![]() |
Silver Benefit?
Sometimes I just don't understand CX. The lounges in Hong Kong are already crowded as it is. Why do CX still provide lounge access benefits to Silver members when the general industry norm these days should be only for 50,000 miles per year flyers? I know, I know....I'm a silver as well but still I think maybe CX could instead provide 1/2 lounge access coupons like they do with Asiana? Or is that something totally unfeasible?
|
Rather than cutting benefits to solve capacity issues I for one am happy that CX prefers to increase lounge capacity to cater for this demand.
|
Originally Posted by midlevels
(Post 20476353)
Rather than cutting benefits to solve capacity issues I for one am happy that CX prefers to increase lounge capacity to cater for this demand.
As for lounge, I am still in the camp that CX should try to enforce "capacity control" on OW members to solve capacity issues. CX has does its best to try to increase lounges but that only go so far. |
Originally Posted by Cathay Boy
(Post 20477753)
As for lounge, I am still in the camp that CX should try to enforce "capacity control" on OW members to solve capacity issues. CX has does its best to try to increase lounges but that only go so far.
By design, the oneworld rule limiting access to sapphire/emerald is supposed to serve as a form of capacity control. But I think we suffer for the fact that there is a huge difference in quality between the CX lounges at HKG and any other oneworld option. I gather the BA/QF lounge is nothing to write home about, although I'll give it a try later this week just to see for myself. |
I guess its due to the $50 dollars that MPC charges its initial members, as well as the higher fare that it charges its pax to reach 30,000 miles before using the lounge. I know...now days many people can get that silver status without paying the 50
|
I thought MPC Silver may use the CX lounge only when flying CX or KA but not other OW flights?
|
Originally Posted by Clipper801
(Post 20479270)
I thought MPC Silver may use the CX lounge only when flying CX or KA but not other OW flights?
|
i guess CX needs to offer some benefits to each category - if SL doesn't offer lounge access (when flying on CX/KA economy), then it's really not that much different from GR apart from 10 kg baggage and priority baggage.
keeping lounge access for SL is quite fair. i was lured from GR to SL because of lounge access. then got lured to GO (don't really know how that happened) ... and now to DM! |
As a SL I too am glad that CX maintains the lounge access benefit. I agree that it is generous for an entry-level elite level, but I also agree that it does provide some form of differentiation from GR. Furthermore, us SLs only fly at most 60K miles/40 sectors per year (on average I'd say 40K/30 sectors), so I don't think we'e adding much to the crowding. :cool:
|
Originally Posted by JALlover
(Post 20478150)
I guess its due to the $50 dollars that MPC charges its initial members, as well as the higher fare that it charges its pax to reach 30,000 miles before using the lounge. I know...now days many people can get that silver status without paying the 50
|
Originally Posted by CanucksHKG
(Post 20481541)
Sorry....I'm not quite understanding what you're trying to say? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by CrazyJ82
(Post 20477869)
I gather the BA/QF lounge is nothing to write home about, although I'll give it a try later this week just to see for myself.
|
Originally Posted by CanucksHKG
(Post 20481541)
Sorry....I'm not quite understanding what you're trying to say? :confused:
|
Originally Posted by Psychiatrist
(Post 20479610)
i guess CX needs to offer some benefits to each category - if SL doesn't offer lounge access (when flying on CX/KA economy), then it's really not that much different from GR apart from 10 kg baggage and priority baggage.
keeping lounge access for SL is quite fair. i was lured from GR to SL because of lounge access. then got lured to GO (don't really know how that happened) ... and now to DM! |
Originally Posted by Psychiatrist
(Post 20479610)
i guess CX needs to offer some benefits to each category - if SL doesn't offer lounge access (when flying on CX/KA economy), then it's really not that much different from GR apart from 10 kg baggage and priority baggage.
keeping lounge access for SL is quite fair. i was lured from GR to SL because of lounge access. then got lured to GO (don't really know how that happened) ... and now to DM! I agree with Cathay Boy and others who don't want to see a devaluation in elite status. But would a trade be acceptable? I'd probably forgo lounge access at SL if instead we got RDM tier bonuses. A guy can dream, anyway. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:55 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.