Should there be a limit to where BA use NEO?
#31
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Platinum
Posts: 939
European carriers are all heading in the same direction with their Neos with lightweight slimline seats in the range of 8 to 9 kg per seat unit. So for the A320neo with the SpaceFlex rear galley/wc module its either 180 or 186 seats depending on number of front galley/storage modules fitted.
The Neo is a great aircraft, but is unfortunately crap from a comfort perspective down the back. Had one on my recent EDI-LHR, for which the cheapo Recaro seats are tolerable. However the toilet down the back was an interesting experience - very narrow and cramped and not a pleasant experience. Or at least the one with the cabin crew seat on the door was; I didn't use the other one. One of the FAs also told me.the galleys were pretty much the same - cramped.
in addition to comfort, the small galleys did make me wonder how suitable they really are on the longer sectors, with the lack of space potentially posing problems if there's a lot of food been ordered.
I find BA's Recaro seat much better than easyJet's. It still isn't good, but it is a bit firmer and therefore gives me better back support. easyJet's seat gives me back pain on longer sectors.
#32
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Silver, IHG Gold
Posts: 453
Have only flown the seats once and it wasn’t great but wasn’t awful. But I do sometimes worry that it’s little steps towards the lowest common denominator with airlines. On an individual level each thing can be dismissed as “okay and manageable” and people complaining about them seem as nit-picking but you miss the overall change once you add little things together.
I realise it’s not the end of the world and I realise little things like menus, tables in the middle seats and hot towels in CE aren’t going to kill anyone but it just takes that shine off things that little bit.
I realise it’s not the end of the world and I realise little things like menus, tables in the middle seats and hot towels in CE aren’t going to kill anyone but it just takes that shine off things that little bit.
#33
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Original Poster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,499
we actually have the opposite example on TLV where Ba essentially flies long haul planes to attract much of the connecting traffic and is rather successful doing so!
CAI is not tlv but it still has significant traffic. Lca has less but still quite a bit not least since half o f Russia now seems to be living there!
my guess is Ba won’t lose much to lh but maybe to qr?
#34
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: BA, Virgin, Lufthansa
Posts: 183
#35
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: ORK
Posts: 68
Reminds me of the plush seats in the front cabin on the Dom/Eur 767s compared with the ironing boards down the back.
The railways are very much the same - GWR class 387s and Northern class 158s have recently seen dreadful ironing boards installed:
The railways are very much the same - GWR class 387s and Northern class 158s have recently seen dreadful ironing boards installed:
#36
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Houston
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler, *A Gold, Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hertz Five Star,
Posts: 1,301
Seat outfitting is usually up to the operator (BA) so this is not really a Neo issue. At least this is true for US operators and Boeing planes.
#37
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: A3*G,BA Silver
Posts: 2,010
It is, of course, subjective but I see nothing horrible about these seats. My husband flew at the back 3 weeks ago as Row 27 was the only one available following a cancelation, he's tall (180cm) and has long legs but he can't remember a single 'horrible' thing about the seat. A flat bed it ain't, but it is a completely acceptable seat even on longer flights.
Have you actually flew in one of these planes at the back? There is a general consensus that the seat is very tight not only on BA planes but with other airlines such as Aegean.
#38
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, TK Elite, HHonors Lifetime Diamond
Posts: 7,683
Yes, of course, I flew on one of these planes at the back. My knees were not crushed. I am 179cm. I think some people think about the number rather than how it actually feels to sit in that seat. I have seen very tall guys with long legs being uncomfortable in that seat, but for someone of my height and built it is not an issue.
#39
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not here; there!
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold
Posts: 29,531
I can't comment on the quality of the seats, but I am constantly amazed that the major U.S. carriers -- who are also subject to competition from low-cost carriers with tight seating -- typically offer greater seat pitch in their regular Economy seats than BA offers in Club Europe.
#40
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: London
Programs: Sir Ratechaser Seigneur de la Patience d'un Saint (Mucci), BA Silver, Starbucks Gold
Posts: 2,539
Well this thread has been an education for me, which I can only put down to the fact that I've not sat further back than an exit row on SH for many years. Those rear seats look grim and it's yet another reason to keep silver (if I am to also keep flying BA), just to ensure I never end up in one of them
#43
Ambassador, British Airways; FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leeds, UK
Programs: BA GGL/CCR, GfL, HH Diamond
Posts: 42,887
I can't comment on the quality of the seats, but I am constantly amazed that the major U.S. carriers -- who are also subject to competition from low-cost carriers with tight seating -- typically offer greater seat pitch in their regular Economy seats than BA offers in Club Europe.
Last edited by KARFA; Jan 8, 2023 at 2:06 pm
#44
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 155
For the routes that went to this from the ex-BMI A321s with mid-haul CW+WT configurations, it was a complete destruction of the passenger experience. I guess it was a relatively small number of passengers driven into the hands of the competition, with the efficiency savings making it worthwhile as they'll probably be able to fill a plane with unknowing individuals for a good few years.
#45
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 2,216
Just to provide one further data point having experienced these seats on a LHR-HEL back in 2018. To quote @Coffeemadman "Have only flown the seats once and it wasn’t great but wasn’t awful," I'd agree completely. Definitely something that I will avoid but not at the expense of flying from LTN or STN!