Interesting substitution of 744 instead of 787 on BA279 [LHR-SJC]
Dec 6, 2019, 9:13 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Helvetia
Programs: AS; BA Silver; UA; HH Diamond; Sprüngli Connaisseur
Posts: 2,910
Interesting substitution of 744 instead of 787 on BA279 [LHR-SJC]
I received an email notifying me that my seat on BA279 on 3.April.2020 was being changed from row 2 to row 3. Was a bit surprised, and I looked at the BA iPhone app and found out my seat ws on a 744. That seems like a pretty unusual substitution. Anyone know if BA has ever flown a 744 into SJC before?
Dec 6, 2019, 11:47 pm
#3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BRS
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 4,985
Dec 7, 2019, 12:16 am
#4
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Belfast
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 379
In economy this this sub is arguably an upgrade from the B789.
Dec 7, 2019, 1:21 am
#5
Join Date: Oct 2017
Programs: Honors Diamond
Posts: 1,635
It seems to have been changed to a 744 for the whole of the summer season.
At the same time BA seemed to have loaded significant amounts of J and F redemption availability. This could be very helpful as F in particular can be hard to find to California, especially in summer. I switched over from an SFO departure in J yesterday (but didn’t realise what had triggered seats appearing).
At the same time BA seemed to have loaded significant amounts of J and F redemption availability. This could be very helpful as F in particular can be hard to find to California, especially in summer. I switched over from an SFO departure in J yesterday (but didn’t realise what had triggered seats appearing).
Dec 7, 2019, 1:23 am
#6
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,729
There is a comment by @Boeing77W in this thread, about how SJC is going to need to do a few modifications to handle their first ever (?) passenger 747. A bit like SAN and PHX, the aircraft's landing starts being a bit of a statement compared to everything else at the airport. When this has happened before, the issue of cargo is often a contributory factor in the equipment change - the 747 handles cargo better than anything similar.
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/31811559-post26.html
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/31811559-post26.html
Dec 7, 2019, 1:38 am
#7
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
There is a comment by @Boeing77W in this thread, about how SJC is going to need to do a few modifications to handle their first ever (?) passenger 747. A bit like SAN and PHX, the aircraft's landing starts being a bit of a statement compared to everything else at the airport. When this has happened before, the issue of cargo is often a contributory factor in the equipment change - the 747 handles cargo better than anything similar.
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/31811559-post26.html
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/31811559-post26.html
Dec 7, 2019, 2:51 am
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Helvetia
Programs: AS; BA Silver; UA; HH Diamond; Sprüngli Connaisseur
Posts: 2,910
While cargo could be a driver for SJC, as it's convenient to a decent freeway net and rail. San Jose is also the third largest city in California, ahead of San Francisco. SFO is also not as easy to get to as SJC. Anyways, there are many more people around SJC than SFO, so I would expect that the PAX load is going up as well. SJC is also a major hub for AS.
But for me, it gets me within a 15 minute drive of my final destination. However, I do admit I'm pretty disappointed that I'm not going to get to try out the 787's F cabin.
BTW, turns out UA has flown the 744 into SJC on passenger flights before, but as Superbowl charters.
But for me, it gets me within a 15 minute drive of my final destination. However, I do admit I'm pretty disappointed that I'm not going to get to try out the 787's F cabin.
BTW, turns out UA has flown the 744 into SJC on passenger flights before, but as Superbowl charters.
Dec 7, 2019, 3:33 am
#9
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: BA silver
Posts: 308
Looks like the move to the 744 is accompanied by plenty of Avios availability in J&F from about late May onward.
Done the route twice and it has been super quick to get through immigration and get bags. About 40 mins from landing and you can be in your hire car and away
Done the route twice and it has been super quick to get through immigration and get bags. About 40 mins from landing and you can be in your hire car and away
Dec 7, 2019, 3:47 am
#10
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: UA Premier Exec, SPG Gold
Posts: 318
We are in CW, sounds like the refurbished are in good shape. Haven't taken BA for 7+ years and don't have a great memory of the 747s from SFO.
I am traveling with spouse at 3 kids, so perhaps the middle 4 will actually be desirable!
I am traveling with spouse at 3 kids, so perhaps the middle 4 will actually be desirable!
Dec 7, 2019, 4:16 am
#11
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, Eurostar Carte Blanche
Posts: 712
Beginning of June is WWDC, Apple’s main conference in SJC. If they had spare equipment, they could fill an A380 that week!
Dates aren’t confirmed till much closer to the time, but it is generally early June. Makes sense to temporarily up-gauge flights to the Bay Area around then.
Dates aren’t confirmed till much closer to the time, but it is generally early June. Makes sense to temporarily up-gauge flights to the Bay Area around then.
Dec 7, 2019, 8:34 pm
#12
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: AA Exec Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 64
The only 747s I’ve seen at SJC have been charter flights, and none of them have ever been parked at the gate. There is a charter ramp area down past terminal B that is used often for the charter planes of teams playing either the Sharks or 49ers. My guess would be they’ll park in that area and the passengers will have to get bussed over from the terminal.
Dec 7, 2019, 10:05 pm
#13
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PDX
Programs: AS MVPG
Posts: 2,956
This is actually a problem for me. I am 6'8" and booked LHR-SJC in June in World Traveller. I purchased exit row seats for three of us on the 787, now there are no exit rows in Y on this aircraft. Called and asked to be put on A380 to SFO instead, was told no since different city but they will be kind and offer me a refund of the seat purchase. Do you think I could convince them to change routing (via LAX) as long as my destination is still SJC? If not, best contingency if I have no choice but to stay on the 747 to SJC?
Dec 7, 2019, 10:16 pm
#14
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Somewhere between SFO and LAX...FYI aka FAT
Programs: BAEC - back to lowly blue. Marriott - Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 465
I'm really happy to see the extra reward availability; I got the seats on my return trip I wanted in F and the coveted 64J/K on the outbound. Happy dance!
Dec 8, 2019, 1:30 am
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,499
This is actually a problem for me. I am 6'8" and booked LHR-SJC in June in World Traveller. I purchased exit row seats for three of us on the 787, now there are no exit rows in Y on this aircraft. Called and asked to be put on A380 to SFO instead, was told no since different city but they will be kind and offer me a refund of the seat purchase. Do you think I could convince them to change routing (via LAX) as long as my destination is still SJC? If not, best contingency if I have no choice but to stay on the 747 to SJC?