Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

BA Cabin Crew Vote 96% In Favour Of Strike Action

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BA Cabin Crew Vote 96% In Favour Of Strike Action

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 22, 2007, 6:59 am
  #391  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA Blue.
Posts: 986
How does BA cabin staff conditions compare to other airlines - especially Virgin? Are the salaries roughly the same? Pensions? Sick days?

"Originally Posted by Spitfire1
Forgive me if it's been asked, but what happens if after the three strikes have occured there's still no movement on either side?"

I was thinking the same - totally selfish - but I am flying 2 weeks after the last announced strike dates - hotels which cannot be cancelled, trips, etc booked. Tempted to take the iniative and move to another airline now - as there is a fair chance if not resolved - it will be affected as well.
blawson is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 7:08 am
  #392  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Midland, by way of Odessa, by way of El Paso, by way of Abuja, by way of Mexico City, by way of...
Programs: Aadvantage Exec Plat, AmEx Platinum, Hilton Diamond, United Club, Admiral's Club
Posts: 316
Originally Posted by blawson
How does BA cabin staff conditions compare to other airlines - especially Virgin? Are the salaries roughly the same? Pensions? Sick days?

"Originally Posted by Spitfire1
Forgive me if it's been asked, but what happens if after the three strikes have occured there's still no movement on either side?"

I was thinking the same - totally selfish - but I am flying 2 weeks after the last announced strike dates - hotels which cannot be cancelled, trips, etc booked. Tempted to take the iniative and move to another airline now - as there is a fair chance if not resolved - it will be affected as well.
Yeah, I have the same fear. I am booked in redemption First ABV-LHR on Feb 19 and LGW-IAH Feb 20. In theory, I should be fine. If they don't have it resolved, however.... well, then I get to combine my irrational fear of being downgraded with the relative inflexibility of a reward ticket!
westtexas is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 7:31 am
  #393  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11
pay

Originally Posted by blawson
How does BA cabin staff conditions compare to other airlines - especially Virgin? Are the salaries roughly the same? Pensions? Sick days?

"Originally Posted by Spitfire1
Forgive me if it's been asked, but what happens if after the three strikes have occured there's still no movement on either side?"

I was thinking the same - totally selfish - but I am flying 2 weeks after the last announced strike dates - hotels which cannot be cancelled, trips, etc booked. Tempted to take the iniative and move to another airline now - as there is a fair chance if not resolved - it will be affected as well.
BA flying staff on longhaul do get paid a little better then Virgin and other UK operators. However, Virgin cabin crew have a relatively high turn over, whereas BA do not, and so come the associated costs with a lower turnover i.e pension. The American carriers, JAL and Cathey pacific all have comparable if not better pay and conditions, especially if you remain a loyal employee. In Europe, the likes of Air France, Lufthansa and KLM all are very comparable although KLM get more time off after some trips.

If nothing happens after the 3 strikes I am guessing that we will be balloted again for strike action. This I would think will be highly unlikely as I do believe that a solution will be found, in addition to BA loosing a lot of money, this will send warning bells to the city of London and major shareholders who will "tell" BA to sort this out once and for all.

Inevitably, the knock on affect of this will last for weeks. So many of you with forward travel plans will be affected. This is the cold hard truth. The only thing to do is contact BA.com or telephone BA to try and get an update on your particular flight.
globesurfer is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 8:54 am
  #394  
jhm
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 2,809
I did a Google search for "British Airways strike" and came across British Airways strike averted after agreement reached!

Unfortunately, it was a report from 2004. However, I see that the report says:

BA agreed to give its staff an 8.5 percent pay increase over three years plus a lump sum of 1,000 pounds (1,800 US dollars) in three payments before September 2006.

In return, unions representing BA staff accepted a deal designed to cut absenteeism from work from the current annual average of 17 days to 10 days.
I don't know details of this dispute back in 2004 but are these the same BA staff who're now planning to strike ? (If so, I note the timing!)
jhm is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 9:08 am
  #395  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: On the X26 bus to and from LHR
Programs: BA Blue. 19695 Lifetime TPs
Posts: 2,316
Originally Posted by jhm
(If so, I note the timing!)
I think we all will - "we'll take your money, but don't expect us to deliver our side - at least not without asking for more"
fraisse10 is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 9:22 am
  #396  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sevenoaks
Programs: CX Gold, SPG Plat, PC Plat, TAP Gold
Posts: 1,080
I've managed to stay out of this debate so far but recent events (namely the setting of a date for an actual strike plus some of the comments made on both sides) have led me to the opinion that this impasse needs to be broken.

If this was just the cabin crew versus Willie the Slasher I would have no hesitation in supporting the strike. However it is becoming increasingly obvious to me that it is 21st century economic reality versus 1970s dogma - and last time I looked it was 2007 not 1977.

It's embarassing that we live in a time when even a Labour Chancellor harps on about the benefits of flexible working practices and yet our national airline is riddled with outdated attitudes to change that even die-hard socialists gave up years ago.

I feel sorry for the cabin crew caught in the middle of this - they are having their reputation blighted by a handful of scruffy, middle-aged Scargillites whose only motive is political obstinance.

Good luck Willie, I support you! (in return can we have Krug back in F )
oyster is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 9:31 am
  #397  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BoJoVille - Host City of the best ever Olympics!
Programs: Meh!
Posts: 886
Originally Posted by fraisse10
I'm due to fly on 8th, so at this point nominally not affected by the strike, so will have to wait and see - in a way this makes things worse, because the knock-on will almost certainly mess us up but if it doesn't we have plans that I'd rather stick with.
Ditto due to fly on the 9th.

BBC news is reporting that BA has referred the dispute to ACAS which is probably positive - it implies that a negotiated settlement is the likely outcome, but then again it could be an automatic step to appear not to be at fault in the event a resolution is not reached.
Halo is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 10:32 am
  #398  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly AUS or rural England
Programs: BAEC redundant Bronze, AAdvantage Lifetime PLT, CO, WN, B6
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by globesurfer
From that Ł15,000 we must pay our pension, which is about Ł33 a month, which if I retire at 55 will leave me with a pension of approx Ł5000 a year. BA are suggesting that in order that I get a pension of Ł10,000 a year I must put in somewhere between 17% to 23% extra of my basic salary into the pension pot and work to 60.
Sorry, but I'm afraid I cannot see your argument nor feel any sympathy with this part.

The fact is the economy as a whole cannot afford people retiring at 55, and frankly 60 sounds pretty generous to me - there is a HUGE problem looming overall of us - the demographics are just not going to support this. And in case you're about to argue that your employer promised this when you signed up, let me point out a former employer put a chunk of my pension is Equitable Life - I'm destined to die with my boots on.
bernardd is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 10:57 am
  #399  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Programs: BA Blue, IC Spire Ambassador
Posts: 5,227
Originally Posted by bernardd
Sorry, but I'm afraid I cannot see your argument nor feel any sympathy with this part.

The fact is the economy as a whole cannot afford people retiring at 55, and frankly 60 sounds pretty generous to me - there is a HUGE problem looming overall of us - the demographics are just not going to support this. And in case you're about to argue that your employer promised this when you signed up, let me point out a former employer put a chunk of my pension is Equitable Life - I'm destined to die with my boots on.
Exactly!

On another note, look at the state pension -the age increases constantly -ok so we're not PROMISED anything, but I bet there was something in the BA ts and cs that said it could change! Working 'til your sixty seems fair to me -Ł5000 a year extra, it's better than nothing.
IAMORGAN is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 11:20 am
  #400  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Programs: Bonvoy Gold, AA Plat, Volare Premier, VS Silver, National Emerald Elite, Hertz President Circle
Posts: 2,526
Originally Posted by PhilH
Nonsense bealine!!! The comparison is not between average and median. The comparison is between BA cabin crew and other workers in the UK.
For all reasons discussed before, I believe that if a comparison needs being made it'll have to be with CCs of other airlines, especially UK based.
wobbly wings is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 11:26 am
  #401  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sometimes Houston, Sometimes London.
Programs: CO Gold Elite, BA Blue, for the moment - Hyatt Gold Passport, Priority Club, Marriott etc etc
Posts: 2,126
Originally Posted by bernardd
Sorry, but I'm afraid I cannot see your argument nor feel any sympathy with this part.

The fact is the economy as a whole cannot afford people retiring at 55, and frankly 60 sounds pretty generous to me - there is a HUGE problem looming overall of us - the demographics are just not going to support this. And in case you're about to argue that your employer promised this when you signed up, let me point out a former employer put a chunk of my pension is Equitable Life - I'm destined to die with my boots on.
Retire at 55? The minimum retirement age in the US to get full benefits is now 67. Anyway, what would you do for twenty years + until you shuffled off this mortal coil? How boring retirement looks to me.

bernardd is right... I'm 37 and fear for the next twenty years, as my salary and the salaries of the poor sods entering the workforce now will have to support the millions of baby boomers who have been promised so much through social security. Who's going to pay for it all?
ElkeNorEast is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 11:37 am
  #402  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mostly AUS or rural England
Programs: BAEC redundant Bronze, AAdvantage Lifetime PLT, CO, WN, B6
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by ElkeNorEast
Retire at 55? The minimum retirement age in the US to get full benefits is now 67.
It's going the same way in the UK for everyone except Public employees, and that so far as I can see because the present Government doesn't have the cojones to take on the Public Sector unions and point out the facts of life - they seem to want to leave the problem for the next, presumably more right wing, leaders to cop the flak.

I have to say though, as a resident of TX, I don't think Dubya's doing much of a job getting the message about the scale of the problem across.
bernardd is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 11:37 am
  #403  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Programs: BA EC Gold
Posts: 9,236
Originally Posted by ElkeNorEast
Retire at 55?
Welcome to Europe, m'dear!

You think that Britain has problems with early pensioners drawing full benefits for life, you should see France and Germany (not to mention Belgium, the Netherlands, and Scandinavia). What a mess.

Originally Posted by ElkeNorEast
Anyway, what would you do for twenty years + until you shuffled off this mortal coil? How boring retirement looks to me.
You'd be amazed at the number of beaches left to be visited...

Originally Posted by ElkeNorEast
bernardd is right... I'm 37 and fear for the next twenty years, as my salary and the salaries of the poor sods entering the workforce now will have to support the millions of baby boomers who have been promised so much through social security. Who's going to pay for it all?
The most useful piece of advice I've ever received is thus: start saving for your retirement now, because no-one else is going to pay for it by the time you get round to retiring.
ajax is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 12:39 pm
  #404  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Programs: Bonvoy Gold, AA Plat, Volare Premier, VS Silver, National Emerald Elite, Hertz President Circle
Posts: 2,526
Given this is all OT can it be taken to omni and can the mods take action?
wobbly wings is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2007, 12:46 pm
  #405  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA, VS, HH, IHG, MB, MR
Posts: 26,871
In the 12 years that I have been in employment, I have never taken a day off sick.

However, if I was an 'average' BA cabin crew member (pre last years agreement) I would have taken 266 days sick-leave by now .....

Sounds a bit odd to me!
Raffles is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.