matches CX so assuming their fares will be much lower I look forward to trying it.
|
No CX/AA JV as No Open Skies
As there is no open skies agreement between HK and the US there is no opportunity for a JV. This means code sharing only and which is already in place. There also appears to be no rush to create open skies either, though Fedex is a very vocal proponent.
Which for me is great, especially if the LAX flight comes to fruition. Owing to changes in the MPC I have switched my US flying to AA, though not yet my programme, so any additional AA service increases options and flexibility. Having flown a few times now on AA, I am going to quote the Big Bang Theory 'It was better than I thought it would be'. The food is crap, but the crews are very friendly when engaged. Fingers crossed! Nicc HK |
I expect that AA doesn't serve a mid flight full meal service too!
|
"I expect that AA doesn't serve a mid flight full meal service too!"
I would actually call that a benefit, AA food is probably something Ryanair would pay their passengers to eat to make them suffer more. Everything on AA is not "beef or chicken?" but how much do you like cheese? Why is AA addicted to cheese? But then I avoid eating on planes no matter what the class, or length of journey, but that is just me. Nicc HK |
http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...las-hong-kong/
AA food actually looks decent. And they also cater/budget for mid flight snacks hence negating CX's reason why they need to serve a mid flight meal. |
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 26020618)
Strong rumour of American Airlines starting the LAX-HKG route
http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...rican-lax-hkg/ I personally would welcome this. CX fares on this route are very high and I welcome the competition. AAs hard product matches CX so assuming their fares will be much lower I look forward to trying it. Regards |
Good news indeed, CX needs more competition.
|
Originally Posted by scubadu
(Post 26022890)
Since AA is having very good success on DFW-HKG, what in the world makes you think they will price their fares "much lower" than CX on this route?
Regards |
Originally Posted by Nicc HK
(Post 26022357)
"I expect that AA doesn't serve a mid flight full meal service too!"
I would actually call that a benefit, AA food is probably something Ryanair would pay their passengers to eat to make them suffer more. Everything on AA is not "beef or chicken?" but how much do you like cheese? Why is AA addicted to cheese? But then I avoid eating on planes no matter what the class, or length of journey, but that is just me. Nicc HK
Originally Posted by sxc
(Post 26022432)
http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.c...las-hong-kong/
AA food actually looks decent. And they also cater/budget for mid flight snacks hence negating CX's reason why they need to serve a mid flight meal. |
Originally Posted by 1kBill
(Post 26023117)
Competition and perceived inferior soft product?
Personally, I wouldn't expect "much lower" fares, but I guess time will tell. Regards |
Originally Posted by scubadu
(Post 26027485)
I guess we'll see, but AA doesn't seem to be having a whole lot of trouble filling planes on the Asia routes they have added.
Personally, I wouldn't expect "much lower" fares, but I guess time will tell. Regards Further, due to AAs current lack of capacity on the route ,you gotta presume a decent chunk of the current CX demand on that route are AA "friendly" folks - either elites, corporate contracts, etc. I bet AA has decent business from the codeshares. Presumably CX will lose some business here when AA launches. I dont think its the same as DFW. DFW is an extreme example - there were zero flights to HKG before. LAX is a longstanding, high capacity OW Asia route that has been around for ages, and CX has incrementally increased capacity over the years by adding flights and making tweaks to fill increasing demand (the most recent change coming in 4Q 2015, when CX added ~200 seats weekly by changing equipment a few days per week). The bottle isn't being uncorked here like perhaps DFW was. I'm definitely in the camp who thinks this will have a competitive effect (positive, from consumers' views) on pricing. I agree AA can fill seats, but i think the bigger variable is CX...at what expense does AA filling seats impact CX. I bet it does in a material way, which causes CX to be more cautious with prices. |
i believe some AA friendly folks done LAX NRT HKG in the past and if you factor in connecting flights i assume their fares would be reasonably competitive.
collusion is now illegal in hk with recent introduction of competition ordinance. |
it is quite possible that CX could respond as they usually do by upping their own capacity ( LHR, SIN are just some examples)
5th Daily and more 77G from CX perspective- CX losing the share of the market is more damaging to itself than if AA lost it ( enters and then exists) considering CX has more to lose they should probably fight tooth and nail to kick the competitor off as they have done in the past... |
If this gets confirmed it will be interesting to see what happens to CX.
AA will fill the plane very profitably with AA flyers no problem. I still think lots of the Asian community in LA, and corporates based in LA who frequent HKG, along with transfer traffic beyond HKG will still prefer CX. However CX will stand to lose some of the premium AA traffic as well as connections beyond LAX. There is room for both players, I just hope CX can maintain 4x daily. In a broader term, I do hope one day that there can be an open skies between HKG and USA to allow CX to join the JL/AA JV. It would allow CX and AA to become true partners across the Pacific and a move like this would not be seen as a threat or a competitor. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:48 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.