789 F Bassinet - a disgrace

Old Oct 2, 23, 6:47 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Programs: MUCCI, British Airways Executive Club Gold
Posts: 1,770
789 F Bassinet - a disgrace

I got off an ultra long haul sector to HND yesterday and took my 10 month old with me for the first time in F.

The bassinet is simply a joke in this cabin and aircraft. For those of you who don’t know, seat 2F can have a bassinet attached but it blocks the table, wardrobe and foot stall from use. You also cannot recline the F seat to a bed or even really recline. Crew said this is a ‘design flaw’ and Club provides a better experience on this aircraft.

Why offer a bassinet in name only? Has anybody else experienced this?
tom139 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 7:16 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Programs: BA Gold, Mucci
Posts: 1,972
Originally Posted by tom139
I got off an ultra long haul sector to HND yesterday and took my 10 month old with me for the first time in F.

The bassinet is simply a joke in this cabin and aircraft. For those of you who don’t know, seat 2F can have a bassinet attached but it blocks the table, wardrobe and foot stall from use. You also cannot recline the F seat to a bed or even really recline. Crew said this is a ‘design flaw’ and Club provides a better experience on this aircraft.

Why offer a bassinet in name only? Has anybody else experienced this?
I'm sure British Airways believe the usual First Class passenger has children aged at least 30 or above. People in your demographic are supposed to be struggling to make ends meet, not flying First Class.

Therefore you have been appropriately penalised for having the audacity to bring a baby into the hallowed confines of the First Class cabin.

Seems it's Club World for you until your baby is over two

(Levity aside, I would have been just as irritated if I was restricted from using pretty much all the elements of the seat due to the bassinet!)
FlightDetective is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 7:29 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,435
Originally Posted by FlightDetective
I'm sure British Airways believe the usual First Class passenger has children aged at least 30 or above. People in your demographic are supposed to be struggling to make ends meet, not flying First Class.

Therefore you have been appropriately penalised for having the audacity to bring a baby into the hallowed confines of the First Class cabin.

Seems it's Club World for you until your baby is over two

(Levity aside, I would have been just as irritated if I was restricted from using pretty much all the elements of the seat due to the bassinet!)
Surely BA assumes that a First passenger travelling with an infant will have hired someone to travel with said infant, and suffer the limited functions of the seat on their behalf.
Flythe96flag is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 7:38 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Programs: Honors Diamond
Posts: 1,476
Having had the misfortune of changing a nappy in the rear washroom of the 320neo yesterday, I’ve come to the view that aerospace engineers have clearly never actually travelled with a young child.
lcylocal is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 7:46 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 75
Originally Posted by Flythe96flag
Surely BA assumes that a First passenger travelling with an infant will have hired someone to travel with said infant, and suffer the limited functions of the seat on their behalf.
Anyone travelling First will obviously have purchased an Economy seat for their infant - they have to learn these things are earnt, otherwise they grow up so entitled.
Penfold101 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 7:53 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,435
Originally Posted by Penfold101
Anyone travelling First will obviously have purchased an Economy seat for their infant - they have to learn these things are earnt, otherwise they grow up so entitled.
I was under the impression such passengers might be more inclined to see entitlement as a virtue.
757FO and Penfold101 like this.
Flythe96flag is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 8:26 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Programs: Does Non Rev count?
Posts: 559
Originally Posted by tom139
I got off an ultra long haul sector to HND yesterday and took my 10 month old with me for the first time in F.

The bassinet is simply a joke in this cabin and aircraft. For those of you who don’t know, seat 2F can have a bassinet attached but it blocks the table, wardrobe and foot stall from use. You also cannot recline the F seat to a bed or even really recline. Crew said this is a ‘design flaw’ and Club provides a better experience on this aircraft.

Why offer a bassinet in name only? Has anybody else experienced this?
Earn more money and fly private, problem solved.
FlightDetective likes this.
757FO is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 8:49 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scotland, UK
Programs: BA Silver, Delta Skymiles, Hilton Honors, IHG One Rewards, Melia Rewards
Posts: 409
Don’t get me started with babies in premium cabins!

gaz
roberto99, NoY, VSLover and 11 others like this.
gaz68 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 9:45 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,962
I'd ask for it to be removed and sleep with the baby - for many carriers 10 mo's is over the limit unless s/he is very small. Ideally there's a partner who can help.
GUWonder and bisonrav like this.
erik123 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 10:32 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,393
Originally Posted by FlightDetective
Seems it's Club World for you until your baby is over two
And then Economy until they can stay seated and belted in a CW suite without supervision
FlightDetective likes this.
adrianlondon is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 11:15 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 1,132
Originally Posted by gaz68
Don’t get me started with babies in premium cabins!
Big difference between a baby in J and the tiny F cabin. F for me is meant to be to get away from it all. Most people in F are there simply to sleep as much as possible!
chriswiles is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 11:28 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,355
Originally Posted by chriswiles
Big difference between a baby in J and the tiny F cabin. F for me is meant to be to get away from it all. Most people in F are there simply to sleep as much as possible!
I like Emirates approach to F .... charging adult fares for all regardless of age. While not banning families, the price tag associated is a deterrent for most.
1Aturnleft is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 12:31 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,734
Originally Posted by gaz68
Don’t get me started with babies in premium cabins! on public transport

gaz
Fixed it for you there.
Horatio, JD1905 and Delboy65 like this.
Kgmm77 is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 1:16 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Programs: BAEC GGL
Posts: 833
A little OT but I remember the "bassinet" flying Virgin Upper Class to the West Coast around 2,000. It was (quite literally) a Virgin branded cardboard box.
abligh is offline  
Old Oct 2, 23, 1:25 pm
  #15  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: ±38,000 feet
Programs: LH HON, BA GGL, AF Plat, EK Plat
Posts: 6,275
Good to know. We have 42 flights planned for 2024 with baby, most on QR J and SQ F, which will both hopefully provide better bassinet experience, but I shall be sure to write a review of each different plane and carrier
nufnuf77 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.