Community
Wiki Posts
Search

“Double yellow” on body scanner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:19 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,105
“Double yellow” on body scanner

Passing through the First wing this morning the full body scanner failed twice to detect my form at all triggering what they called “a double yellow”.This involved a manager being called and me being taken into a private room for a full body search by hand.

According to the initial security agent this was a fault in the machine, but the manager insisted that this was a random selection for full search. If this was true then they weren’t very well set up for it as the manager had to be called to perform the search and there was no log book in the private room for recording it (he was calling someone else to bring a new one).

Apart from the delay it caused and the inconsistent explanation of why I had been selected for this, two things surprised me.

First, they wanted me just to leave my luggage on the conveyor belt. I pointed out that this would
just cause a massive backlog for everyone else (I had 3 trays) so they moved it to the public repacking area. I refused to leave it unattended while I was searched - which they seemed to think was perfectly fine - but eventually a spare security agent said she would keep an eye on it.

On the rare occasions I have been stopped for
enhanced security elsewhere the first thing they have done is ask me to identify my hand luggage - which makes a lot of sense to me. Here they seemed to think I was being unreasonable not wanting to leave all my belongings, including documents, unsupervised: “there are cameras everywhere here” said the manager!

Secondly the search itself was remarkably standard issue. Just a lot more patting down but he didn’t even ask me to remove my shoes. It seemed no more personal than what they were doing in the public area to anyone who triggers the machine with an alert. I asked how this was in
any way different from standard security and they were both at a loss lol.
RockyRobin and SxMan like this.
aristoph is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:23 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: BA (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 1,256
Same thing happened to me in the First Wing yesterday and they used the same double yellow terminology. They called a manager but it was apparent that person wouldn’t turn up anytime soon so they patted and swabbed everything they could think of and let me go.
becks1 likes this.
CCayley is online now  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:29 am
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,105
Originally Posted by CCayley
Same thing happened to me in the First Wing yesterday and they used the same double yellow terminology. They called a manager but it was apparent that person wouldn’t turn up anytime soon so they patted and swabbed everything they could think of and let me go.
interesting. So I suspect the first guy was right, there is an issue with the machine. He seemed pretty p&&&ed off when he called saying “yeah, we’ve got another double yellow” - it certainly didn’t sound like standard procedure.
aristoph is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:30 am
  #4  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,769
The bit about leaving your bags unattended is definitely incorrect, you are responsible for your bags in LHR, see Heathrow 2014 Bylaws 3.9. And an agent suggesting you breach the bylaws is in turn in breach of their conditions of employment.

Double yellow is required to be fully investigated though, the requirement is that HAL security is certain that you are safe for passage, and it is ultimately in everyone's best interest. Doesn't excuse incompetent handling though.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:38 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: United GS, BAEC GGL, IHG Diamond, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 461
Happened to me a couple of months ago.

Same thing - machine can't detect you twice, need a private search in a room/booth at the end of the security belt on the right hand side - however they let me take all my stuff in with me for it.

Ended up being about 10 mins all in as they had to call a manager to come as part of it. Was no big deal and they were perfectly pleasant through it all.
Jpm81 is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:42 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,105
Originally Posted by Jpm81
Happened to me a couple of months ago.

Same thing - machine can't detect you twice, need a private search in a room/booth at the end of the security belt on the right hand side - however they let me take all my stuff in with me for it.

Ended up being about 10 mins all in as they had to call a manager to come as part of it. Was no big deal and they were perfectly pleasant through it all.
I was told not to go near my luggage and they would have left it except I refused to go
to the room until I knew it was safe guarded.
aristoph is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:45 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 726
Examples like this - involving not one employee but at least two, including a manager! - make me think Heathrow isn't really there to facilitate air travel, but an expensive government jobs scheme to employ people who would otherwise be completely incapable of securing and maintaining a job elsewhere.
wrp96, RNdouble, Ramos and 4 others like this.
SW7London is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:51 am
  #8  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,769
Except HAL is a private company and the staff concerned have no employment link to the government.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 5:53 am
  #9  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,769
Originally Posted by aristoph
interesting. So I suspect the first guy was right, there is an issue with the machine. He seemed pretty p&&&ed off when he called saying “yeah, we’ve got another double yellow” - it certainly didn’t sound like standard procedure.
Did you notice whether the lights were a bit dim? Loading shedding can cause the scanners to misfunction if it goes out of tolerance on watts or cycles, and load shedding increases the risk of this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 6:02 am
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,105
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Did you notice whether the lights were a bit dim? Loading shedding can cause the scanners to misfunction if it goes out of tolerance on watts or cycles, and load shedding increases the risk of this.
I didn’t but my goodness have we reached South African levels of infrastructure in the UK
now? Lol People before and after me came through just fine though.
TFM likes this.
aristoph is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 6:03 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, ARN, HEL, ..... or MAN
Programs: BA GGL / GFL, Mucci Diamond!, HH Diamond, Radisson Premium, IHG Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 5,893
Yep I had this about 6 months ago. By the time I’d been though the machine twice, my baggage was through the scanner and they had no issue with me re-packing it all and taking it into the room with me. An unusual situation for me but not unpleasant in any way.
ThatT1Feeling is online now  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 6:08 am
  #12  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,105
Originally Posted by ThatT1Feeling
Yep I had this about 6 months ago. By the time I’d been though the machine twice, my baggage was through the scanner and they had no issue with me re-packing it all and taking it into the room with me. An unusual situation for me but not unpleasant in any way.
I agree apart from a) I was kept away from my luggage and had to kick up a fuss to have it looked after and b) I really didn’t see how the private search was any different from the pat down outside. If anything it was less stringent as I wasn’t asked to remove my shoes.
aristoph is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 7:22 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Milton Keynes, UK
Programs: BA Gold (OW Emerald), TK Elite (*A Gold)
Posts: 574
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
…you are responsible for your bags in LHR, see Heathrow 2014 Bylaws 3.9.
The fact you knew this is remarkable, but I’ve just had a read of the document. It’s a very general clause, but everyone seems to leave bags unattended in the lounge. If someone really wanted, what would be the consequences of breaching this bylaw?
stevebintley is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 7:31 am
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,105
Originally Posted by stevebintley
The fact you knew this is remarkable, but I’ve just had a read of the document. It’s a very general clause, but everyone seems to leave bags unattended in the lounge. If someone really wanted, what would be the consequences of breaching this bylaw?
You could get a job in the First Pier security team?
nancypants likes this.
aristoph is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2023, 8:21 am
  #15  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Hertfordshire
Programs: BA Gold, Accor Diamond, IHG Diamond
Posts: 553
Scanners on Friday were rejecting most people and making them go through the secondary hands up machine. Haven’t even bothered with FW security twice in the last week as the queue was beyond the boarding pass scanners and Fast Track South was much shorter.

LHR security is getting like MAN. Woefully inefficient, hostile attitude, work to rule approach, increased secondary scans and their make it up as they go along attitude.
Ramos and SxMan like this.
cameramaker is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.