Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > Americas > Canada
Reload this Page >

Air France flight crashed in YYZ

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Air France flight crashed in YYZ

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2005, 4:59 pm
  #286  
At Large
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: oakville Ontario canada;AC*SE
Posts: 16,985
Originally Posted by InTheAirGuy
Flew over the wreck today -- out my window on the left as we came in on a south to north approach -- and it is strikingly massive. When you are about 100 feet above and to the right of the thing, the sheer size, scope, and position in the ravine surely puts it into perspective.

Didn't have my digital, but lots of opportunity for others to get pics.
Yes, saw it also on the same approach this PM;I've not landed often on that runway for whatever reason.
parnel is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2005, 8:16 pm
  #287  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 5,210
Originally Posted by After Burner
Consider this:

In about 5,000 feet of runway (assuming he landed really long) the aircraft was only able to decelerate by 65 mph (from 160 mph to 95 mph - the reported landing speed and speed at which he ran off the runway).

Yet, in only 200 yards he decelerated by 95 mph. There's nothing like a ravine to bring a vehicle to a quick halt.

Now what do suppose might have happened if the ravine wasn't there - just some flat grass with the 401 on the other side of a fence?
I think somewhere in the news it was reported that ground radar shows they accelerated after landing, as if they were trying to go around, but then aborted the aborted landing. Maybe in the rain, they didn't fully realize how far down the runway they really were, and thought they could get it stopped, or realized they couldn't get it back in the air again.

I'm sure the pilots on here can comment on how successful they think trying to reconfigure the aircraft for lift-off in 4000 feet or less in a thunderstorm with a tailwind would be. Also, is it possible that in the final few seconds in the air, they realized they have a tailwind pushing them down the runway, but the best course of action was to land and try to take off again. In other words, could they have safely aborted landing at that stage without pancaking on the runway anyway, given the reported winds?
DanJ is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 12:32 am
  #288  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,443
Ottawa pushes for extra room beyond runways

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl.../BNStory/Front

Transport Canada will soon require all airports to build “safety areas” at the ends of runways to help save lives during overruns, like the one that wrecked an Air France jet Tuesday at Toronto's Pearson International Airport.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 5:57 am
  #289  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,550
Skid marks on runway raise puzzling questions.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servl...tory/National/
airbus320 is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:27 am
  #290  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern Alberta
Posts: 20,550
...and the litigation begins.

http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...uit050806.html
airbus320 is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:30 am
  #291  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chilling with penguins
Posts: 13,043
*sigh*
YOWkid is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:35 am
  #292  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,000
I would like to see AF, Transport and a few others sue some of the passengers on the flight. There were way to many pax taking pictures and taking personal belongings with themselvses. When an a/c slides off the runway and catches fire you get the fk out of the thing.
tracon is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:43 am
  #293  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,797
Originally Posted by tracon
I would like to see AF, Transport and a few others sue some of the passengers on the flight. There were way to many pax taking pictures and taking personal belongings with themselvses. When an a/c slides off the runway and catches fire you get the fk out of the thing.
Agreed on the personal belongings thing.

I am not sure that taking pictures did anyone any harm. If you are there in line waiting to bail out, might as well take pictures? I guess this shows there actually was no real panic.
Stranger is online now  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:44 am
  #294  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: YUL-YQB-BTV
Programs: SPG-Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,345
Originally Posted by DanJ
Someone joked at work this morning that the data would be edited in France to make it look more like the fault of the airport, and less on the pilots LOL. I can see the rhetoric now "Even though the plane touched down halfway down the runway in a rainstorm with a 25 know tailwind, French-built Airbus aircraft are so superior that they can still land and stop in short distances provided their isn't any standing water on the runway."

Maybe YYZ needs to invest in squeegy trucks.
It was exactly the first thought that crossed my mind, them playing with the integrity of the data, specially with the hundreds of millions of dollars at stake. However, listening to Radio-Canada news, I've learned that the data upload will be done (has been done??) in presence of a Canadian inspector from the TSB of Transports Canada.
Super Larry is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:47 am
  #295  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: YUL-YQB-BTV
Programs: SPG-Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,345
Originally Posted by Stranger
Agreed on the personal belongings thing.

I am not sure that taking pictures did anyone any harm. If you are there in line waiting to bail out, might as well take pictures? I guess this shows there actually was no real panic.
And that might make some of the arguments irrelevants, as a good lawyer for GTAA or AF will make sure that those who took the photographs are thorougly questioned about their "panic" perception...
Super Larry is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:52 am
  #296  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYZ
Programs: BA Gold/Marriott Gold/HH Diamond/IC Plat Amba
Posts: 5,988
While I agree that there should be some compensation for the pax involved. Loss of documents, luggage and certainly mental distress are all reasonable claims but were do you get off asking $75M+. Maybe an option for 2 RTW tickets in F and lifetime FB Platinum status for any FT'ers involved. j/k
Crampedin13A is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 9:57 am
  #297  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: YYC
Posts: 23,797
Originally Posted by Super Larry
It was exactly the first thought that crossed my mind, them playing with the integrity of the data, specially with the hundreds of millions of dollars at stake. However, listening to Radio-Canada news, I've learned that the data upload will be done (has been done??) in presence of a Canadian inspector from the TSB of Transports Canada.

French press still talks about "weather" as the main cause. The GM article was interesting in that there was implicit speculation on the two pilots possibly disagreeing on the go around thing. Which sounds like a distinct possibility.
Stranger is online now  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 10:21 am
  #298  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salish Sea
Programs: DL,AC,HH,PC
Posts: 8,974
Originally Posted by After Burner
Now what do suppose might have happened if the ravine wasn't there - just some flat grass with the 401 on the other side of a fence?
Considering there would have been about 1km of 'flat grass' before meeting the 401, I imagine the airplane would have remained upright and come to a (rapid and somewhat uncomfortable) stop. Maybe a gear collapse, remote possibility of fire, but much preferable to what actually happened.

Hint: look at a map, don't trust the media.
Wally Bird is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 10:27 am
  #299  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: YEG
Programs: HH Silver
Posts: 56,443
http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2005.../f109.raw.html

Just minutes after an Air France jet crashed in Toronto earlier this week during a storm, a second plane signalled it might be in trouble.
tcook052 is offline  
Old Aug 6, 2005, 10:54 am
  #300  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: YHZ
Programs: Sans souci
Posts: 2,190
Originally Posted by tcook052
http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2005.../f109.raw.html

Just minutes after an Air France jet crashed in Toronto earlier this week during a storm, a second plane signalled it might be in trouble.
An "Air Scare" for KLM? Sounds like a pilot on top of his work.

Eva Hoare forgot the obligatory interviews with confused/fightened/dazed passengers and their anxious/concerned/angry relatives waiting patiently/or with deepening anxiety in Toronto; obviously she should have used the Lazy Journalists Plane Story Generator.
AnselmAdorne is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.