BA422 (LHR-VLC) emergency landing in VLC (cabin filled with smoke)
#108
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 494
Some of the early posts reported that the smoke first appeared at the start of the descent, but the consensus seems to be that it started 10 minutes before landing. My recollection as SLF is that power reduction for the descent happens much more than 20 minutes before landing, but that there are power changes much closer to landing.
Are there likely to have been power increases around 10 minutes out, and if so what would they have been associated with?
On a different theme, I usually find it difficult to count the number of rows to the exit behind me, particularly when the cabin is full. Is there any reason why the position of the emergency exits is not given in terms of row numbers? The information could be of interest, and use, to the more numerate passengers.
Are there likely to have been power increases around 10 minutes out, and if so what would they have been associated with?
On a different theme, I usually find it difficult to count the number of rows to the exit behind me, particularly when the cabin is full. Is there any reason why the position of the emergency exits is not given in terms of row numbers? The information could be of interest, and use, to the more numerate passengers.
#109
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta Metro
Programs: DL , AC, BA, Hhonors Diamond, IH Platinum, Bonvoy Gold, Hyatt Discoverist
Posts: 2,354
Whoa.
Aikaterine's pic is pretty horrifying. I don't know how s/he kept a level head during that.
And might I add: Aikaterine's posts are unusually concise, articulate, and informative. Highly worthy of the posting upgrade. Thank you.
Aikaterine's pic is pretty horrifying. I don't know how s/he kept a level head during that.
And might I add: Aikaterine's posts are unusually concise, articulate, and informative. Highly worthy of the posting upgrade. Thank you.
#110
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 410
If there were problems with the air system, it is possible that the cabin was at a different (lower) pressure than the ground. If so, the doors will be "jammed" because of the pressure difference. Opening a system in counter-pressure is quite difficult (I am a chemist, and we sometimes have the same problem with reactors and stuff), so they would have to wait for both pressures (internal and external) to equilibrate.
#111
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: HEL
Programs: BA G; AY Basic; HHonors G; Marriott S
Posts: 141
It is really strange that folks sitting in the exit row did not open the doors by themselves. After all in an emergency that is exactly what you are supposed to do. Maybe the CC were sitting there in tow 10/11/12 and told passengers not to open the doors. But 10 mins in smoke filled aircraft - you want get out.
Or cabin pressure still on and the doors would not operate.
-j
Or cabin pressure still on and the doors would not operate.
-j
#112
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chelsea
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,227
It is alarming to see how many people feel their judgment about what should or shouldn’t be done in an emergency situation is superior to that of the crew. Their SEP training is exacting. It isn’t something they can fail at. They know what they’re doing and they are exposed to the same risks as their passengers, potentially more so in the event of an emergency evacuation.
I have far more faith in them than in some dunderhead passenger in full-on blunderbuss mode.
I have far more faith in them than in some dunderhead passenger in full-on blunderbuss mode.
#113
#114
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,667
If I had been a pax on the plane and no action or announcements 10 minutes from the flightdeck after landing with a dense smoke filled cabin, I would have started to wonder if the flight crew had become overwhelmed with fumes and passed out. And that maybe the CC were doing nothing either because they were waiting instructions from the flight deck.
Am mindful of that Saudia L1011 Tri-Star incident some 40 years ago whereby sadly everyone on board perished after a fire was reported and after landing the aircraft did not evacuate - the reason why is still not fully understood. Chilling reading and would certainly ave gone through my mind if on yesterdays flight.....that maybe was nothing happening because the fine chaps upfront were incapacitated by fumes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudia_Flight_163
Notwithstanding that, nice to hear everyone is all safe
Am mindful of that Saudia L1011 Tri-Star incident some 40 years ago whereby sadly everyone on board perished after a fire was reported and after landing the aircraft did not evacuate - the reason why is still not fully understood. Chilling reading and would certainly ave gone through my mind if on yesterdays flight.....that maybe was nothing happening because the fine chaps upfront were incapacitated by fumes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudia_Flight_163
Notwithstanding that, nice to hear everyone is all safe
#115
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,065
The Airbus pressurisation system opens the outflow valves on landing, equalizing the pressure.
If the Smoke Fire and Fumes Checklist has been auctioned, and in this case I have absolutely no doubt it was, then:
a. Initially the flight crew will be planning a diversion.
b. They will be reconfiguring the electrical system to reduce electrical demands thereby eliminating most causes of smoke.
c. They will be venting cabin air overboard and stopping any recirculation of air.
If the source is not obvious then a rapid descent to 10000ft will be started.
At this point and at any time during this checklist an immediate landing is being considered. Also IF at any time the smoke is the greatest threat then the aircraft will be depressurised.
So the aircraft landing should be either depressurised, or in a normal pressurisation mode, the "jammed" doors thing is just more panicked stories or half heard things being repeated as gospel.
People behave very, very, very differently when scared. Assertive people become mice, some just freeze, others just wait for clear instruction and wait for the crew to guide them.
No emergency event is ever " perfect" and lessons are always learned. Comms from the flight deck in a smoke event are almost impossible - its darned hard just to brief the crew and it is likely that hearing the " Darth Vader" impression of a pilot on a full face oxygen mask will help calm anyone.
On the ground, again the pilots will be doing their best to assess the situation and until we know what info was presented to them we cannot really assess how or why they made their decision to stay onboard as long as they did, given the same info I may have made the same decisions as them, so can well just dial back the criticisms of who decided what and when.
To me it sounds like the cabin crew did a stellar job in a very stressful situation. Hats off to them for a job very well done. It gives me great comfort to know that I work with such professional and capable colleagues. As for the flight crew I think they did well but will await the reports and analysis to learn from their efforts.
Everyone survived and there was no panic - a job well done.
Last edited by Waterhorse; Aug 6, 2019 at 1:06 am
#116
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,917
If you are sat on an emergency exit row you are only to open the door if instructed to do so by the crew, usually by the captain giving the instruction ''passenger evacuation".
#117
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 17,908
Hi.
This is the main story on the BBC breakfast news just now.
Glad everyone made it out ok
Regards
Tbs
This is the main story on the BBC breakfast news just now.
Glad everyone made it out ok
Regards
Tbs
#118
Join Date: Feb 2009
Programs: Mucci, BA, Hilton.
Posts: 1,158
Its all a bit hypothetical though as I wouldn’t know for sure how I’d react unless I was in that situation and it’s not a criticism of anyone that was.
#119
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2002
Programs: Mucci des Hommes Magiques et Magnifiques
Posts: 19,092
A couple points that have been commented on which I would like to clarify.
I have never been trained on the Airbus but this aircraft is the A321 so no over-wing exits and each pair of exits would have at least one crew member responsible.
The pictures of the crew member on the phone is a snap shot and doesn’t mean that she was had the phone “stuck to her head”, she was taking or making a call.
There may have been no communication from the pilots but I’m absolutely sure that the cabin crew would have been shouting out commands such as to sit down and remain calm.
I have never been trained on the Airbus but this aircraft is the A321 so no over-wing exits and each pair of exits would have at least one crew member responsible.
The pictures of the crew member on the phone is a snap shot and doesn’t mean that she was had the phone “stuck to her head”, she was taking or making a call.
There may have been no communication from the pilots but I’m absolutely sure that the cabin crew would have been shouting out commands such as to sit down and remain calm.
#120
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NT Australia
Programs: QF WP
Posts: 4,160
there have been many incidents where bodies have been found, obviously having advanced past an available/open emergency exit in search for the forward door
(OT but similarly, why they push how to undo the seatbelt- because people revert to car seatbelt opening which is of course different)