BA move to Terminal 8 at JFK/ American abolishing international first class
#16
Join Date: May 2014
Location: BRU
Programs: BA GGL, TK E (*G), ITA exec
Posts: 4,090
I'm happy with international J cabins on AA, especially when flying the 773 with the mini-cabin. The only case when I would prefer F on AA is on the transcon, due to the single seat.
This autumn I'll try AA F for the first time, but only because of the new policy regarding using GUFs also on AA services. I'll be curious to see if there is any tangible difference from J.
In any case, if ground Flagship services - especially at LAX - are not impacted by AA dropping F cabins, I'm ok with that.
This autumn I'll try AA F for the first time, but only because of the new policy regarding using GUFs also on AA services. I'll be curious to see if there is any tangible difference from J.
In any case, if ground Flagship services - especially at LAX - are not impacted by AA dropping F cabins, I'm ok with that.
#17
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: Aadvantage platinum; IHG Spire
Posts: 546
This autumn I'll try AA F for the first time, but only because of the new policy regarding using GUFs also on AA services. I'll be curious to see if there is any tangible difference from J.
In any case, if ground Flagship services - especially at LAX - are not impacted by AA dropping F cabins, I'm ok with that.
In any case, if ground Flagship services - especially at LAX - are not impacted by AA dropping F cabins, I'm ok with that.
#18
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: Aadvantage platinum; IHG Spire
Posts: 546
I'm not sure how the fact that AA has complimentary upgrades to J on domestic flights has much bearing on their ability to sell F seats on international flights. I think the better argument is the one mentioned in the article: J seats today (at least on AA, non-suite BA J seats are a different story) are good enough that the upgrade to F often isn't worth it (from a hard product perspective at least). On my most recent flight on AA, I considered doing a miles upgrade from J to F (25k miles, no cash outlay) but ultimately decided the F seat wouldn't be worth it; especially for an overnight flight when I planned on sleeping anyways.
#19
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: AA Executive Platinum (Oneworld Emerald)
Posts: 135
BA has GUFs, which (AFAIK) can also be used to get to F. Also I doubt there's a large number of people using SWUs to go to F from J - the marginal benefit is relatively low so in most cases it's a waste of a SWU.
#20
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: AA Executive Platinum (Oneworld Emerald)
Posts: 135
I'm happy with international J cabins on AA, especially when flying the 773 with the mini-cabin. The only case when I would prefer F on AA is on the transcon, due to the single seat.
This autumn I'll try AA F for the first time, but only because of the new policy regarding using GUFs also on AA services. I'll be curious to see if there is any tangible difference from J.
In any case, if ground Flagship services - especially at LAX - are not impacted by AA dropping F cabins, I'm ok with that.
This autumn I'll try AA F for the first time, but only because of the new policy regarding using GUFs also on AA services. I'll be curious to see if there is any tangible difference from J.
In any case, if ground Flagship services - especially at LAX - are not impacted by AA dropping F cabins, I'm ok with that.
#22
Join Date: May 2014
Location: BRU
Programs: BA GGL, TK E (*G), ITA exec
Posts: 4,090
Good to know.
#23
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wolverhampton
Programs: BA Silver, Hilton Diamond, Marriot Gold, Radisson Gold, Amex Platinum
Posts: 1,607
Hang on, I've flow AA J a few times via PHL, and transcon to LAX from JFK. Did they not serve champagne on those? Did they fob me off with something else and not show me the bottle? I thought it was only the domestic J which did that.
#24
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: Aadvantage platinum; IHG Spire
Posts: 546
#25
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: Aadvantage platinum; IHG Spire
Posts: 546
sorry I meant the stemmed glass is only in F! Although I think it was a different champagne on F from J….
#26
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: AA ExecPlat; AF Gold; UA GS; Hyatt L. Globalist; Marriott Plat; Hilton Diamond; National EE
Posts: 6,159
Of course there will be some routes where people are buying AA First tickets, for example LAX-LHR and JFK-LHR, just not enough to maintain sufficient aircraft with a First cabin. I do not know how the joint venture income sharing will vary when only BA is offering First.
#27
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Wolverhampton
Programs: BA Silver, Hilton Diamond, Marriot Gold, Radisson Gold, Amex Platinum
Posts: 1,607
#28
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC/London
Programs: BA GfL, Marriott GfL
Posts: 62
I travelled through JFK T8 this morning. New gates and extension looked pretty much complete. From the dropoff area you can see through into the new lounge area which looks like it is still being worked on. Lots of hammering and activity around the Flagship First check-in area. Zipwall up around the gate 16 area where I assume they are punching through the wall to connect with the new gates.
#29
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,592
As a matter of interest, why is an American with a shiny card who expects some free upgrades mainly on domestic flights any more of a “freeloader” than a Brit with a shiny card who expects to be able to guzzle food and champers in a lounge at an airline’s expense when travelling on cheapo economy tickets?
I guess the primary routes will be LHR-JFK and LHR-LAX but the joint venture shared revenue will mean AA don't lose out as everything is shared and BA can pick those passengers up on a codeshare.
#30
Join Date: Aug 2022
Programs: AA Executive Platinum (Oneworld Emerald)
Posts: 135
It's no different in as much as everyone is trying to get something for free, all be it the revenue lost on a glass of champers is going to be small compared to the revenue lost on that last minute F ticket that can't be completed because the seats already been given away.
I guess the primary routes will be LHR-JFK and LHR-LAX but the joint venture shared revenue will mean AA don't lose out as everything is shared and BA can pick those passengers up on a codeshare.
I guess the primary routes will be LHR-JFK and LHR-LAX but the joint venture shared revenue will mean AA don't lose out as everything is shared and BA can pick those passengers up on a codeshare.
Either way, I suspect the loss of F from the AA fleet will not have a huge impact on the plans for JFK T8 for the reasons mentioned already: BA (and several other OW airlines) will continue to be flying F, and JFK is probably one of, if the not the, most heavy F destinations in the world.
AA has also experimented with a "Business Plus" concept, which is a J fare that includes all of the usual F goodies on the ground (so FFD access, Flagship Check-in, etc), so they seem to at least be exploring the possibility of trying to keep the First class ground components alive. I wouldn't count on that though, because I think they'll run into the same issues they ran into with F: the benefits just don't seem worth the money to the vast majority of AA's customers.