Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

G-EUUC : A320 Airframe on second divert to LHR in 3 days

G-EUUC : A320 Airframe on second divert to LHR in 3 days

Old Sep 25, 23, 2:11 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold | Hilton Honors Platinum
Posts: 203
G-EUUC : A320 Airframe on second divert to LHR in 3 days

As the title suggests: following a divert to LHR on Friday 22nd after aborting BA508 to Faro, the same airframe is currently at 10,000 ft over Northern France having seemingly aborted the scheduled BA336 service this morning to Marseille and is returning to LHR.

Not a good look for BA Engineering! Time to let that bird rest a little it would seem....
becks1 and zen100 like this.
DrBenO is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:19 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 817
Most tracked flight on FlightRadar24, by some margin. Going over the english channel now - still squarking 7700
SxMan likes this.
zen100 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:22 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold | Hilton Honors Platinum
Posts: 203
If as is being speculated the issue is the same as on Friday (pressurisation problems) then surely serious safety questions need to be asked as to why the aircraft operated today?
SxMan likes this.
DrBenO is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:27 am
  #4  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
Hilton 5+ BadgeHyatt 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Mucci des Salons Ouvrants
Posts: 2,763
Originally Posted by DrBenO
If as is being speculated the issue is the same as on Friday (pressurisation problems) then surely serious safety questions need to be asked as to why the aircraft operated today?
Those questions most certainly shouldnt be asked or answered by an internet board of people who know very little.

BA safety has never been in question, and despite some of the front of house issues they experience, that will not change.

Regards aks120
BearX220, Fritz, Lynyrd and 16 others like this.
aks120 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:45 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lincoln, UK
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 1,219
Originally Posted by aks120
Those questions most certainly shouldnt be asked or answered by an internet board of people who know very little.

BA safety has never been in question, and despite some of the front of house issues they experience, that will not change.
Well FT is a tough crowd and we are blessed with some very knowledgeable contributors on here. As for safety never being in question, the evidence of this aircraft raises several questions. They may all have innocent answers and these events may be unrelated. But "never" is a definitive that is a brave statement.
bafan, YacozA, DrBenO and 6 others like this.
HarryHolden68 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:49 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold | Hilton Honors Platinum
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by aks120
Those questions most certainly shouldnt be asked or answered by an internet board of people who know very little.

BA safety has never been in question, and despite some of the front of house issues they experience, that will not change.

Regards aks120
Indeed- but as a member of an equally / similarly tightly regulated industry in terms of safety, my RCA and CAPA spidey senses are tingling!

All critical safety systems are solid, until they suddenly arent
bafan likes this.
DrBenO is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:50 am
  #7  
BOH
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,575
Originally Posted by aks120
Those questions most certainly shouldnt be asked or answered by an internet board of people who know very little.

BA safety has never been in question, and despite some of the front of house issues they experience, that will not change.

Regards aks120
FT is an IBB FFS. And home of the acronym too

Bit of a silly statement you made there, it's EXACTLY the purpose of a social media IBB. And there are quite a few of us on here with civil aviation engineering backgrounds.
BOH is online now  
Old Sep 25, 23, 2:59 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,633
Originally Posted by BOH
FT is an IBB FFS. And home of the acronym too

Bit of a silly statement you made there, it's EXACTLY the purpose of a social media IBB. And there are quite a few of us on here with civil aviation engineering backgrounds.
What use is that without access to the evidence of what has gone on. At best youd speculate, no?
argonath and DiamondMile like this.
dougzz is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:09 am
  #9  
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 18,615
All that I will say is that FRadar24 shows a decent from 33,000 to 10;000 put in less than 10 minutes. I will speculate no further except to inquire how accurate this App is in such matters

I am grateful that the aircraft is down safely and hope that no one was hurt aboard.
PUCCI GALORE is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:19 am
  #10  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Marriott Bonvoy
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Englandshire
Programs: SPG LT Plat, BA G, BD*LG, MG Blue+ ...
Posts: 15,670
Originally Posted by aks120
BA safety has never been in question
As with all the previous "we don't actually know what happened" threads, it's probably best to avoid replying to "questions most certainly shouldnt be asked or answered by an internet board of people who know very little" with "sweeping statements that shouldn't really be made on an internet board".
Oxon Flyer is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:19 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: AMS
Programs: BAEC Silver, Flying Blue Gold, TK M&S Nobody
Posts: 2,207
Originally Posted by PUCCI GALORE
All that I will say is that FRadar24 shows a decent from 33,000 to 10;000 put in less than 10 minutes. I will speculate no further except to inquire how accurate this App is in such matters

I am grateful that the aircraft is down safely and hope that no one was hurt aboard.
FlightRadar24 uses the information transmitted by the aircraft itself, collated by a network of receivers. At least some of the receivers are supplied by FR24 to people volunteering to host them, Im not sure if there are also public receivers in their network.
etiene is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:21 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,613
Well BA 336 will go again but on G-EUUH, as did the FAO on Friday, again on a different frame.
UUC has been dispatching in accordance with the DDG, albeit a repeat fault of the same nature on the opposite (functioning) side will indeed lead to a descent down to 10,000.

Oh well, another frame to add to the AOG list.
Sigwx is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:21 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,074
Originally Posted by aks120
Those questions most certainly shouldn’t be asked or answered by an internet board of people who know very little.

BA safety has never been in question, and despite some of the ‘front of house’ issues they experience, that will not change.

Regards aks120
if FR had an aircraft that returned to base twice in 3 days because of suspected pressurisation events then many on this board would point out how cheap they were and that this demonstrated exactly why they were justified never to fly with them
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:24 am
  #14  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors, Virgin
Posts: 761
Originally Posted by PUCCI GALORE
All that I will say is that FRadar24 shows a decent from 33,000 to 10;000 put in less than 10 minutes. I will speculate no further except to inquire how accurate this App is in such matters

I am grateful that the aircraft is down safely and hope that no one was hurt aboard.
FR24 is pretty accurate as it is getting its' information from ADSB, so effectively directly from the aircraft.

A conversation I had with a BA captian a couple of weeks ago suggested that BA have recently lost alot of experienced engineers to United, who have, apparently opened a new maintenance facility at or close to Heathrow and are paying considerably more than BA. That may just be conjecture on his part however.
becks1 likes this.
steve170461 is offline  
Old Sep 25, 23, 3:27 am
  #15  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
Hilton 5+ BadgeHyatt 5+ Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA GGL, IHG Diamond Ambassador, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Mucci des Salons Ouvrants
Posts: 2,763
Fine - have at it - speculate to your hearts content! Get yourselves all worked up over it and vow never to fly BA again! I really don’t care. My point was speculation about a lack of a CE meal reaches proportions that border on ridiculous - god knows where you will go with this!

If a bunch of gifted amateurs feel they can diagnose the issue with it then I take my comment back. As someone who is in the aviation industry, and I have been for 30 years, I can be pretty confident in my view that the knowledgable experts we are lucky to have on here will not comment in depth on the speculation about safety.

Since you all feel very differently I will leave the wolves to it.

Regards

aks120
aks120 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.