Community
Wiki Posts
Search

BA48/49 delayed 4 and 5 May

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2022, 9:47 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Silver, IHG Spire Ambassador, Accor Silver, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 276
BA48/49 delayed 4 and 5 May

Does anyone have any insight into what is causing the delay for BA48 and 49 (LHR to SEA/SEA to LHR) today and tomorrow?
ibbitsc is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 9:54 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Berlin
Programs: BAEC; LH M&M; HH Diamond
Posts: 814
May the 4th be with you.
AlienInTheFatherland is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 10:30 am
  #3  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,782
I'm going to guess a repeat of the previous problem: these are 787-10 routes, so First is sold. However there are no crew bunks on this aircraft so any departure late from LHR of more than about 115 minutes means the original crew, used at boarding, goes out of hours, so they then need to refresh the crew before departure. They can't swap with a 787-8 due to First, and 787-9 has far fewer seats, and BA holds precisely 2 of the 787-10 model, so a problem on day 1 will work through to day 4 very quickly.

The better option frankly would be to downgrade 8 First passengers so that the cabin can be used for crew rest, and 250 other people can get on with their travels, but you can imagine the uproar that would cause.
nancypants likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old May 4, 2022, 10:34 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,365
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
I'm going to guess a repeat of the previous problem: these are 787-10 routes, so First is sold. However there are no crew bunks on this aircraft so any departure late from LHR of more than about 115 minutes means the original crew, used at boarding, goes out of hours, so they then need to refresh the crew before departure. They can't swap with a 787-8 due to First, and 787-9 has far fewer seats, and BA holds precisely 2 of the 787-10 model, so a problem on day 1 will work through to day 4 very quickly.

The better option frankly would be to downgrade 8 First passengers so that the cabin can be used for crew rest, and 250 other people can get on with their travels, but you can imagine the uproar that would cause.
That is not the reason for the delay today.
Airprox is online now  
Old May 4, 2022, 10:35 am
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Silver, IHG Spire Ambassador, Accor Silver, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 276
Originally Posted by Airprox
That is not the reason for the delay today.
Are you able to share what is, and why it is knocking on to tomorrows flights as well?
ibbitsc is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 11:06 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Programs: BA Silver, for now at least...
Posts: 580
The 275 (LAS) is also 3+ hours late tonight. Hoping this doesnt happen tomorrow (as I am on it ). This is an A350 route.

Insight appreciated?
Professor Yaffle is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 11:14 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,365
Originally Posted by ibbitsc
Are you able to share what is, and why it is knocking on to tomorrows flights as well?
Technical defect. Knock is as noted by CWS above, there are only 2 B787-10s in service.
Airprox is online now  
Old May 4, 2022, 12:22 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, Wash. USA
Posts: 1,531
It looks like they've swapped a 787-9 for the 78X today, so I presume one of the 78Xs has gone tech and the other one is spoken for.
chucko is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 12:31 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 115
Originally Posted by chucko
It looks like they've swapped a 787-9 for the 78X today, so I presume one of the 78Xs has gone tech and the other one is spoken for.
4th May BA49 LHR-SEA and BA48 SEA-LHR are both showing as delayed overnight, so not sure where you are seeing the swap with a 789?

ZBLA looks to be broken as ZBLB is currently on a Chicago rotation and allocated to do 5th May’s BA49 and BA48.
ibbitsc and wrp96 like this.
G_CIVV is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 12:35 pm
  #10  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,782
Originally Posted by chucko
It looks like they've swapped a 787-9 for the 78X today, so I presume one of the 78Xs has gone tech and the other one is spoken for.
And delayed overnight to 10:00 hrs tomorrow and thus arriving in SEA in their morning too. I can see about 30 empty seats on it, mainly in WT, so presumably half a dozen CW are going to be asked to go on the other SEA service tomorrow or indirectly.
corporate-wage-slave is online now  
Old May 4, 2022, 2:05 pm
  #11  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Silver, IHG Spire Ambassador, Accor Silver, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 276
Looks like both today's and tomorrow's BA48's are each delayed by 24hrs..... I'm due on the BA48 tomorrow, so really hope it isn't delayed by a day as I need to be back in the UK on Friday.
ibbitsc is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 2:57 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 140
Just had email saying BA48 on 7th September has just been cancelled!
HSR1234 is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 3:10 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: BA, Virgin, Lufthansa
Posts: 183
BA48 on June 15th has just been cancelled too - was only rebooked onto it on the w/e, was previously on BA52 on the same day but my Alaska connection to it got cancelled!
dajdavies is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 4:32 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Helvetia
Programs: AS; BA Silver; UA; HH Gold; Sprüngli Connaisseur
Posts: 2,912
The 78Xs seem to be of surprisingly poor quality. On my flight over to SEA on one I thought it was really noisy. My wife had to speak quite loudly at me, while last year on an AA 777 we could talk fairly well. We were right over the wing box, but still....
greg5 is offline  
Old May 4, 2022, 4:55 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,059
Originally Posted by greg5
The 78Xs seem to be of surprisingly poor quality. On my flight over to SEA on one I thought it was really noisy. My wife had to speak quite loudly at me, while last year on an AA 777 we could talk fairly well. We were right over the wing box, but still....
Row 1 on a recent 78X ORD-LHR offered the quietest take-off and inflight experience I’ve ever had, so clearly cabin position has a huge impact (perhaps more so than on others?) As one of the world’s lightest sleepers, I was out like a light and slept soundly for several hours.
Confus is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.