Handling of returning Canadian travelers in the COVID era
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2015
Location: BOS, YVR, ZRH
Programs: *G
Posts: 17,384
It is. At least in case of my employer. Only field workers that really have to travel to work site were declared essential. And we are still harassed by the authorities and have to undergo covid testing. I had 3 tests done in last 10 days. And further tests are on the horizon. I'm actually getting fed up. Do I care if somebody won't get water of will get flooded with sewage? For now yes, but with every post as yours my doubts are growing stronger.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Earth. Residency:HKG formerly:YYZ
Programs: CX, DL, Nexus/GE, APEC
Posts: 10,684
#48
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YXU
Programs: AC SE100K, National E/E, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond, MB, Avis PC
Posts: 965
Yeah, sure. Approximately 3 hours waiting for the covid tests in YXU. 2 hours standing at partial sun for the covid test in Hamilton, BM. Do you want to pay me for this time? I'll PM you the address where you can send the cheque. It is for your safety after all.
#49
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: YXU
Programs: AC SE100K, National E/E, HH Diamond, IHG Diamond, MB, Avis PC
Posts: 965
Back to the topic: It is time to stop this idiotic blanket ban on international travel. Travelers from countries with much lower incidence rates than Canada are banned from entering the country and Canadians entering from these countries are subject to quarantine. I'm surprised that some of these countries are allowing Canadians to enter and don't maintain reciprocity.
#50
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
Tight border controls are part of why Canada is ahead of many other nations on virus management. Dropping our guard is an invitation to be the next Florida.
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2015
Location: BOS, YVR, ZRH
Programs: *G
Posts: 17,384
Are you willing to pay for the missed work of everyone who has to quarantine should you get sick and not have a test before coming to Canada and who's unlucky enough to have interacted with you after that?
#52
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: YYZ
Programs: AAdvantage, Aeroplan, Flying Blue
Posts: 662
"Essential workers" who find the testing regime too onerous or time consuming should take compensation requests to their employers. Should they be self-employed they should add it to their invoices or consider it the cost of doing business. Failing that there is always CERB. Regardless of how indispensable one worker imagines himself to be he can be replaced.
Tight border controls are part of why Canada is ahead of many other nations on virus management. Dropping our guard is an invitation to be the next Florida.
Tight border controls are part of why Canada is ahead of many other nations on virus management. Dropping our guard is an invitation to be the next Florida.
I get the feeling that some Canadians want to maintain the current strict limitations on international travelers until, like New Zealand, we reach a state of zero community infection for an extended period of time (and even New Zealand has had a recent uptick in cases) or until an effective vaccine is widely available. This is not realistic and should not be our objective. C19 is going to continue to circulate in the Canadian population and there is absolutely nothing we can do to stop it. That much should be abundantly clear. Our objective should be to limit the spread so that infections don't again threaten to overwhelm the Canadian health care system. In addition, we need to do a better job of protecting vulnerable Canadians (the elderly for example, and immuno-compromised individuals) than we did in March and April. But we should not be treating the entire population as "vulnerable", which is what we are doing in effect with the current international travel restrictions.
We have friends originally from France who will be traveling there (from Toronto) in a few weeks for vacation. They will not be obliged to self-quarantine when they enter France but under current rules they will have to do so when they return to Canada. Understandably, the French government is asking the Canadian government for a reciprocal arrangement and I'd be surprised if there were not other governments doing the same. The Canadian government should respond appropriately by starting to loosen the blanket quarantine requirement, at least for travelers coming from selected countries. And I believe that the Canadian government should make it easier for Canadian business travelers to return from all international destinations by putting into place a clearer framework. We need to stop the crap shoot.
None of this would be inconsistent with the primary objective of limiting the spread of C19 in Canada.
#53
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Programs: Aeroplan, IHG, Enterprise, Avios, Nexus
Posts: 8,355
I don't think anyone is suggesting that we just "drop our guard" on international travelers. But WildcatYXU is right in stating that Canada needs to move away from a blanket travel ban with exceptions considered on a one-off basis (more or less a crap shoot, as I recall someone saying in an earlier post). International business travel is necessary and legitimate, and cannot be throttled indefinitely. Regular international business travelers like WildcatYXU and me are going to have a heck of a time making it work under the current scheme whereby we have to beg for an exemption every time we re-enter Canada. CERB is not an alternative, at least not for me!
I get the feeling that some Canadians want to maintain the current strict limitations on international travelers until, like New Zealand, we reach a state of zero community infection for an extended period of time (and even New Zealand has had a recent uptick in cases) or until an effective vaccine is widely available. This is not realistic and should not be our objective. C19 is going to continue to circulate in the Canadian population and there is absolutely nothing we can do to stop it. That much should be abundantly clear. Our objective should be to limit the spread so that infections don't again threaten to overwhelm the Canadian health care system. In addition, we need to do a better job of protecting vulnerable Canadians (the elderly for example, and immuno-compromised individuals) than we did in March and April. But we should not be treating the entire population as "vulnerable", which is what we are doing in effect with the current international travel restrictions.
We have friends originally from France who will be traveling there (from Toronto) in a few weeks for vacation. They will not be obliged to self-quarantine when they enter France but under current rules they will have to do so when they return to Canada. Understandably, the French government is asking the Canadian government for a reciprocal arrangement and I'd be surprised if there were not other governments doing the same. The Canadian government should respond appropriately by starting to loosen the blanket quarantine requirement, at least for travelers coming from selected countries. And I believe that the Canadian government should make it easier for Canadian business travelers to return from all international destinations by putting into place a clearer framework. We need to stop the crap shoot.
None of this would be inconsistent with the primary objective of limiting the spread of C19 in Canada.
I get the feeling that some Canadians want to maintain the current strict limitations on international travelers until, like New Zealand, we reach a state of zero community infection for an extended period of time (and even New Zealand has had a recent uptick in cases) or until an effective vaccine is widely available. This is not realistic and should not be our objective. C19 is going to continue to circulate in the Canadian population and there is absolutely nothing we can do to stop it. That much should be abundantly clear. Our objective should be to limit the spread so that infections don't again threaten to overwhelm the Canadian health care system. In addition, we need to do a better job of protecting vulnerable Canadians (the elderly for example, and immuno-compromised individuals) than we did in March and April. But we should not be treating the entire population as "vulnerable", which is what we are doing in effect with the current international travel restrictions.
We have friends originally from France who will be traveling there (from Toronto) in a few weeks for vacation. They will not be obliged to self-quarantine when they enter France but under current rules they will have to do so when they return to Canada. Understandably, the French government is asking the Canadian government for a reciprocal arrangement and I'd be surprised if there were not other governments doing the same. The Canadian government should respond appropriately by starting to loosen the blanket quarantine requirement, at least for travelers coming from selected countries. And I believe that the Canadian government should make it easier for Canadian business travelers to return from all international destinations by putting into place a clearer framework. We need to stop the crap shoot.
None of this would be inconsistent with the primary objective of limiting the spread of C19 in Canada.
Swinging open the doors for foreigners begs an increase in cases. Some may want to swap Canadian lives for the international jet set but the majority of people don't. Canadians have worked too hard to contain the virus to simply toss it all away because people from France want to swan off to a continental holiday and are pouting at the prospect of a two week quarantine when they return.
Last edited by Badenoch; Aug 13, 2020 at 5:49 pm
#54
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: YVR, HNL
Programs: AS 75k, UA peon, BA Bronze, AC E50k, Marriott Plat, HH Diamond, Fairmont Plat (RIP)
Posts: 7,830
If you choose not to travel and get along fine without it, I respect that and I bet that WildcatYXU does as well. It's your call. But as long as we're traveling in full conformance with the risk management system the Gov't of Canada has put into place, it's NOT ok for you to call us out for being irresponsible. We aren't....
It does sound like WildcatYXU does fit that bill. He stated he works in critical infrastructure in a business that is part of the supply chain to Canada. That is exactly what the exemption is meant for. Not because you want to keep collecting your paycheck to support yourself.
#55
Join Date: Mar 2016
Programs: AC SE
Posts: 1,503
FYI for those who are returning: They are making it clear they expect that you will quarantine alone. If you return home to your family, and fail to distance from them, your family needs to quarantine as well. Two different agents told me that today as I returned via YYZ. That is true even if you have no symptoms and are not aware of any close contacts with an infected person.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2015
Location: BOS, YVR, ZRH
Programs: *G
Posts: 17,384
I'll ask a question I asked earlier that went unanswered before:
If I turnstile at the border, that does NOT mandate mandatory quarantine, right? Just checking.
(leave Canada to talk to CBP, then return)
If I turnstile at the border, that does NOT mandate mandatory quarantine, right? Just checking.
(leave Canada to talk to CBP, then return)
Last edited by tcook052; Aug 17, 2020 at 8:25 am
#57
Join Date: May 2016
Location: YUL
Programs: Aeroplan, NEXUS
Posts: 432
I read somewhere that Flagpoling is considered Non-Discretionary, so I would assume that this would also require a Quarantine?
#58
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2015
Location: BOS, YVR, ZRH
Programs: *G
Posts: 17,384
That'd be ridiculous since I'd only be in the US for like 30 seconds... and my boss wouldn't like it very much if I told him I had to quarantine for 2 weeks because I needed to go talk to CBP.
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,573
If you choose not to travel and get along fine without it, I respect that and I bet that WildcatYXU does as well. It's your call. But as long as we're traveling in full conformance with the risk management system the Gov't of Canada has put into place, it's NOT ok for you to call us out for being irresponsible. We aren't.
It is downright ludicrous to suggest that someone traveling to France for a holiday and returning to Canada is "tossing it all away". Your perception of the risk is detached from reality.
And this is really the key, right? International travel is not inconsistent with managing the risks associated with C19 risks. Nor is school re-opening. Nor is re-opening restaurants and other businesses. Life goes on. C19 isn't going away: we need to live with it for the foreseeable future. Risk management needs to be based on maintaining the R number at 1.0 or below and NOT on eliminating the virus from circulation because as I said in my previous post, that's a fantasy.
It is downright ludicrous to suggest that someone traveling to France for a holiday and returning to Canada is "tossing it all away". Your perception of the risk is detached from reality.
And this is really the key, right? International travel is not inconsistent with managing the risks associated with C19 risks. Nor is school re-opening. Nor is re-opening restaurants and other businesses. Life goes on. C19 isn't going away: we need to live with it for the foreseeable future. Risk management needs to be based on maintaining the R number at 1.0 or below and NOT on eliminating the virus from circulation because as I said in my previous post, that's a fantasy.