BA charges to pre-assign World Traveller Plus seats?
#46
Join Date: Mar 2022
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 147
Not really. I just tend to look into things like booking and seat selection policies before procuring services, rather than doing as such and complaining it's not what I wanted afterwards.
#47
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 5,364
The sticker shock is intentional. The fees are intended to be a disincentive to select a seat before check-in opens.
If BA charged a nominal £20 per seat in J for pax without status, there would no doubt be some grumbling about “nickel and diming” yet most people forking out J prices would pay it. The £100+ charges per seat are to dissuade people selecting seats too far in advance, protecting the benefit of free seat selection to those with status. However, for those determined to select seats sooner, BA will happily take your money.
If BA charged a nominal £20 per seat in J for pax without status, there would no doubt be some grumbling about “nickel and diming” yet most people forking out J prices would pay it. The £100+ charges per seat are to dissuade people selecting seats too far in advance, protecting the benefit of free seat selection to those with status. However, for those determined to select seats sooner, BA will happily take your money.
In the end, BA takes in extra marginal revenue and at the same time rewards those with elite status, and I certainly can't disagree with this in practice or principle.
#48
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 43,249
The sticker shock is intentional. The fees are intended to be a disincentive to select a seat before check-in opens.
If BA charged a nominal £20 per seat in J for pax without status, there would no doubt be some grumbling about “nickel and diming” yet most people forking out J prices would pay it. The £100+ charges per seat are to dissuade people selecting seats too far in advance, protecting the benefit of free seat selection to those with status. However, for those determined to select seats sooner, BA will happily take your money.
If BA charged a nominal £20 per seat in J for pax without status, there would no doubt be some grumbling about “nickel and diming” yet most people forking out J prices would pay it. The £100+ charges per seat are to dissuade people selecting seats too far in advance, protecting the benefit of free seat selection to those with status. However, for those determined to select seats sooner, BA will happily take your money.
#49
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dundee
Programs: BA Plastic. Speedwell Bar Lifetime Platinum.
Posts: 1,303
#50
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Glasgow, UK
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 227
orit might simply be that BA makes more money with selling fewer seat selections but at a higher cost. I doubt that the aim is to reduce income. If there are, say, 50 seat savailable forr sale, selling all at GBP20 brings in GBP1000 whilst selling 15 at GBP100 brings in GBP1500.
#51
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 43,249
I doubt that BA actually has a desire to keep seats unsold for the benefit of those with status - I think it much more likely that it has looked at what gives the best return on average. That this leads to benefits for those paying full fare or holding status is, I reckon, a coincidence rather than an intent
I haven't seen anything else to suggest that BA has a particular desire to provide special benefits , beyond those published, for those holding status
I haven't seen anything else to suggest that BA has a particular desire to provide special benefits , beyond those published, for those holding status
#52
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: AMS
Programs: BAEC Gold, Flying Blue Silver, TK M&S Nobody
Posts: 1,802
I doubt that BA actually has a desire to keep seats unsold for the benefit of those with status - I think it much more likely that it has looked at what gives the best return on average. That this leads to benefits for those paying full fare or holding status is, I reckon, a coincidence rather than an intent
I haven't seen anything else to suggest that BA has a particular desire to provide special benefits , beyond those published, for those holding status
I haven't seen anything else to suggest that BA has a particular desire to provide special benefits , beyond those published, for those holding status
#53
Join Date: Jun 2011
Programs: BAEC Gold, HHonors Gold, Marriot Bonvoy Gold, MeliaRewards Gold, Radisson Gold
Posts: 795
As others have mentioned, if their desired outcome really was to simple "dissuade" advance seat selection, then they do in fact have the ultimate power to do that... by simply not allowing it at all for anyone without status. Or by allowing it to happen at a lower price, but limiting things to only a set number/% of seats being pre-purchased. They have ways to manage seating inventory beyond just stemming the flow by trying to price people out of purchasing, if that truly were their only objective.
#54
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,195
Honestly, you can stop waving these anecdotes around as if they will magically stop any debate on this topic. Scepticism is still perfectly valid, even if this was how BA publicly - or privately - positioned (spun?) their intentions around the high pricing of seat selection.
As others have mentioned, if their desired outcome really was to simple "dissuade" advance seat selection, then they do in fact have the ultimate power to do that... by simply not allowing it at all for anyone without status. Or by allowing it to happen at a lower price, but limiting things to only a set number/% of seats being pre-purchased. They have ways to manage seating inventory beyond just stemming the flow by trying to price people out of purchasing, if that truly were their only objective.
As others have mentioned, if their desired outcome really was to simple "dissuade" advance seat selection, then they do in fact have the ultimate power to do that... by simply not allowing it at all for anyone without status. Or by allowing it to happen at a lower price, but limiting things to only a set number/% of seats being pre-purchased. They have ways to manage seating inventory beyond just stemming the flow by trying to price people out of purchasing, if that truly were their only objective.
Not all unoccupied seats are available for purchase.
It’s certainly a case of dammed if they do, damned if they don’t.
Last edited by Tobias-UK; Mar 24, 23 at 5:41 pm
#55
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 885
Before the current policy was introduced it was impossible for those without status to select a seat prior to checkin unless travelling on a flexible ticket. That policy was changed because of the number of complaints from passengers who were unable to preselect their seat. The current policy was introduced to provide the option for those without status to pre-select a seat before checkin opened. The pricing was set deliberately to discourage passengers from doing for the reasons set out above.
Not all unoccupied seats are available for purchase.
It’s certainly a case of dammed if they do, damned if they don’t.
Not all unoccupied seats are available for purchase.
It’s certainly a case of dammed if they do, damned if they don’t.
The importance of advance seat selection varies by the aircraft layout and the duration of the flight. In many cases it makes next to no difference (think a 1 hour flight in CE or ET) and in others (think old style dormitory CW on an 11 hour flight) it makes all the difference in the world. But even having advance seat selection (think bronze or silver) doesn't necessarily open up to you the best seats on the plane. I remember being Blue or Bronze and trying to get a window seat on the upper deck of a 747 in CW. It didn't matter if you paid, you probably couldn't get that seat, at least not until you waited until 24 hours before the flight to see if any of them were left.
Now that I have GC status it's definitely easier, but I do see the reason why BA does this, for better or worse.
#56
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: New York, NY
Programs: AA ExPl, DL PM, UA Silver, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium, probably some others
Posts: 3,100
I’m sure you’re right, and shouldn’t have used the term “full-fare”. But, honestly, all I care about is a ticket reading “business class”.
(Rant=on)
And when it does read “business" we’re talking prices of USD 4000 and upwards for a hop across the salty divide, which may not be full-fare but should be more than enough to include seat selection. And it is with every other airline bar BA that I’ve ever been onboard. Penny-pinching by braking it down in fare classes is a rip-off, and so far off industry standard it’s deplorable.
(Rant=off).
There, feel better now
(Rant=on)
And when it does read “business" we’re talking prices of USD 4000 and upwards for a hop across the salty divide, which may not be full-fare but should be more than enough to include seat selection. And it is with every other airline bar BA that I’ve ever been onboard. Penny-pinching by braking it down in fare classes is a rip-off, and so far off industry standard it’s deplorable.
(Rant=off).
There, feel better now
