FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Cathay Pacific | Cathay (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay-487/)
-   -   Is CX that bad? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cathay-pacific-cathay/1061218-cx-bad.html)

toyotaboy95 Mar 11, 2010 7:36 pm


Originally Posted by arthursiew (Post 13555312)
AK quoted me 4930HKD for 3 people while MH quoted me 4950HKD for 3 which I found to be a much better deal.

Now that is very expensive. AK quite often has HK$200 fares one-way for this route (though you have to play around with their booking system for dates or use www.airasiaplus.com).

Maybe consider Tiger Airways via SIN?

arthursiew Mar 11, 2010 9:21 pm


Originally Posted by toyotaboy95 (Post 13559850)
Now that is very expensive. AK quite often has HK$200 fares one-way for this route (though you have to play around with their booking system for dates or use www.airasiaplus.com).

Maybe consider Tiger Airways via SIN?

I checked a lot of the dates in June and July and they are all 714HKD one way. Tiger Airways is 495HKD one way, but that would make me wait from 6:30AM to 11:30 plus wait another long time for another flight to KUL. The difference is about 100USD total, so I rather pay 100USD than make the whole entire journey 30+hours.

arthursiew Mar 13, 2010 11:34 am

Price changed today.

CX+3K=$4136

SQ+MH+AK= $4245

Opinions?

oatsmeal Mar 14, 2010 9:09 am


Originally Posted by arthursiew (Post 13569362)
Price changed today.

CX+3K=$4136

SQ+MH+AK= $4245

Opinions?

In FT's spirit, wouldn't you pick SQ for the UA miles? (unless it's a non-mileage accruing fare)

For SFO-HKG, I prefer SQ because (a) the seats have better padding; (b) I will not go hungry on SQ flights; and (c) SQ has upgraded the blankets in Y on the 77W (it's thick and fluffy) and the SQ pillows provide better support.

toyotaboy95 Mar 15, 2010 3:54 am


Originally Posted by oatsmeal (Post 13573274)
(unless it's a non-mileage accruing fare)

I suspect arthursiew's fare is Sweet Deals, which is booked into non-eligible mileage fares. Could OP shed some light on this?

sxc Mar 15, 2010 7:56 am


Originally Posted by arthursiew (Post 13569362)
Price changed today.

CX+3K=$4136

SQ+MH+AK= $4245

Opinions?

Why don't you tell us what are your thoughts? In economy on these airlines, a lot boils down to what is important to you.

arthursiew Mar 15, 2010 9:05 pm


Originally Posted by toyotaboy95 (Post 13577631)
I suspect arthursiew's fare is Sweet Deals, which is booked into non-eligible mileage fares. Could OP shed some light on this?

Yes, this is the Sweet Deal fare. I don't really care for the mileage right now, because we are considering switching to KrisFlyer or Asia Miles/Marco Polo as UA's pricing has been very expensive lately.


Originally Posted by sxc (Post 13578466)
Why don't you tell us what are your thoughts? In economy on these airlines, a lot boils down to what is important to you.

I have not been on SQ for many years, so I always wanted to try them again. However, we don't want to spend so much money for this Summer because we will be going to a lot more places than I specified. Right now, my dad thinks we can get a fare of $1100 all the way to SIN or KUL later this year because of the economy. I hope he's right because I don't want to wait a little later to find out the prices raise.

sxc Mar 15, 2010 9:24 pm

If your main concern is the seats, take SQ. They are slightly better than average Y class seats, you will know what you are getting. CX seats are more radical and you might hate them, tho you might love them.

The price differential is not much.

arthursiew Mar 25, 2010 10:16 pm

Bought tickets with SQ. Much cheaper than CX. CX wanted $1600+/person now. Got SQ tickets for $1232/person ($3698 for three). Good deal?

ryan_stoneworld Mar 25, 2010 11:52 pm


Originally Posted by arthursiew (Post 13650777)
Bought tickets with SQ. Much cheaper than CX. CX wanted $1600+/person now. Got SQ tickets for $1292/person ($3698 for three). Good deal?

Quite a good deal... does it earn you KF miles? better if it does

toyotaboy95 Mar 26, 2010 3:04 am


Originally Posted by arthursiew (Post 13650777)
Bought tickets with SQ. Much cheaper than CX. CX wanted $1600+/person now. Got SQ tickets for $1292/person ($3698 for three). Good deal?

Personally, I find the fare a bit high (but still a good deal in comparison to CX and previous prices), I would think that US$1150 be more reasonable. But then again, you're flying SQ, so the price tends to be a bit higher than others.

Ever considered UA (you can earn EQM) for SFO-HKG-SIN (HKG-SIN is 5th freedom)?

arthursiew Mar 26, 2010 7:32 am


Originally Posted by toyotaboy95 (Post 13651659)
Personally, I find the fare a bit high (but still a good deal in comparison to CX and previous prices), I would think that US$1150 be more reasonable. But then again, you're flying SQ, so the price tends to be a bit higher than others.

Ever considered UA (you can earn EQM) for SFO-HKG-SIN (HKG-SIN is 5th freedom)?

Oops. It's $1232, not $1292. UA wants $1950/person.

QRC3288 Mar 26, 2010 10:17 am

No offense here, but hasn't this been off topic for quite some time now? I also cringe each time when I see the title come up as I think it's rather misleading...the topic seems to be much more now about comparing Y class fare differences


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.