BA on Panaroma 11th Nov - Criticism of "Tankering" Practice
#31
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Glasgow, UK
Programs: Seigneur des Tarifs Utils First Class Mucci with Honours :) - BA GGL / CCR
Posts: 1,551
Surely that makes sense though?!
If you have fuel in your tank to get to Sainsbury's (assuming you are shopping there or otherwise passing it) then filling up earlier is stupid because you are spending more time driving on a full tank.
Logically the size of fuel tanks should be halved, indeed quartered. There is no reason in the UK why you need more than 100 miles-worth of fuel in your car and the environmental benefits would be huge.
If you have fuel in your tank to get to Sainsbury's (assuming you are shopping there or otherwise passing it) then filling up earlier is stupid because you are spending more time driving on a full tank.
Logically the size of fuel tanks should be halved, indeed quartered. There is no reason in the UK why you need more than 100 miles-worth of fuel in your car and the environmental benefits would be huge.
#32
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Around somewhere
Programs: Gold, Some red card and some hotel cards.
Posts: 709
I'm a bit taken aback by some of the savings (£10-£40 per flight) - seems excessively low. Hope the programme covers how improvements in software, plane technology etc have improved fuel burn over the years.
Open question - how long does it take to fuel a narrowbody? I have always assumed that Ryanair / Easyjet etc can't refuel in their 25 minute turnarounds and always return fuel. Am I incorrect in my assertion?
I assume that this loco airlines operate more flights than BA due to entirely being shorthaul (quick google I can't find the facts) - are they not worse offenders?
I guess I can watch the programme which may reveal all, but fundamental question is - is BA the biggest offender in the UK over this?
Open question - how long does it take to fuel a narrowbody? I have always assumed that Ryanair / Easyjet etc can't refuel in their 25 minute turnarounds and always return fuel. Am I incorrect in my assertion?
I assume that this loco airlines operate more flights than BA due to entirely being shorthaul (quick google I can't find the facts) - are they not worse offenders?
I guess I can watch the programme which may reveal all, but fundamental question is - is BA the biggest offender in the UK over this?
#33
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: BAEC GGL/CR; Hilton Diamond; Mucci des Puccis
Posts: 5,609
For those interested, there are some great free reports from the IEA here:
https://www.iea.org/topics/energyefficiency/
The 2019 report is just out and I haven't looked at it much yet, the 2018 one is fairly easy to navigate and has interesting information on all segments, but transportation is key and there is a "special focus" section on aviation, so I recommend that as a starting point.
https://www.iea.org/topics/energyefficiency/
The 2019 report is just out and I haven't looked at it much yet, the 2018 one is fairly easy to navigate and has interesting information on all segments, but transportation is key and there is a "special focus" section on aviation, so I recommend that as a starting point.
#34
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Glasgow, UK
Programs: Seigneur des Tarifs Utils First Class Mucci with Honours :) - BA GGL / CCR
Posts: 1,551
Surely that makes sense though?!
If you have fuel in your tank to get to Sainsbury's (assuming you are shopping there or otherwise passing it) then filling up earlier is stupid because you are spending more time driving on a full tank.
Logically the size of fuel tanks should be halved, indeed quartered. There is no reason in the UK why you need more than 100 miles-worth of fuel in your car and the environmental benefits would be huge.
If you have fuel in your tank to get to Sainsbury's (assuming you are shopping there or otherwise passing it) then filling up earlier is stupid because you are spending more time driving on a full tank.
Logically the size of fuel tanks should be halved, indeed quartered. There is no reason in the UK why you need more than 100 miles-worth of fuel in your car and the environmental benefits would be huge.
#35
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Scotland
Posts: 377
#36
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, LH Sen, MUCCI, Junior Jet Club.
Posts: 8,101
A BA pilot was moaning about a scenario to me the other day. They'd left LHR for Scotland and were tankering round-trip fuel. At the last moment they were persuaded to take some standby crew who wanted to get home, one on the flight deck. As they approached the destination my friend starts to realise that with the extra pax - something like 400kg - they're going to be overweight. So he starts slowing down, deploying the speedbrakes, flaps early, gear down etc all in an effort to burn off just enough to get under MLW (all the while giving the jumpseater plenty of stick about them being too heavy). Then they're told they have to hold. So they land, and they've burnt off too much, so not only are they late they have to top up the tanks!
Madness.
Madness.
#37
Join Date: Feb 2018
Programs: EC Silver FC Silver
Posts: 34
Of course it makes a difference. The lighter the car, the less fuel it uses. You are effectively reducing the weight of the car by 38kg (more, actually, as petrol is presumably denser than water - EDIT: it isn't, see the very sensible reply below re petrol floating on water).
Though even then you are assuming most people drive their cars around on a full tank (might be rental car familiarity), though of course in reality most people only refill under a quarter tank, so you are comparing a 30L difference at most, at which point you are getting dangerously close to the amount of weight I could save both cars and planes by eating sensibly.
You are also talking sub 1% of the car's total weight including passengers, at which point the fuel-burning detours for top-ups will easily outweigh any benefits.
Of course we could turn this into a fun challenge / article. Try driving a car with the kids from Luton Airport to Southampton, surviving on no
Last edited by citytom; Nov 11, 2019 at 4:07 am
#38
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: BAEC GGL/CR; Hilton Diamond; Mucci des Puccis
Posts: 5,609
So if we've learned one thing from this thread, it's to do referral congas rather than clicking on dodgy blog links and gifting free transport cash to metropolitans who don't actually need to drive much...
#39
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, Hotels.com Gold
Posts: 390
So it won't work in other countries and if you proposed somehow limiting them for UK cars only that would require manufacturers to install different fuel tanks for different markets which leads to inefficiency in production, as well as the inability to take UK-market cars to other countries even for holidays.
#40
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: BAEC GGL/CR; Hilton Diamond; Mucci des Puccis
Posts: 5,609
Note also that average fuel loads are just over half a tank, assuming people fill up near empty. But we're now so far off topic, it'll take most of the Brent field output to fly us back.
#41
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,127
Having more efficient air conditioning system may have a better effect than discouraging/banning tankering (the link is a video on BBC about a potentially substantial effect that more energy-efficient air conditioning system may have on the emission):
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us...ave-the-planet
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us...ave-the-planet
#42
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 726
You think there won't be holding when (if) the runway is built? OK - maybe not immediately but Heathrow are doing it to increase capacity, not to provide relief to overstrecthed runways. There'll be holding again in a couple of years when the slots are filled up.
#43
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Provincie Antwerpen, Vlaanderen, België
Programs: MUCCI Gold
Posts: 2,512
Having more efficient air conditioning system may have a better effect than discouraging/banning tankering (the link is a video on BBC about a potentially substantial effect that more energy-efficient air conditioning system may have on the emission):
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us...ave-the-planet
https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us...ave-the-planet