Interesting potential EU261 case

Old Sep 15, 19, 5:41 pm
  #46  
THR
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 467
Itís people like the OP that make a mockery of consumer legislation, and ruin things for others.

Itís quite clearly beyond the scope/intent of the legislation.
mecabq, SteveF, ajeleonard and 1 others like this.
THR is offline  
Old Sep 15, 19, 5:47 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Programs: BA, IHG, 5C
Posts: 4,236
[QUOTE=BTPI suppose I am motivated by (i) anger at the rude and dismissive stance of the Menzies supervisor and (ii) a genuine curiosity as to how this situation would be considered in law[/QUOTE]
How can you be angered by her stance which you describe as:

Her stance appeared to be informed by her belief that, as I was there with my child, there was no suggestion of me flying alone and that I was behaving disingenuously in citing denied boarding.

It seems that she was entirely correct and you should indeed have received short shrift.

As a technical detail, Iím trying to work out how you would have presented yourself for checkin before the deadline. Did you ever say ďcan I check-inĒ rather than ďcan we...Ē? Once you realised your mistake did you actually hand over your passport for checkin, as opposed perhaps for assistance identifying your son?
pauldb is offline  
Old Sep 15, 19, 6:05 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 803
I'm just glad I wasn't behind the OP, waiting to check in while this pullava was going on. I wonder if the conversation and ensuing issue with no BP being handed over might have made it into the DYKWIA thread instead of this one.
PAL62V is offline  
Old Sep 15, 19, 6:52 pm
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Platinum & Ambassador
Posts: 10,789
Iím wondering if the outcome would have been different ifthe OP said something like ďIím a total idiot and brought the wifeís passport instead of the little ones and sheís on the way with it now ...Ē
orbitmic, nancypants and AJA_ like this.
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Sep 15, 19, 7:37 pm
  #50  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 43,242
Unlike the cancellation/delay, duty of care, and downgrade provisions, EC 261/2004 only imposes a "reasonableness" standard on the operating carrier. Going through the folly of asking OP whether he would prefer to abandon his child into the care of local child welfare authorities or wait behind with the child strikes me as affirmatively unreasonable.

The entire issue of whether the agent made a call and, if so, to whom, is a red herring. Bright red.
Often1 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 19, 9:33 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: CLT
Programs: AA, NH, Amex
Posts: 114
Right. So, you f'd up and you're trying to get paid from it.

Unbelievable...
trooper, SteveF, flygirl68 and 5 others like this.
jerseytom is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 12:57 am
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GfL+CCR, Aclub Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 24,525
Originally Posted by BTP View Post
All depends whether it was my duty to tell them I considered flying without the child, or theirs to ask me. The latter seems far more reasonable to me.
That's a very easy one. It's absolutely not BA's job let alone duty to suggest that you could fly alone. There is a more complex question as to whether they would have a duty to refuse had you asked that within check in time and seemed to be in a position to abandon a child, which is a criminal offence in most countries or whether they would have had a right to issue the boarding pass and say "it's for him to only use it if he sorts out the kid's situation first", but it is not the airline (or their representatives') job to suggest check in permutations compared to what the customers are asking.

A more common case comes when people arrive with excess luggage. An airline does not "have" to suggest that people could transfer weight to their hand luggage, what to take out, or where is the nearest bin. They are just there to remind the customers of what the allowance is.

More broadly, I think that you don't have a leg to stand on and are just wasting your time and making yourself more miserable by even thinking those things, just because you are actually angry at yourself for picking the wrong passport and trying to deflect the issue as a result and "replay" different endings.
wanaflyforless and Crismyth like this.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 1:39 am
  #53  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: London
Programs: BAEC Gold, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 314
I am really wondering that someone who is clever enough to be a Gold actually needs to post something like this; and of course your question is only theoretical in nature (so theoretical that someone was almost calling the police).

I think this not an interesting but quite an embarrassing case of EC261.
PAL62V likes this.
Duck1981 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 1:51 am
  #54  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cheltenham
Programs: KLM Plat for Life , BA Gold, Avianca Diamond, HH Silver, (OtherhalfGold), IHG Gold
Posts: 1,785
I wonder if this thread should be closed now as the OP has been well and truly chastised and nothing new is being said ?
simonsmith is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 1:53 am
  #55  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 12,593
Why was a passport necessary? What was the final destination?
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 2:13 am
  #56  
BTP
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2014
Programs: BA Gold, LH FTL
Posts: 38
It's definitely interesting to read a wide range of responses (mostly critical!), for which many thanks to all. I certainly don't feel chastised () and have learned a few things from this thread.

It is notable that most posters are taking a broad view of the circumstances vs the much more narrow matter of whether BA were justified in not checking me in despite having a valid ticket, and presenting a valid passport at check-in.

Also, whereas many people are focusing on (as they see it) me trying to make money when I had screwed up, in fact I was simply asking for advice from others based on their knowledge and experience.

Tobias - final destination was LHR. BA state on their website re ID requirements:

https://www.britishairways.com/en-gb...-visas-and-api

For flights between the UK and Republic of Ireland


If you are a citizen of the UK or Republic of Ireland who was born in that country you do not need a passport to travel between the two countries but you do require some form of photographic identification, such as a driving licence.

All other travelers require a valid passport to travel between the two countries.



I was very interested to read another poster copying an extract from Aer Lingus's website, in which they don't require photo ID for children younger than 16. I wonder why BA have adopted their more stringent requirements?
BTP is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 2:18 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1
Take accountability and responsibility. You have no one else to blame but yourself .

Get over it and move on
Realisticflyer is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 2:22 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,697
Originally Posted by Duck1981 View Post
....clever enough to be a Gold...
Thatís new to me.
orbitmic and alex67500 like this.
richardwft is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 2:23 am
  #59  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 3,605
Originally Posted by BTP View Post
...So then I had a bright idea...

You guys know how many forums FT has, the BA forum is producing all the fun threads, day in and day out there will be 5 wild stories, I don't know what's happening, lol....
alex67500 likes this.
nk15 is offline  
Old Sep 16, 19, 3:48 am
  #60  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Southern England
Programs: BA Silver, IHG Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle
Posts: 20
You turned up with invalid travel documents for your son and because of this reason alone, you did not fly. It is an unfortunate mistake to make, but these things do happen. Accept the mistake and move on.

To try and now claim EU261 compensation for denied boarding is a stretch and utterly morally wrong.
jimmauk is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread