![]() |
Originally Posted by kamiao
(Post 18482743)
I don't think that's the main reason.
1. CX charges more or much more than Chinese airlines, most of the time. 2. There are plenty of non-government backup airlines could offer more than CX. I think airlines under the Virgin umbrella do better than CX. I also don't think you have to be backed up by a government with a huge capital support to fix your toilets in B747s and maintain the cleanness at an acceptable level. |
From the virgin group the only real match to Cathay is probably virgin Atlantic's business class , al other cabins and airlines under that group are not up to the Cathay Standard.
Chinese airline have a lot of money to through around yes but most of them do not even have TV in all their seats and if they do its only in Chinese!!!- I mean if Cathay was more expensive and had worse service then chinese airlines in spite of for some strange reason having better hard and soft products than the chinese airlines, why are people still flying Cathay , why is it that Air China China southern and China eastern constantly need money and not Cathay!!!!!!! Or are you saying people in China are so stupid they fly Cathay or dragonair to china at a higher prices and a lower service If anything the service standard has to be higher!!!!!! And yes Hong Kong is a CX hub but the chinese airlines also have their own hubs that cover more international longhaul destinations than cathay. Also Cathay seems to among full service airlines be doing the best in southeast asia , Singapore airlines in the last four years has just lost market share in its home market and is struggling to fight against it competitiors!!! |
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
From the virgin group the only real match to Cathay is probably virgin Atlantic's business class , al other cabins and airlines under that group are not up to the Cathay Standard.
Their new UC ("Dream Suite") is a reincarnation of CX's coffin class with "opaque panels" http://www.ausbt.com.au/photo-tour-v...am-suite-seats . It already has negative TR http://v-flyer.com/forum/index.php?f...rb_v=viewtopic
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
I mean if Cathay was more expensive and had worse service then chinese airlines in spite of for some strange reason having better hard and soft products than the chinese airlines, why are people still flying Cathay , why is it that Air China China southern and China eastern constantly need money and not Cathay!!!!!!!
And the goodwill factor that makes some HK people always fly CX (like my parents) no matter what the objective evidence is. Same reason my boss always banks at HSBC I guess (even tho the fees are so high).
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
And yes Hong Kong is a CX hub but the chinese airlines also have their own hubs that cover more international longhaul destinations than cathay.
Also, MCT for some PRC ports are atrocious (e.g. PEK http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/miles...-time-pek.html). Might be more convenient to simply pass through HK. PRC-International fares have more discounts but aren't that much lower than CX for peak travel.
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
Also Cathay seems to among full service airlines be doing the best in southeast asia , Singapore airlines in the last four years has just lost market share in its home market and is struggling to fight against it competitiors!!!
I guess CX is still a top airline overall but the advantage it has over other airlines is shrinking, and other airlines can offer better service on individual routes. |
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
From the virgin group the only real match to Cathay is probably virgin Atlantic's business class , al other cabins and airlines under that group are not up to the Cathay Standard.
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
I mean if Cathay was more expensive and had worse service then chinese airlines in spite of for some strange reason having better hard and soft products than the chinese airlines, why are people still flying Cathay , why is it that Air China China southern and China eastern constantly need money and not Cathay!!!!!!!
I don't see the logical linkage between CX's fare and service and the demand of fund injection of Chinese airlines in your comment. Mind to clarify what you try to say?
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
Or are you saying people in China are so stupid they fly Cathay or dragonair to china at a higher prices and a lower service
If anything the service standard has to be higher!!!!!!
Originally Posted by Kachjc
(Post 18483773)
And yes Hong Kong is a CX hub but the chinese airlines also have their own hubs that cover more international longhaul destinations than cathay.
Also Cathay seems to among full service airlines be doing the best in southeast asia , Singapore airlines in the last four years has just lost market share in its home market and is struggling to fight against it competitiors!!! |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 18484037)
PRC-International fares have more discounts but aren't that much lower than CX for peak travel.
|
How many Mainlanders will fly SYD-LAX? It's for Yanks and Aussies. What dates are you searching for anyway?
Sample peak season fares 14 Jul-29 Jul direct to SYD (all fares exclude tax and surcharges): priceline.com.hk QF ex HKG: HK$6,380 priceline.com.hk CX ex HKG: HK$9,690 ctrip.com CA ex PEK (13 Jul dep): RMB8,410 ctrip.com MU ex PVG: RMB8,490 ctrip.com CZ ex CAN: RMB8,020 Anything's cheaper once you're not involving the home port anyway. TPE-SYD on CX J for those dates costs HK$16.4K whereas HKG-SYD direct costs HK$30K for those dates. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 18484222)
How many Mainlanders will fly SYD-LAX? It's for Yanks and Aussies. What dates are you searching for anyway?
Sample peak season fares 14 Jul-29 Jul direct to SYD (all fares exclude tax and surcharges): priceline.com.hk QF ex HKG: HK$6,380 priceline.com.hk CX ex HKG: HK$9,690 ctrip.com CA ex PEK (13 Jul dep): RMB8,410 ctrip.com MU ex PVG: RMB8,490 ctrip.com CZ ex CAN: RMB8,020 Anything's cheaper once you're not involving the home port anyway. TPE-SYD on CX J for those dates costs HK$16.4K whereas HKG-SYD direct costs HK$30K for those dates. Anything's cheaper once you are not involving the home port? Ummm... SYD-LAX certainly doesn't start from home port of CX... why it's so expensive? It almost 1.5x the fare QF offers...which involves it home port. I randomly picked up the below fare: ex SYD-LAX: 18July2012/27July2012 QF:AUD2227, CX:AUD3347. Also ex SYD-JFK: same date, QF:AUD2532, CX:AUD 3740. |
Originally Posted by kamiao
(Post 18484300)
See your point. Thanks.
Anything's cheaper once you are not involving the home port? Ummm... SYD-LAX certainly doesn't start from home port of CX... why it's so expensive? It almost 1.5x the fare QF offers...which involves it home port. I randomly picked up the below fare: ex SYD-LAX: 18July2012/27July2012 QF:AUD2227, CX:AUD3347. Also ex SYD-JFK: same date, QF:AUD2532, CX:AUD 3740. QF is going on a fire sale on its international routes...so much so I'm starting to feel bad ticketing my Sep trip to Syd on CX with AM (but I have to burn my miles somehow). But the PRC carriers and Cathay are not following suit - suggests they think they have some staying power with their home-base customers. |
Originally Posted by percysmith
(Post 18484349)
Compared to buying seperate tickets from SYD-HKG, HKG-LAX.
QF is going on a fire sale on its international routes...so much so I'm starting to feel bad ticketing my Sep trip to Syd on CX with AM (but I have to burn my miles somehow). But the PRC carriers and Cathay are not following suit - suggests they think they have some staying power with their home-base customers. It's not only 1.5x more expensive than QF... it's also 1.5x more expensive than AA, which runs SYD-NRT-LAX-NRT-SYD while SYD-NRT is JL... QF's fare to US is sold at a consistent price throughout the year. If you are bored with CX, you can try a trip to Syd by QF on its A380 with AM. Impressive according to colleagues. |
At the Pier now, and I saw someone walk up to the bar and ask for bottled water. The attendant gave him a small bottle of Bonaqua. :D
|
Originally Posted by kesler.go
(Post 18510507)
At the Pier now, and I saw someone walk up to the bar and ask for bottled water. The attendant gave him a small bottle of Bonaqua. :D
I bet that's the direction CX heads to. |
go ask for "a bottle of evian"
and see if they have it :) |
In the Wing now and there are bottles of bonaqua 500 ml
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.