Community
Wiki Posts
Search

A380 v 787-9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2019, 1:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scotland, UK
Programs: BA Silver, Delta Skymiles, Hilton Honors, IHG One Rewards, Melia Rewards
Posts: 415
A380 v 787-9

Hi all,

looking to to book a trip to California in F on either the A380 (SFO) or 787-9 (SJC). Apart from the smaller cabin is the Dreamliner just as good a seat etc as the 380? Been in F on the 380 a couple of times & enjoyed it thoroughly.

Thanks,

gaz
gaz68 is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2019, 2:16 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,254
In my opinion the 789 outbound would be my preferred on the day flight for a comfy seat with great IFE. I however find it quite noisy and for a feeling of extra space would fly home on the A380
mikeyfly is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2019, 3:09 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Programs: BA Gold, VS Gold, IHG Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hertz Presidents Circle.
Posts: 1,447
Originally Posted by mikeyfly
In my opinion the 789 outbound would be my preferred on the day flight for a comfy seat with great IFE. I however find it quite noisy and for a feeling of extra space would fly home on the A380
I'd agree with that also.
tuonopepper is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2019, 3:17 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Germany
Programs: BA GGL, CCR - TK G
Posts: 809
I prefer the more spacious a380 anytime.
Vasco Pridat is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2019, 3:57 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 17,907
Hi,

The 789 F seat does not allow for buddy dining as the tv screen is where the buddy would sit. Also only 1 F lavatory in the 789 compared to 2 in the A380 . The windows are electronically dimmed on the 789 ( they do not go completely dark IME) compared to electrically opersted blinds on the A380.

Both are good but prefer the A380

Regards

TBS
The _Banking_Scot is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2019, 12:49 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,236
I personally like F on the 789 better; however, one of its drawbacks is that the cabin tends to be fairly hot. The temperature can be 20C in the galley and 24-25 in the cabin. Crew told me that the space is fairly small, the airflow is disrupted by the thick curtains and therefore it gets to be a bit of a sauna. I found it's worse in the first row rather than in the second.
13901 is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2019, 1:32 am
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,516
There have been several threads on that very comparison. I would recommend a search for a full range of opinions and details.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Sep 7, 2019, 8:05 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Silicon Valley
Programs: BA Gold, VX Gold
Posts: 154
Note also that for the return the new SFO lounge is infinitely superior to the third party lounge at SJC
britsv is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2019, 5:00 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Scotland, UK
Programs: BA Silver, Delta Skymiles, Hilton Honors, IHG One Rewards, Melia Rewards
Posts: 415
Thanks for all the replies,

gaz
gaz68 is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2019, 6:41 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Blue, EI Silver, Honours Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,207
Im actually going to vote for the 787 on this one. For some reason I never sleep well on the A380, I don't understand why. There isn't a massive difference in the upper deck A380 and 787 cabin, but I do quite like the front, smaller, 789 CW.
BrianDromey is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2019, 8:12 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: AAdvantage
Posts: 92
Flown on both and nothing compares to the Dreamliner. I always arrive feeling more refreshed - it’s just so much quieter and the reduced pressurization difference is a godsend.
flying_pig likes this.
Fonsini is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2019, 8:49 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver IHG Platinum Elite
Posts: 177
Surely the 787 and the A380 have the same cabin pressure at around 6,000 feet. As for a 787 being quieter than an A380 (in First), surely not! A380 every time for us.
quakered is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2019, 9:35 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Posts: 778
Originally Posted by quakered
Surely the 787 and the A380 have the same cabin pressure at around 6,000 feet. As for a 787 being quieter than an A380 (in First), surely not! A380 every time for us.
I might be wrong but I thought the A380 was pressurised at something closer to 7,000ft whereas the 787 is around 6,000. I also believe that the A380 still uses a bleed air system, whereas the 787 has electric compressors (without going through the engines’ route). Someone also told me the humidity is better on 787s and A350s.

Besides all the above of which I am not really an expert, I do personally find the environment on 787s better. I still can’t get over the single toilet choice made by BA though and surely the cabin in the A380 feels more spacious.
flying_pig is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.