Guardian reports 2 BA baggage handlers with Corona virus
#16
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Programs: plenty - ggl, ccr, etc, etc.
Posts: 1,704
its not 1 in 30, but 1 in a 100 of those reported/tested.
It’s possible that where’s it’s mild then those mildly infected are being missed from that stats, so it might be less. It’s an uncertain number, But it’s is NOT 1 in 30 based on any of the better founded more scientifically based reports so far.
In this context I think it is fair to call the OP (and the above ) out - how the individuals reported became infected seems to have no relationship to their their role at BA, therefore why is it relevant to BA?
More widely, for those in denial, it’s looks probable around 70pct of us will get it. Most governments’ tactics so far seem to be just finding a way to make that less of a peak bulge of infection and more spread out,.This is so health services in Europe are not overwhelmed - and can thus focus on those most in need, ie the elderly and immune compromised.
If there’s going to be any scaremongering, then pause to think what happens when it hits the USA - with a sizeable population with no access to free at point of use healthcare.
#17
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Flatland
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold 1MM, BA Gold, UA Peon
Posts: 6,105
"Guardian reports 2 BA crew with Corona virus
I am not cancelling my flights yet but interesting to know:"
Unsure if this was intended, by the original author, to stoke concern or simply to be menacing but it isn't a harmless phrasing.
I am not cancelling my flights yet but interesting to know:"
Unsure if this was intended, by the original author, to stoke concern or simply to be menacing but it isn't a harmless phrasing.
#18
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Programs: plenty - ggl, ccr, etc, etc.
Posts: 1,704
The most worrisome scenarios I’ve seen concern the US - due to its already poor healthcare (if at all) for many of those most at risk.
#19
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2007
Programs: BAEC GFL, GGL, CCR; Marriott PFL, Ambassador; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,068
I certainly was not meaning to stir things up, just reporting what I saw in the Guardian (as mentioned, I erroneously wrote 'crew' and would be happy for a mod to change the subject).
#20
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: GLA
Programs: BAEC: Silver. Nothing else as TopCashBack trumps all hotel programs
Posts: 801
#21
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,432
Honestly, I wish you were right.
2 months ago I thought you were.
You should have a look on twitter at some of the reports from the italian ITU doctors who are dealing with the outbreak there.
I really hope that in July you can re-post, quote me and tell me how wrong I was.
2 months ago I thought you were.
You should have a look on twitter at some of the reports from the italian ITU doctors who are dealing with the outbreak there.
I really hope that in July you can re-post, quote me and tell me how wrong I was.
#22
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: UK
Programs: BA GGL, BA Amex Prem, Amex Plat, Hilton Diamond, Sir Crazy8534 de l'ordres des aides de Pucci
Posts: 4,432
(US rate, annualised from data over past decade)
#23
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 100
Be very careful with mortality rates - the WHO's initial report includes data from very early in the outbreak when healthcare staff in Wuhan didn't really have any idea what they were dealing with, which will lead to an inflated CFR.
However, even that report says that the CFR for those with no comorbid conditions was 1.4% (this includes the elderly), and is almost certainly an overestimate due to underdiagnosis.
CFRs are also far more useful when stratified by age and pre-existing conditions.
General opinion among epidemiologists [1, 2, 3] is that the generalised CFR is between 0.5% and 1%.
However, even that report says that the CFR for those with no comorbid conditions was 1.4% (this includes the elderly), and is almost certainly an overestimate due to underdiagnosis.
CFRs are also far more useful when stratified by age and pre-existing conditions.
General opinion among epidemiologists [1, 2, 3] is that the generalised CFR is between 0.5% and 1%.
#24
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 23,285
Even 10% of that would be fairly dramatic.
#25
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Some where in the Mountains
Posts: 5,346
What do you mean by "When"? It's already here. But our dear leader, Trump says to keep working, even when you are sick, and COVID-19 is no big deal. So, we've got that going for us. Cheers!
#26
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
So 5 billion people will get the virus? Right now we are at 100,000. If this isn’t scaremongering than what is ?
by the way summer is on the way, as chief medical officer said, focus is on delaying outbreak until end of flu season
by the way summer is on the way, as chief medical officer said, focus is on delaying outbreak until end of flu season
#27
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Warwickshire England
Posts: 642
The facts are that in certain groups (elderly, diabetics, smokers) the death rate is between 10-17%. Now I am not in any of the at risk groups but I can imagine being a bit worried if I was. Likely I have a less than 1% chance of death if I contract it. But I don't dismiss the fears of those are at risk and worry about my elderly parents.
every year on average influenza kills 6,000, 26,000 die in road incedents, yet the fact one person has died has caused mass panic in tge stores.
ridiculous
#28
Suspended
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 687
#30
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 23,285
How is it ridiculous. Approx 100,000 people have been diagnosed with it and approx 3,300 people have died.