Maybe CE isn't that bad.....

Old Sep 26, 2019, 7:50 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: BA Gold | SK Gold | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,553
Putting SK aside, I do quite like BA's CE product much better than for example Lufthansa's European business class. You still get decent food, champagne, much nicer service on average and a nicer hub lounge with status (GF vs. SEN). And at least at LHR proper Group 1 boarding and not the mess when half the plane is Star Gold. But BA is also always more expensive, and much more hassle if flying between two Schengen countries.
ung1 is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 8:01 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Silver, SAS Diamond and LTG, Marriott Titanium and LT Plat, Radisson Premium
Posts: 130
Just to put some further light on SAS Plus not being a business class product - until 2013 or so, SAS used to operate three cabins/classes on short haul: Economy, Economy Extra and Business. Economy Extra was a premium economy product aimed at corporate travellers not allowed to book business, and as such it gave the “real” benefits that most corporate travellers care about (in particular, fast track security). In 2013 or so, SAS then did away with Business entirely and renamed Economy and Economy Extra to Go and Plus, respectively.

And yes, usually the chances are pretty good of getting an empty middle seat; Golds and Diamonds have a soft block, and they will move the non-existing curtain as far down as possible, “squeezing” Go together. On one memorable flight, I was the only passenger in Plus, with the divider going down to row 15 or so. Behind row 15, the Go passengers were squeezed together 6 in a row.

When I fly SAS Plus, I personally don’t care so much for the food cube, but I make full use of being able to get things from the cart for free - I find that a really nice perk, and I wish BA would do something similar for BoB (or at the very least, when they fail to load a meal for a paid CE customer!).
AverageHighFlyer is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 4:11 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: A3*G,BA Silver
Posts: 2,010
Originally Posted by ung1
Putting SK aside, I do quite like BA's CE product much better than for example Lufthansa's European business class. You still get decent food, champagne, much nicer service on average and a nicer hub lounge with status (GF vs. SEN). And at least at LHR proper Group 1 boarding and not the mess when half the plane is Star Gold. But BA is also always more expensive, and much more hassle if flying between two Schengen countries.
GF is not SEN with LH but HON which is a much better experience than GF if you fly via one of the main hubs. You get a meet and greet service and in FRA Lufthansa has its own First class terminal. You even get driven to the plane! Much better experience than the First Wing and the usual overcrowded BA F lounges.
Regarding SAS their food was never a strong field... The good thing is that you can get anything from the menu for free and as many times as you want. To be honest when my choice of meal is not available with BA i would rather if they offer that ( i have read that sometimes they do offer something from the menu for free for CE passengers but thats not the norm).
Regarding the lounges. You only dont get lounge access if its a third party lounge. You do get access to any Star alliance lounge.
ermis177 is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 6:08 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,871
Originally Posted by ung1
Putting SK aside, I do quite like BA's CE product much better than for example Lufthansa's European business class. You still get decent food, champagne, much nicer service on average and a nicer hub lounge with status (GF vs. SEN). And at least at LHR proper Group 1 boarding and not the mess when half the plane is Star Gold. But BA is also always more expensive, and much more hassle if flying between two Schengen countries.
Lufthansa is usually just as much hassle flying between 2 schengen countries unless one if the two is germany.

And going from krk to lhr or gla i do not find that ba is always more expensive
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 6:14 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,871
I suspect that SAS has programmed ALTEA's theoretical seating to try to block middle seats for those on the 'premium' tickets.

BA could have done the same in FLY for those on domestic economy tickets no matter their status if they had not introduced CE on domestic.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 6:21 pm
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: London, UK and Southern France
Posts: 18,362
Originally Posted by scottishpoet
Lufthansa is usually just as much hassle flying between 2 schengen countries unless one if the two is germany.
Not quite: not having to go through security at the hub make LH somewhat less hassle than connecting at LHR with BA (plus there is on many routes less of a detour flying via FRA/MUC compared to flying via LHR).
NickB is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 6:32 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,871
I agree no security helps, but much more likelihood of a bus gate at FRA and the possibility of a term a to schegen b connection which is worse than an a to b at lhr.

MUC is a better transit experience but less routes/flights.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Sep 26, 2019, 11:58 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Munich, Algarve, Sussex or S.F Bay Area
Programs: Mucci, BA Gold, A3*Gold, AA Plat, HH Gold, IHG Plat Amb, Marriott Plat
Posts: 4,158
Originally Posted by NickB
Not quite: not having to go through security at the hub make LH somewhat less hassle than connecting at LHR with BA (plus there is on many routes less of a detour flying via FRA/MUC compared to flying via LHR).
Changing flights at ANY airport in Europe is better than changing at LHR if you are flying between 2 Schengen countries. This because the UK is non-Schengen and because of the unnecesary additional security check at LHR flight connections.
Tafflyer is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 4:49 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: BA Gold | SK Gold | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,553
Originally Posted by ermis177
GF is not SEN with LH but HON which is a much better experience than GF if you fly via one of the main hubs. You get a meet and greet service and in FRA Lufthansa has its own First class terminal. You even get driven to the plane! Much better experience than the First Wing and the usual overcrowded BA F lounges.
Regarding SAS their food was never a strong field... The good thing is that you can get anything from the menu for free and as many times as you want. To be honest when my choice of meal is not available with BA i would rather if they offer that ( i have read that sometimes they do offer something from the menu for free for CE passengers but thats not the norm).
Regarding the lounges. You only dont get lounge access if its a third party lounge. You do get access to any Star alliance lounge.
Not at all. HON is equivalent to having a CCR card. HON requires for example at least 6x a year paid F trips. BA Gold, which gives access to GF, requires much less travel. It is equivalent to SEN - not a lounge for travelers in F, but not available to regular business passengers.
ung1 is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 4:52 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: BA Gold | SK Gold | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,553
Originally Posted by scottishpoet
Lufthansa is usually just as much hassle flying between 2 schengen countries unless one if the two is germany.

And going from krk to lhr or gla i do not find that ba is always more expensive
Flying BA vs LH on an intra-Schengen itinerary requires 2 extra passport controls plus an extra security control. There is no comparison. Being in Germany makes no difference - it is exactly the same flying FRA-TXL as FRA-MAD/OSL/ATH.
ung1 is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 6:57 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: A3*G,BA Silver
Posts: 2,010
Originally Posted by ung1
Not at all. HON is equivalent to having a CCR card. HON requires for example at least 6x a year paid F trips. BA Gold, which gives access to GF, requires much less travel. It is equivalent to SEN - not a lounge for travelers in F, but not available to regular business passengers.
Disagree. Very simple. BA has blue, bronze, silver and gold. LH has exactly the same. Miles and more member, frequent flyer, senator and Hon. CCR is just a card its not a seperate level. I do agree with you that hons requires much more travel but thats why LH decided to have a more exclusive top tier. SEN is exactly like silver on BA. You get exactly the same benefits when it comes to lounges, check in counters etc.
ermis177 is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 6:59 am
  #42  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London
Programs: plenty - ggl, ccr, etc, etc.
Posts: 1,704
Originally Posted by tuonopepper
I generally don't fly CE in Europe as don't find it worth the value, even travelling on the companies money, however on a recent trip to Stockholm I could only get a CE seat on the LHR to ARL.

Service was a bit slow to get going but decent when it did, food, drink all distinctly not bad and plenty of refills.

In contrast I flew back ARL to MAN on SAS, seeing as I had some Euro bonus miles to burn I figured I'd bid for an upgrade, which I 'won' - kind of wish BA Introduced this bidding thing!

Now typically SAS economy offering is better than BA as you get at least a drink, however their 'business' class product SAS Plus is dismal in the air..... Fast track and lounge of course we're a welcome perk. I was fairly surprised they don't block the middle seat at all (luckily no one was in 2B) and the meal was basically the snack box from the cart, you just didn't have to pay for it.

I accept that a SAS plus ticket is generally not much more than an stock economy ticket, whereas BA CE fares are often way higher than eco, I also accept that SAS frequent flyers refer to SAS plus as premium economy not business class but regardless, credit where its due, definitely one in the bag for BA!!
Its mixed. Often on Arn-lhr sas plus is more expensive than BA can sell club at, so clearly most Swedish travellers don’t think much of BA. The biggest issue with SAS is their carry on policy of 8kg stuck in 1985 and their useless Heathrow contract gate staff who combine arrogance stupidity and self importance in a way you’d never see at BA
DFB_london is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 7:19 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: BA Gold | SK Gold | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,553
Originally Posted by ermis177
Disagree. Very simple. BA has blue, bronze, silver and gold. LH has exactly the same. Miles and more member, frequent flyer, senator and Hon. CCR is just a card its not a seperate level. I do agree with you that hons requires much more travel but thats why LH decided to have a more exclusive top tier. SEN is exactly like silver on BA. You get exactly the same benefits when it comes to lounges, check in counters etc.
My comparison was between the Galleries First Lounge and the Senator Lounge, which are both mid tier lounges of their respective airline.

And Silver and SEN are not the same. Silver gets you business lounge access, whereas SEN gets you Senator lounge access (a step up from the business lounge). With LH, FTL gets business lounge access (at LH operated lounges).

Both have a more exclusive lounge (CCR and HON respectively) only available to passengers in First or top-tier customers. The fact that it is not a different color on the card, is not really relevant. To access CCR you need 5000 TP, to access HON lounge you need 600k miles in 2 years.
ung1 is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 7:37 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,076
Originally Posted by ung1
Kind of unfair comparison because SAS Plus does not pretend to be business class.
Precisely. I even remember some press coverage when they ditch it, mentioning they were the first airline in Europe to actually introduce business class on short haul.

In the times when SAS had business class, that was my choice for LHR-ARN.
mec72 is offline  
Old Sep 27, 2019, 11:06 am
  #45  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Programs: BA Gold, VS Gold, IHG Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hertz Presidents Circle.
Posts: 1,446
Originally Posted by DFB_london
Its mixed. Often on Arn-lhr sas plus is more expensive than BA can sell club at, so clearly most Swedish travellers don’t think much of BA. The biggest issue with SAS is their carry on policy of 8kg stuck in 1985 and their useless Heathrow contract gate staff who combine arrogance stupidity and self importance in a way you’d never see at BA
But realistically do they police this 8kg... Yes they have guages and scales all over the airport but I've never seen the used at the gate at all. My laptop bag weighs more than 8kg, never mind the carry on.
londonsean69 likes this.
tuonopepper is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.