A380 v 787-9
Sep 6, 19, 2:35 pm
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scotland, UK
Programs: BA Silver, Delta Skymiles, Hilton HHonors
Posts: 393
A380 v 787-9
Hi all,
looking to to book a trip to California in F on either the A380 (SFO) or 787-9 (SJC). Apart from the smaller cabin is the Dreamliner just as good a seat etc as the 380? Been in F on the 380 a couple of times & enjoyed it thoroughly.
Thanks,
gaz
looking to to book a trip to California in F on either the A380 (SFO) or 787-9 (SJC). Apart from the smaller cabin is the Dreamliner just as good a seat etc as the 380? Been in F on the 380 a couple of times & enjoyed it thoroughly.
Thanks,
gaz
Sep 6, 19, 4:09 pm
#3
Join Date: Oct 2013
Programs: BA Gold, VS Gold, IHG Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hertz Presidents Circle.
Posts: 861
Originally Posted by mikeyfly
In my opinion the 789 outbound would be my preferred on the day flight for a comfy seat with great IFE. I however find it quite noisy and for a feeling of extra space would fly home on the A380
Sep 6, 19, 4:57 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 13,921
Hi,
The 789 F seat does not allow for buddy dining as the tv screen is where the buddy would sit. Also only 1 F lavatory in the 789 compared to 2 in the A380 . The windows are electronically dimmed on the 789 ( they do not go completely dark IME) compared to electrically opersted blinds on the A380.
Both are good but prefer the A380
Regards
TBS
The 789 F seat does not allow for buddy dining as the tv screen is where the buddy would sit. Also only 1 F lavatory in the 789 compared to 2 in the A380 . The windows are electronically dimmed on the 789 ( they do not go completely dark IME) compared to electrically opersted blinds on the A380.
Both are good but prefer the A380
Regards
TBS
Sep 7, 19, 1:49 am
#6
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 2,777
I personally like F on the 789 better; however, one of its drawbacks is that the cabin tends to be fairly hot. The temperature can be 20C in the galley and 24-25 in the cabin. Crew told me that the space is fairly small, the airflow is disrupted by the thick curtains and therefore it gets to be a bit of a sauna. I found it's worse in the first row rather than in the second.
Sep 7, 19, 2:32 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GfL+CCR, Aclub Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 25,817
There have been several threads on that very comparison. I would recommend a search for a full range of opinions and details.
Sep 8, 19, 7:41 am
#10
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Blue, EI Silver, Honours Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 950
Im actually going to vote for the 787 on this one. For some reason I never sleep well on the A380, I don't understand why. There isn't a massive difference in the upper deck A380 and 787 cabin, but I do quite like the front, smaller, 789 CW.
Sep 8, 19, 10:35 am
#13
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR), EK Plat, TG*G
Posts: 664
Originally Posted by quakered
Surely the 787 and the A380 have the same cabin pressure at around 6,000 feet. As for a 787 being quieter than an A380 (in First), surely not! A380 every time for us.
Besides all the above of which I am not really an expert, I do personally find the environment on 787s better. I still can’t get over the single toilet choice made by BA though and surely the cabin in the A380 feels more spacious.
