Should there be a limit to where BA use NEO?
Jan 8, 23, 6:29 am
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GfL+CCR, Aclub Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 29,843
Should there be a limit to where BA use NEO?
Anyone sitting in the back part of NEO planes will probably know what I mean when I say they are really uncomfortable.
I know that AF will not normally fly their equivalent planes beyond a certain distance (initially they were intended for domestic only but this has now been extended to flights of up to 2hr30 I think.) not sure if lh has any such restriction. Ive seen the neo flights regularly used to LCA and even saw them used to CAI. I realise its a commercial decision but spare a thought for people often spending 6 hours ((once you count boarding and de boarding) in those nasty seats
I know that AF will not normally fly their equivalent planes beyond a certain distance (initially they were intended for domestic only but this has now been extended to flights of up to 2hr30 I think.) not sure if lh has any such restriction. Ive seen the neo flights regularly used to LCA and even saw them used to CAI. I realise its a commercial decision but spare a thought for people often spending 6 hours ((once you count boarding and de boarding) in those nasty seats
Jan 8, 23, 6:58 am
#2
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: UK
Programs: BA Executive Club - Gold
Posts: 249
Unfortunately, the correlation between the 'lightweight and therefore fuel efficient' seats fitted to the most fuel efficient planes and long routes make commercial sense, regardless of passenger experience, especially on routes where the competition (EZY / FR) have those seats throughout the whole cabin so I'd expect to see the NEOs deployed on the longer routes as a matter of priority.
At least with BA you have the chance to 'escape' into what we would consider 'normal' seats via CE / status / outright paying for seats.
The race to the bottom continues....
CB
At least with BA you have the chance to 'escape' into what we would consider 'normal' seats via CE / status / outright paying for seats.
The race to the bottom continues....
CB
Jan 8, 23, 7:12 am
#3
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL/GFl, HH Diamond, BW Diamond, Virgin Voyages Deep Blue Extra, Blue Peter Badge Holder
Posts: 3,908
Most people sitting down the back are price driven on short haul, so the cheaper that BA can make those seats being fuel efficient, the cheaper they can commercially sell those seats for.
if you don't want to be sat in those seats, if you have status you can select seats further forward, or if not pay for one. Alternatively pay for J.
if you don't want to be sat in those seats, if you have status you can select seats further forward, or if not pay for one. Alternatively pay for J.
Jan 8, 23, 8:01 am
#4
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: A3*G,BA Silver
Posts: 1,959
Most people sitting down the back are price driven on short haul, so the cheaper that BA can make those seats being fuel efficient, the cheaper they can commercially sell those seats for.
if you don't want to be sat in those seats, if you have status you can select seats further forward, or if not pay for one. Alternatively pay for J.
if you don't want to be sat in those seats, if you have status you can select seats further forward, or if not pay for one. Alternatively pay for J.
The neo seats are terrible with most airlines and you cannot really do more than 2,3 hours max at the back unless you are under 1,70cm.
Last edited by Prospero; Jan 8, 23 at 12:42 pm Reason: Remove inflammatory remark
Jan 8, 23, 8:20 am
#5
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 41,799
I am not sure how terrible they are - I personally havent sat on them but have heard varying opinions from those that have - but unfortunately ba does have to compete.
Jan 8, 23, 8:21 am
#6
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,369
Not sure how accurate this is. Have you flown recently on a neo beyond the emergency exits? The seats are terrible and we are talking for about half of the plane seats?
The neo seats are terrible with most airlines and you cannot really do more than 2,3 hours max at the back unless you are under 1,70cm.
The neo seats are terrible with most airlines and you cannot really do more than 2,3 hours max at the back unless you are under 1,70cm.
To guarantee seats in the front half of the plane (without knowing where the divider will be placed), where seats are more comfortable, seats recline and the legroom a tad more generous you need to consider Club. Alternatively you need to fly another airline where they take customer comfort in Economy more seriously than BA take it.
Last edited by Prospero; Jan 8, 23 at 12:43 pm Reason: Amend quotation
Jan 8, 23, 8:40 am
#7
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: UK. West Sussex
Programs: BAEC. Gold
Posts: 781
By emergency exit seats, do you mean those around row 10/11 or those at row 23/24?
Jan 8, 23, 8:49 am
#8
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 108
Sorry for being thick, but are there two types of seats on the NEOs? Some which are less comfortable than others with the less comfortable ones being down the back and more comfortable nearer the front? And we dont know where the dividing line is between the two?
Jan 8, 23, 8:53 am
#9
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, BA Amex Prem, BA Amex Business, Amex Platinum, Coutts Silk, Hilton Diamond etc.
Posts: 3,789
I believe this means that the maximum size of the CE cabin is 14 rows.
On the A320 Neo the non-reclining seats start from row 13.
I too have never travelled in these seats- am I correct in thinking that they don't have adjustable headrests?
Are there other aspects that make them particularly uncomfortable?
Are they worse than the FR seats?
Jan 8, 23, 9:02 am
#11
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 62,187
Yes, the cover fabric is - which is very thin in both cases - is the only difference with easyJet's new seating, and few people would notice that, as kind of evidenced by the cagey responses upthread. There are also threads saying Pinnacle is more uncomfortable than easyJet.
Jan 8, 23, 9:10 am
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, SQ Gold, IHG Diamond Ambassador, Hilton Gold
Posts: 16,168
I had this displeasure of 34A on an A321neo yesterday - very last minute booking (thankfully only to GVA), and it was the only window or aisle available. They are without a doubt the most uncomfortable seats I've sat on on an aircraft.
Compare to 11A on an A320neo. This is admittedly an exit row so don't get too distracted by the seat pitch - the padding on all aspects of the seat is the key comparison point here, as well as the eye-level iPad / literature holder and adjustable headrest.
Compare to 11A on an A320neo. This is admittedly an exit row so don't get too distracted by the seat pitch - the padding on all aspects of the seat is the key comparison point here, as well as the eye-level iPad / literature holder and adjustable headrest.
Jan 8, 23, 9:15 am
#13
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: In the air
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy LT Plat, Hilton Diamond, GHA Tit, BA Gold, Turkish Elite
Posts: 8,359
Presumably this discrepancy will be solved when BA move all their seating to the A321 standard in the medium term. It makes me think of the old 2x2 CE seats from earlier on in my career - I cant even fully picture them any more.
Jan 8, 23, 9:46 am
#14
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: A3*G,BA Silver
Posts: 1,959
arent they the same as the new Easyjet seats which are throughout the aircraft? How do passengers on Easyjet cope?
I am not sure how terrible they are - I personally havent sat on them but have heard varying opinions from those that have - but unfortunately ba does have to compete.
I am not sure how terrible they are - I personally havent sat on them but have heard varying opinions from those that have - but unfortunately ba does have to compete.
Jan 8, 23, 9:54 am
#15
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 6,938
Anyone sitting in the back part of NEO planes will probably know what I mean when I say they are really uncomfortable.
I know that AF will not normally fly their equivalent planes beyond a certain distance (initially they were intended for domestic only but this has now been extended to flights of up to 2hr30 I think.) not sure if lh has any such restriction. Ive seen the neo flights regularly used to LCA and even saw them used to CAI. I realise its a commercial decision but spare a thought for people often spending 6 hours ((once you count boarding and de boarding) in those nasty seats
I know that AF will not normally fly their equivalent planes beyond a certain distance (initially they were intended for domestic only but this has now been extended to flights of up to 2hr30 I think.) not sure if lh has any such restriction. Ive seen the neo flights regularly used to LCA and even saw them used to CAI. I realise its a commercial decision but spare a thought for people often spending 6 hours ((once you count boarding and de boarding) in those nasty seats
No one is forcing anyone to fly BA. If one doesn't fancy BA to CAI, well then there's Egyptair, or countless options with a transfer; out of London there's usually another player, if not two or more, for most routes. If BA doesn't give you what you need/want, then look elsewhere it's what I'd say.
