BA 787-10 deliveries
#64
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Left coast US & "a tiny island across the sea"
Programs: MUCCI, BAEC GCH (currently), AA LTG (FWIW)
Posts: 2,581
As wouldn't it be self-isolation, not quarantine, if it did apply? (Which it doesn't. And even if it did, they could go to a hotel, and then back to LHR and fly out, before the 14 days were up, i.e. the next day, or even the same day!)
rb211?
rb211?
#68
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 101
Yes, the flight was ‘created’ in the BA systems but has now been removed. I guess the aircraft must’ve failed the flight test (again!). Charleston really not doing a lot to change my mind that it’s the birthplace of second rate aircraft (certainly compared to Everett).
champ
champ
#69
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 49
Surely this late in the day BA crews must have already positioned out to CHS?
What a nightmare for BA and a embarrassment for Boeing to have one of your biggest customers there waiting but you can't get your aircraft to work.
Any idea what the technical problem is?
What a nightmare for BA and a embarrassment for Boeing to have one of your biggest customers there waiting but you can't get your aircraft to work.
Any idea what the technical problem is?
#71
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: BA Exec Club Gold, Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 208
The delivery crew position out via ATL on the normal, currently freighter, service. They only head out a couple of days before.
#74
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,202
Yes, the flight was ‘created’ in the BA systems but has now been removed. I guess the aircraft must’ve failed the flight test (again!). Charleston really not doing a lot to change my mind that it’s the birthplace of second rate aircraft (certainly compared to Everett).
champ
champ
I dare say this article which alludes to the reasons why this is now the case can also apply to Boeing’s customer here in the months and years ahead.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...ntent=business