BA B787 G-ZBKP taxiway incident Edmonton
Just seen this via Aeronews on Facebook:
G-ZBKP at Edmonton International Airport https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...e2a696ad5.jpeg |
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:
1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback 2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux 3) 777 get covered in foam 4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass |
I am glad BA is more successful at flying planes than parking them :D :tu:
|
Pushed back too far.
|
Originally Posted by BAeuro
(Post 32429124)
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:
1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback 4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass |
Originally Posted by 13901
(Post 32429156)
Double case of the wingwalker not doing exactly the job he/she's been paid to perform...
|
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
(Post 32429188)
Great, you've saved the investigation team a fortune there!
|
Originally Posted by BAeuro
(Post 32429124)
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:
1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback 2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux 3) 777 get covered in foam 4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass |
Originally Posted by BAeuro
(Post 32429124)
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:
1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback 2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux 3) 777 get covered in foam 4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass |
Originally Posted by BAeuro
(Post 32429124)
So in BA’s quietest period ever with barely any flights we have had:
1) A350 collide with 777 at Dubai on pushback 2) A380 damage taxiway at Chateauroux 3) 777 get covered in foam 4) 787 get pushed off taxiway onto grass |
Better question is what does Edmonton need that BA is delivering? I could have hitched a ride from LHR and then made my way home to Vancouver by Air Canada.
|
There's been a BA 787 flying YEG and back since at least early May (when I started driving by YEG and paying attention). Funnily enough when we were re-opening Phase I, I'd hop around daily barbecues with neighbours. Since we live along the flight path, it's nice to have had some quiet lately. But recently around 5 PM, we can't help but notice the massive BA tail grace the skies above us, massive because we rarely get a widebody 'round these parts.
I also posted this thread last month: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/brit...arked-yeg.html |
Why would cabin crew work these flights?
|
Originally Posted by makin'miles
(Post 32430653)
Why would cabin crew work these flights?
|
Originally Posted by makin'miles
(Post 32430653)
Why would cabin crew work these flights?
Originally Posted by SKT-DK
(Post 32430669)
If carrying cargo in the cabin regulations require a minimum crew to keep the cabin safe from cargo accidentally shifting out of position etc.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:15 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.