Originally Posted by DFB_london
(Post 32214351)
astute observers will recall that even though not needed, jPMorgan was forced to take US government equity in the 2008/09 bank bail out - with the controls that came with that. Could it be that HM Treasury will be looking at that model?
|
Originally Posted by SKRan
(Post 32223147)
HM Treasury also offered cash to HSBC, Barclays, RBS, Lloyds TSB and Standard Chartered in 08/09. HSBC, Standard Chartered and Barclays did not accept any.
Anyone see any parallels here?! |
Originally Posted by SKRan
(Post 32223147)
HM Treasury also offered cash to HSBC, Barclays, RBS, Lloyds TSB and Standard Chartered in 08/09. HSBC, Standard Chartered and Barclays did not accept any.
The systemic US bank bailouts we’re not optional- and look how that worked vs. U.K. Hint - better than the RBS mess we still have. Stronger ones like Chase were limited by us government involvement from splurging cash bonuses while government funded the weaker that actually needed it. The reported Cruz non pay cut doesn’t help BA if this repeats.) perhaps that is not lost on HM Treasury this time round? |
So just how does UK-Gov support BA only with IAG setup, and not support IBeria part, the Spain gov needs cough up to support IB not uk-gov. Neither would I want the BA managment Director/board level to benefit from share prices/options during the period uk-gov inject funds
Plus didn't BA issue a shareholder dividend notice to be paid 1st June. that needs to be reined back or even cancelled. I am already disgusted that BA-Pilots are on a 50% salary, whilst WW gives up a lousy 20% with no mention of BA board eh Cruz taking a salary hit. Plus don't most Pilots/Crew etc only receive a low base salary topped up by further "in the air" on duty income, which means any cabincrew salary will be substantially reduced with zero BA flights, even before a reduction in their base (guaranteed) salary. Something that won't affect the non flying highly paid BA management and board. Even if BA has a substantial cash pile as rumoured, the conjecture(?) I read the last few days suggests BA are burning through GBP50m/day so a billion every 20days. So say 2months = 60days would be gbp3 Billion , ie a years profit etc. |
Originally Posted by scubaccr
(Post 32226265)
... with no mention of BA board eh Cruz taking a salary hit.
|
For the large pan European airline groups support should be provided on a pan European basis.
Whether that's through the likes of IAG giving the British, Spanish and Irish governments a golden share in exchange for a long term repayable government bond or something similar I don't know. |
Mark Kleinman (Sky News City) has updated on his twitter feed that “The chancellor has written to UK airlines and airports to say that while government remains determined to help viable companies through the COVID-19 crisis, direct taxpayer investment will only be considered once existing investors and other commercial options explored.“
|
Originally Posted by McG
(Post 32226341)
For the large pan European airline groups support should be provided on a pan European basis.
Whether that's through the likes of IAG giving the British, Spanish and Irish governments a golden share in exchange for a long term repayable government bond or something similar I don't know. |
Originally Posted by cafelatte
(Post 32226374)
Mark Kleinman (Sky News City) has updated on his twitter feed that “The chancellor has written to UK airlines and airports to say that while government remains determined to help viable companies through the COVID-19 crisis, direct taxpayer investment will only be considered once existing investors and other commercial options explored.“
https://twitter.com/MarkKleinmanSky/...57015567384577 |
Originally Posted by wilsnunn
(Post 32226286)
It has been announced a few days ago that Cruz is taking no salary for the next two months.
The optics don't look great when others earning a lot less are however taking a greater cut. Anyway - interesting comments from. The Government RE support to the airlines. Alternative support short of bailouts are however there too, in the meantime. |
Originally Posted by Bohinjska Bistrica
(Post 32226777)
Roughly a 16% cut.
The optics don't look great when others earning a lot less are however taking a greater cut. Anyway - interesting comments from. The Government RE support to the airlines. Alternative support short of bailouts are however there too, in the meantime. Government learning though - especially for Virgin and it tax haven based investor and US backer. Perhaps better to leave BA etc to pick over what’s left of Virgin instead? |
Originally Posted by scubaccr
(Post 32226265)
I am already disgusted that BA-Pilots are on a 50% salary, whilst WW gives up a lousy 20% with no mention of BA board eh Cruz taking a salary hit.
|
Originally Posted by scubaccr
(Post 32226265)
I am already disgusted that BA-Pilots are on a 50% salary, whilst WW gives up a lousy 20% with no mention of BA board eh Cruz taking a salary hit. Plus don't most Pilots/Crew etc only receive a low base salary topped up by further "in the air" on duty income, which means any cabincrew salary will be substantially reduced with zero BA flights, even before a reduction in their base (guaranteed) salary. Something that won't affect the non flying highly paid BA management and board. |
Interesting - and, I think, sensible - opinion piece in the Guardian arguing against a bail-out for the airlines.
The UK airline industry should first ask their own shareholders for bailouts Rishi Sunak is right: airlines should ask their own shareholders for a bailout before they tap up the Treasury for public money. (...) EasyJet and IAG, owner of British Airways, have boasted about the size of their cash balances and the depth of their credit facilities. Fine, let them use those resources. (...) Indeed, easyJet gave a perfectly-timed illustration of its riches when it distributed a £171m dividend to its shareholders, including £60m for founder Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou in Monaco, last week. Those same investors are free to recapitalise their airline should the need arise. |
Originally Posted by scubaccr
(Post 32226265)
So just how does UK-Gov support BA only with IAG setup
BBC News - Coronavirus: No extra help for airlines, chancellor says https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52027342 |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:29 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.