Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Jet2 Optional Face Masks - will BA follow?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2022, 4:01 am
  #271  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
I did actually come to ask if they provided these.

Also, my other question is are BA doing a kit like VS were doing (with two masks and hand santiser packets)?
MiraculousM is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 4:02 am
  #272  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,233
Originally Posted by xenole
I'm unsure why we wear seat belts on a plane.
There's not been a single occasion on hundreds of flights ive taken, even during turbulence, where I've been thrown forward, lifted out of my seat etc.
If the plane hits the ground, or falls apart mid-air, i doubt during that 1 in a whatever chance, a seat belt would make the slightest difference to my chances. Not sure how much evidence there is that they actually save lives. Probably more likely to be hit by a rolling trolley or a bag during any turbulence.
OT, but while we're on the topic of seatbelts. You might spend your whole flying career without needing them, but there are instances where you do. A few years ago an Emirates flight was rocked by turbulence so intense that the aftermath showed how passengers literally bounced off the seats and into the overhead panels. I've seen photos of cracked panels with very visible blood stains. My wife had a diversion once, when working at Gatwick, because one particularly stupid woman was refusing to attach her infant to the extension seatbelt while turbulences were ongoing. The poor boy literally flew into the overhead panel and sustained life-changing injuries.

They're there for a reason.
EJetter, DaveS and AJA_ like this.
13901 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 4:44 am
  #273  
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,110
Originally Posted by MiraculousM
Unfortunately if you know anything about twitter, your algorithm is what makes you see what you do. Twitter is actually, in no way, left leaning.

As someone that has worked in the NHS throughout the pandemic, the Uk has been awful with masks, abusing the sunflower lanyards and with a lot of grown ups throwing their toys out of the pram because they didnt want to wear one. The numbers of admissions in the hospitals are going up again since everything was dropped and businesses like wilko are telling staff they wont get paid if they test positive and have no symptoms and dont go to work.

I, for one, am glad they are keeping the masks. And to the person that said its not going to kill you if you get it on a plane.. its not killing you.. but some passengers may have relatives that could get very sick. Not to bring up long covid. I assume most of you, like myself, are not the youngest of people? Knowing a few staff members that have long covid, its not a good thing to have.
I also worked and still work in the NHS, in a clinical role (not that it matters but figured I must say for context), I believe you have misunderstood, or potentially I might not have made myself clear when insinuating the UK has been good with masks. A country that’s been compliant with masks and excellent is Spain, in terms of compliance, UK has been poor.

What I was trying to say is that the general UK’s attitude towards masks has better than what Twitter suggests and better than what say the US perceives it, ie. in both these spheres, mask-wearing is attached with a nonsensical political attachment rather than a health consideration. Now if you re-read what I said, I was stating that the UK in general (outside of Twitter echo chamber, which I am aware can skew to one side of the other, it’s never balanced, reasoned debate there!), has not viewed masks as a political issue and in general you will rather equal proportions of mask refusers and mask enthusiasts on all sides of the spectrum.

Irrespective of this, I still believe we’ve reached a stage where it needs to move to choice. We’ve got a lot of tools to protect us (ongoing boosters, new emerging treatments of which more will keep coming through as time goes by), you know as well as I do that the NHS is and was overwhelmed even before COVID at the slightest uptick, yes we have to protect our health systems to ensure they can safely deliver services, but also, we do need to move on or at least adapt in some way.
LETTERBOY likes this.
AirbusA350 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 4:52 am
  #274  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 17,008
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
There are reports of BA agents providing masks at the gate. I've also witnessed crew handing out masks on board.
Those unhappy with the gentle BA approach might spare a thought for those of us who occasionally wander offline.

The other day Lufhansa crew in the "welcome on board" position were handing out the flimsy blue masks to passengers entering the aircraft mask-free, and to those wearing masks other than the flimsy blue ones. I understand refusal to wear a mask requires a medic-signed certificate or you are off-loaded.

One member of the cabin crew was so fired up with mask enthusiasm he patrolled the aisle after take-off, berating those with poor mask-wearing technique.
IAN-UK is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 4:53 am
  #275  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: UK
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Platinum
Posts: 940
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
Is that the new term for a DYKWIA? 😁
If it catches on, the credit is all yours.
Tobias-UK and AirbusA350 like this.
Bohinjska Bistrica is online now  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 5:12 am
  #276  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 814
I do find the seatbelt analogy a bit insulting. I have never met anyone who considers wearing a seatbelt to be even a minor imposition. Once you fit it comfortably, you don't know it's there.

A face mask is a very different thing. I entirely appreciate that there are plenty of people who have no issue or discomfort at all from wearing one. I accept that in good faith. But I really wish that they would similarly accept in good faith that many of us do consider it a big deal; that we find wearing them deeply uncomfortable; and that placing an obstacle between someone's mouth and nose and the air is a significant imposition (even if you ultimately think it is the right thing to do). Ultimately something that lots of people care about is a big deal, even if you don't care about it yourself.

That is ultimately why I think BA's policy on this is important, given that it takes (or at least will quite soon take) something from being a mandate to being a matter of personal choice.
Never Stansted is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 5:32 am
  #277  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 557
Originally Posted by xenole
I'm unsure why we wear seat belts on a plane.
There's not been a single occasion on hundreds of flights ive taken, even during turbulence, where I've been thrown forward, lifted out of my seat etc.
I suggest you try some domestic coastal routes in the autumn and winter-storms in Norway. You can feel both both shaken and stirred when the plane lands after 30 mins in bumpy holding and lands at the third attempt in severe turbulence.
Discus is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 5:42 am
  #278  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA Exec Club
Posts: 580
Originally Posted by Never Stansted
I do find the seatbelt analogy a bit insulting. I have never met anyone who considers wearing a seatbelt to be even a minor imposition. Once you fit it comfortably, you don't know it's there.

A face mask is a very different thing. I entirely appreciate that there are plenty of people who have no issue or discomfort at all from wearing one. I accept that in good faith. But I really wish that they would similarly accept in good faith that many of us do consider it a big deal; that we find wearing them deeply uncomfortable; and that placing an obstacle between someone's mouth and nose and the air is a significant imposition (even if you ultimately think it is the right thing to do). Ultimately something that lots of people care about is a big deal, even if you don't care about it yourself.

That is ultimately why I think BA's policy on this is important, given that it takes (or at least will quite soon take) something from being a mandate to being a matter of personal choice.
I really like this post as it eloquently captures my views too - I did my bit, but I am afraid now 2yrs in I do find as a glasses wearer that masks are a significant imposition on my quality of life and that being triple jabbed is more important than a piece of cloth.

I utterly respect anyones right to choose to wear one, but I would ask that equally people respect my right to choose not to wear one.
jimlad48 is online now  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 6:58 am
  #279  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 2,685
Originally Posted by Never Stansted
I do find the seatbelt analogy a bit insulting. I have never met anyone who considers wearing a seatbelt to be even a minor imposition. Once you fit it comfortably, you don't know it's there.

A face mask is a very different thing. I entirely appreciate that there are plenty of people who have no issue or discomfort at all from wearing one. I accept that in good faith. But I really wish that they would similarly accept in good faith that many of us do consider it a big deal; that we find wearing them deeply uncomfortable; and that placing an obstacle between someone's mouth and nose and the air is a significant imposition (even if you ultimately think it is the right thing to do). Ultimately something that lots of people care about is a big deal, even if you don't care about it yourself.

That is ultimately why I think BA's policy on this is important, given that it takes (or at least will quite soon take) something from being a mandate to being a matter of personal choice.
People cried a lot about seatbelts when they were introduced in cars. Uncomfortable (especially for women), no evidence of effectiveness and so on. And yet people eventually got used to them so that we are in the situation you describe now where "I have never met anyone who considers wearing a seatbelt to be even a minor imposition." I considered it hard to breathe in a mask when I first wore them for a flight. Now, they're not a problem unless we're talking about 18 hours plus of transfers.
MiraculousM likes this.
mpkz is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 7:00 am
  #280  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 460
Originally Posted by Ldnn1
Personally I don’t see how faking an exemption is respectful to crew or anyone else. I can’t stand masks but I don’t pretend I’m exempt.
I'm not faking my exemption. I have had a valid one since day 1. I occasionally wear a mask as the path of least resistance for a very short time but it does impact me severely. To the extent that I restricted my activities somewhat since July 2020. I am no longer prepared to do that.
Ladyfliestheredwhiteandblues is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 7:42 am
  #281  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 814
Originally Posted by mpkz
People cried a lot about seatbelts when they were introduced in cars. Uncomfortable (especially for women), no evidence of effectiveness and so on. And yet people eventually got used to them so that we are in the situation you describe now where "I have never met anyone who considers wearing a seatbelt to be even a minor imposition." I considered it hard to breathe in a mask when I first wore them for a flight. Now, they're not a problem unless we're talking about 18 hours plus of transfers.
And many of us have dutifully worn masks for the last two years, and still find them an imposition, and still find them hard to breathe in. If seatbelts were made non-mandatory tomorrow I am entirely certain the vast majority of people would continue to wear them. As for masks, Jet 2 and TUI have started the experiment for us, and it's already clear that at least 90% of people have immediately dumped them.
Never Stansted is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 7:44 am
  #282  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: VIE
Programs: SAS EBS / *A Silver, Hilton Diamond, Radisson VIP, IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,757
BA website has been updated and it now confirms that masks are no longer needed if neither origin nor destination country requires them. There is no list though so it's hard to know how they interpret rules for specific countries.
the810 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 7:46 am
  #283  
formerly JackDann
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,651
Originally Posted by the810
BA website has been updated and it now confirms that masks are no longer needed if neither origin nor destination country requires them. There is no list though so it's hard to know how they interpret rules for specific countries.
I'm sure it said the same thing yesterday?
JD1905 is online now  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 8:05 am
  #284  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: VIE
Programs: SAS EBS / *A Silver, Hilton Diamond, Radisson VIP, IHG Platinum
Posts: 3,757
Originally Posted by JackDann
I'm sure it said the same thing yesterday?
Nope. Even this morning it still said masks are required on all routes.
LETTERBOY likes this.
the810 is offline  
Old Mar 17, 2022, 8:08 am
  #285  
formerly JackDann
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 1,651
Originally Posted by the810
Nope. Even this morning it still said masks are required on all routes.
I'm pretty certain I did read something on the BA Website either yesterday or Tuesday that was pretty similar wording.
JD1905 is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.