BA Is Back In The Game?
VERY long time lurker braving it for my first post (please be nice!)
As you may be able to tell from my username I live in Dubai so was thrilled to hear that is was the first route for the new A350 which BA promised to be a 'game-changer' for modernising the airline. I took the A350 for the first time last week (in economy class) and then the return this week, and I have to say across the board I found the entire experience to be far more pleasant than previous BA economy flights (admittedly not for a while) - not just the seat but the whole service package as well. I know BA comes under heavy fire on FT for 'enhancements' galore but IMHO BA has really stepped up its game of late - and with the A350 could begin to be a viable contender against the 'premium' long haul airlines (Emirates, Etihad etc..). This seems to be what a lot of the flight reviewers on YouTube are saying as well. I really enjoyed the video below - I found him quite funny - but a few others have posted as well saying similar things. What do you all think of this? I'd love the opinion of the more frequent travellers and staffers as well - see if it's just the excitement of the new plane clouding my view! |
Welcome to FT and finally posting. I’m sure you’ll get the official welcome.
The new Y experience is definitely up there on the new and refurb aircraft. It’s a shame there’s still a few below par aircraft but hopefully they are disappearing over the next few years. |
The 350 is of course a big improvement but the idea that BA will start competing the ‘premium’ airlines as you said it’s a very long shot. Don’t forget that BA pretty much reached rock bottom and now is improving both the hard and soft product. Still a long way to go. BA management came, demolished the house and now they are back with a camp tend. Of course is much better than not having a house at all but still...
|
Another welcome to the board!
The A350 was designed with 3-3-3 economy in mind, and then can fit 9 seats at 18" width. This is a definite add to the comfort, particularly in the shoulders. The same cannot be said for the 787 (designed for 18.4"+ 2-4-2 but implemented as ~17.2" 3-3-3 at all but the Japanese carriers) and the venerable 777 (designed for 18"+ 3-3-3 but now increasingly a 17.4" 3-4-3) The soft-product improvements are welcome, although they are mostly reversals of earlier "enhancements". |
Welcome to FT!
Thanks for the review. Once of the criticisms of the forum is that there is a focus on J and F. When it comes to the A350 that has been true and a lot has been written about the new J seats. It's therefore nice to see something on Y which I am sure many will be interested in. |
Originally Posted by YacozA
(Post 31699236)
The A350 was designed with 3-3-3 economy in mind, and then can fit 9 seats at 18" width. This is a definite add to the comfort, particularly in the shoulders. The same cannot be said for the 787 (designed for 18.4"+ 2-4-2 but implemented as ~17.2" 3-3-3 at all but the Japanese carriers) and the venerable 777 (designed for 18"+ 3-3-3 but now increasingly a... |
Originally Posted by nancypants
(Post 31699263)
How long before airlines start ripping out the 3-3-3 and replacing with 3-4-3?
|
Thanks all - it’s not my video but I’ll happily take credit for it!
|
Originally Posted by BA6501
(Post 31699318)
One of the French locos already has...
|
Originally Posted by ermis177
(Post 31699220)
The 350 is of course a big improvement but the idea that BA will start competing the ‘premium’ airlines as you said it’s a very long shot. Don’t forget that BA pretty much reached rock bottom and now is improving both the hard and soft product. Still a long way to go. BA management came, demolished the house and now they are back with a camp tend. Of course is much better than not having a house at all but still...
- Hot or cold refreshing towels before each meal (SQ, KL, AF, LH, NZ) - Printed menus (AF, SQ) - Champagne (AF) - Cocktails (SQ) - Better headsets (DL, AF, SQ, LH) - Eyeshades (AF, SQ, DL) - Free Internet (AF for texting) As for Y shorthaul, BA seems to be the worst of all of them as you get nothing for free not even a glass of water (except water from the tank)... So there is a lot to be done still. Don't know if the bean counters at waterside are thinking of continuing the improvements or not. I remember BA said there will be improvements to shorthaul catering but we've seen nothing until now. |
Also I have realised that even the PE meals has been improved they still lacking of variety and quantity. The light refreshment in flights to ME tends to be only a margarita pizza with no other option. Quite poor compare to LH that they offer usually 2 options. On my last trip with LH to BAH the light meal was either a wrap with chicken and cheese or a wrap with salmon. I had the salmon and it was very tasty. FA asked me if I want to try the other wrap as well. In the meantime I still read reviews when people refused a second slice of pizza with BA as they are don’t seem to have any spares... A bit poor but still massive improvement compare to the Kit Kat!
|
Originally Posted by BA6948
(Post 31699940)
- Printed menus (AF, SQ)
One thing is that it reduces the clutter, and obviously keeps the tree huggers happy. |
And I will add my welcome to you britindubai too, we don't tend to get many reviews from World Traveller in this forum for some reason, we do have a thread on A350 reviews:
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/brit...iews-more.html but mostly that covers experiences from Club World. So thanks for the contribution, which is most useful. |
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
(Post 31700340)
we don't tend to get many reviews from World Traveller in this forum for some reason
|
Originally Posted by britindubai
(Post 31699740)
No way! Which one?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:50 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.