Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

Guardian reports 2 BA baggage handlers with Corona virus

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Guardian reports 2 BA baggage handlers with Corona virus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2020, 8:51 am
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Programs: plenty - ggl, ccr, etc, etc.
Posts: 1,704
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
A virus spreading exponentialy around the globe that kills 1 in 30. Is just "hysteria" is it?
sorry but that is scaremongering.

its not 1 in 30, but 1 in a 100 of those reported/tested.

It’s possible that where’s it’s mild then those mildly infected are being missed from that stats, so it might be less. It’s an uncertain number, But it’s is NOT 1 in 30 based on any of the better founded more scientifically based reports so far.

In this context I think it is fair to call the OP (and the above ) out - how the individuals reported became infected seems to have no relationship to their their role at BA, therefore why is it relevant to BA?

More widely, for those in denial, it’s looks probable around 70pct of us will get it. Most governments’ tactics so far seem to be just finding a way to make that less of a peak bulge of infection and more spread out,.This is so health services in Europe are not overwhelmed - and can thus focus on those most in need, ie the elderly and immune compromised.

If there’s going to be any scaremongering, then pause to think what happens when it hits the USA - with a sizeable population with no access to free at point of use healthcare.
DFB_london is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 8:53 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Flatland
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold 1MM, BA Gold, UA Peon
Posts: 6,105
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
How is it scaremongering to simply report a fact?
"Guardian reports 2 BA crew with Corona virus
I am not cancelling my flights yet but interesting to know:"

Unsure if this was intended, by the original author, to stoke concern or simply to be menacing but it isn't a harmless phrasing.
flatlander is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 8:57 am
  #18  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Programs: plenty - ggl, ccr, etc, etc.
Posts: 1,704
Originally Posted by frandrake
Too much frequent flying my friend, I am afraid the lack of normal level of oxygen are clouding your judgement and wit.

When you'll land into reality and recognise people are dying and healthcare systems are at risk of collapse, perhaps you'll show some more respect.
People die all the time. This will elevate it for sure, but perhaps suggestions that healthcare will ‘collapse’ is a response equally starved of oxygen. Let’s be clear - you can slow but you can’t stop viral transmission unless everyone self quarantines - then food and healthcare etc will collapse.
The most worrisome scenarios I’ve seen concern the US - due to its already poor healthcare (if at all) for many of those most at risk.
DFB_london is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:08 am
  #19  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: BAEC GFL, GGL, CCR; Marriott PFL, Ambassador; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,068
I certainly was not meaning to stir things up, just reporting what I saw in the Guardian (as mentioned, I erroneously wrote 'crew' and would be happy for a mod to change the subject).
mjack99 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:09 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
Originally Posted by DFB_london
But it’s is NOT 1 in 30 based on any of the better founded more scientifically based reports so far.

WHO have the most robust data out there. It's their job.
They have said a mortality rate of around 3.4%.

That is near as damn. 1 in 30.

End of story.
SW7London and crazy8534 like this.
cupsandsaucers is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:13 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,432
Originally Posted by ScruttonStreet
The scaremongering around this issue is ridiculous
Honestly, I wish you were right.
2 months ago I thought you were.
You should have a look on twitter at some of the reports from the italian ITU doctors who are dealing with the outbreak there.

I really hope that in July you can re-post, quote me and tell me how wrong I was.
crazy8534 is online now  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:25 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,432
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
WHO have the most robust data out there. It's their job.
They have said a mortality rate of around 3.4%.

That is near as damn. 1 in 30.

End of story.
Indeed, and for comparison the mortality from seasonal 'flu is around 0.1%
(US rate, annualised from data over past decade)
crazy8534 is online now  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:26 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 100
Be very careful with mortality rates - the WHO's initial report includes data from very early in the outbreak when healthcare staff in Wuhan didn't really have any idea what they were dealing with, which will lead to an inflated CFR.

However, even that report says that the CFR for those with no comorbid conditions was 1.4% (this includes the elderly), and is almost certainly an overestimate due to underdiagnosis.

CFRs are also far more useful when stratified by age and pre-existing conditions.

General opinion among epidemiologists [1, 2, 3] is that the generalised CFR is between 0.5% and 1%.
Stewie Mac likes this.
xarantine is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:27 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 23,285
Originally Posted by cupsandsaucers
WHO have the most robust data out there. It's their job.
They have said a mortality rate of around 3.4%.

That is near as damn. 1 in 30.

End of story.
If we're looking at this objectively, the WHO has said 3.4% mortality rate with the government predicting worst case scenario 80% of us will get it. That's about 1.8m deaths in the UK alone.

Even 10% of that would be fairly dramatic.
USA_flyer is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:31 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Some where in the Mountains
Posts: 5,346
Originally Posted by DFB_london

If there’s going to be any scaremongering, then pause to think what happens when it hits the USA - with a sizeable population with no access to free at point of use healthcare.
What do you mean by "When"? It's already here. But our dear leader, Trump says to keep working, even when you are sick, and COVID-19 is no big deal. So, we've got that going for us. Cheers!
toadman is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:35 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
So 5 billion people will get the virus? Right now we are at 100,000. If this isn’t scaremongering than what is ?

by the way summer is on the way, as chief medical officer said, focus is on delaying outbreak until end of flu season
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:41 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Warwickshire England
Posts: 642
Originally Posted by Worcester
The facts are that in certain groups (elderly, diabetics, smokers) the death rate is between 10-17%. Now I am not in any of the at risk groups but I can imagine being a bit worried if I was. Likely I have a less than 1% chance of death if I contract it. But I don't dismiss the fears of those are at risk and worry about my elderly parents.
I am 61, a diabetic so hit the target demographic, but I too think it’s over hype n]by the press who now onky write what’s in Twitter and forums not real news.
every year on average influenza kills 6,000, 26,000 die in road incedents, yet the fact one person has died has caused mass panic in tge stores.

ridiculous
AlanA is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 9:47 am
  #28  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 687
Originally Posted by icegirl
Once again, if people just wash their hands and avoid touching their face, they will be fine. I'm over the hysteria around this virus. The stats being mentioned in this thread are ridiculous.
argonath likes this.
mcbg1 is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 10:00 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Russia
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 125
I like the fact that a WHO official says "this is not a drill" and "time to pull out all the stops" and some people who are probably nowhere near the virology field say "that's just hysteria".
SW7London likes this.
Ivanerr is offline  
Old Mar 6, 2020, 10:02 am
  #30  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 23,285
Originally Posted by mcbg1
Once again, if people just wash their hands and avoid touching their face, they will be fine. I'm over the hysteria around this virus. The stats being mentioned in this thread are ridiculous.
How is it ridiculous. Approx 100,000 people have been diagnosed with it and approx 3,300 people have died.
ttama likes this.
USA_flyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.