BA196 Diverted for the convenience of VIP pax?
Jul 4, 2022, 3:26 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: DSM
Programs: AA Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Fairmont Platinum, United Silver, National Exec
Posts: 1,035
BA196 Diverted for the convenience of VIP pax?
On 03 July, BA196 IAH-LHR diverted to YYT (St. John’s, Newfoundland). Per Expertflyer, appears to say that the diversion was due to VIP passenger convenience.
Im sitting at YYT and the BA 777-300 is sitting on a side taxiway a good distance from the terminal.
Im sitting at YYT and the BA 777-300 is sitting on a side taxiway a good distance from the terminal.
Jul 4, 2022, 3:31 am
#2
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,769
Don't be misled by the VIP bit. Overwhelmingly the reason will be someone fell ill on the aircraft and YYT has a superb process for getting people off the aircraft and into the nearby hospital with the minimum of fuss. So if the Medilink people advised an offload, a captain would normally hope to be in the vicinity of St. John's NL. It's a bit unusual to be overnighted, usually they can turn around in around 90 minutes there.
Jul 4, 2022, 3:41 am
#4
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Deepest Darkest Devon
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 77
VIP = Very Ill Person?
Gallows humour aside, I think this is more likely the result of limited reasons available to list for a diversion rather than a plane full of passengers genuinely being diverted for one person’s convenience, no matter how important they are. If medical, hopefully the person got the treatment required and makes a full recovery.
Gallows humour aside, I think this is more likely the result of limited reasons available to list for a diversion rather than a plane full of passengers genuinely being diverted for one person’s convenience, no matter how important they are. If medical, hopefully the person got the treatment required and makes a full recovery.
Jul 4, 2022, 7:39 am
#6
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: UK - Hampshire & London
Programs: Mucci de Guardian des Celliers des Grands Crus 1e Classé, plus BAEC.
Posts: 2,732
Jul 4, 2022, 11:03 am
#8
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA 1K, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Titanium, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 7,969
If there were only limited reasons available to list as the cause of a diversion, why would one of them be "COMMERCIAL PUBLICITY / PASSENGER CONVENIENCE, VIP" and them not have a diversion reason for medical emergency? That seems very unlikely to me.
Jul 4, 2022, 11:21 am
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,713
Jul 4, 2022, 12:22 pm
#10
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: clue is in the nym
Programs: BA Gold, TP Gold, VS Gold, Hilton Diamond, IHG Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 831
Consider that a Medical Emergency falls within the 'Passenger Convenience' part of the IATA code rather than the Commercial Publicity bit.
Passenger Convenience being "not dying in a metal (or composite) tube at 35,000 ft', although as the Notes might suggest, actual death could also fall within this category
Passenger Convenience being "not dying in a metal (or composite) tube at 35,000 ft', although as the Notes might suggest, actual death could also fall within this category
Jul 4, 2022, 1:36 pm
#12
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 587
Consider that a Medical Emergency falls within the 'Passenger Convenience' part of the IATA code rather than the Commercial Publicity bit.
Passenger Convenience being "not dying in a metal (or composite) tube at 35,000 ft', although as the Notes might suggest, actual death could also fall within this category
Passenger Convenience being "not dying in a metal (or composite) tube at 35,000 ft', although as the Notes might suggest, actual death could also fall within this category
We would divert to offload a very sick person, we would likely not divert to offload a body.
Jul 4, 2022, 2:14 pm
#13
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,059
If someone were in a bad way and in such need of hospital to necessitate a diversion, I’d suggest they probably are the most important person at that time, certainly in terms of decisions being made. VIP therefore seems apt in any case.
Jul 4, 2022, 3:42 pm
#15
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 16