Advice please on plane incident

Old May 9, 2019, 1:11 am
  #61  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,127
Originally Posted by IAMORGAN
None of us like delays but I’m sure nobody would expect another person to have to sit in those conditions for a number of hours.
Quite a few would. There are incredibly selfish people out there. I've even heard quite a few people complain after a medical diversion.
LTN Phobia is offline  
Old May 9, 2019, 3:00 am
  #62  
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 19,164
Originally Posted by LTN Phobia
Quite a few would. There are incredibly selfish people out there. I've even heard quite a few people complain after a medical diversion.
Yes, so have I. My answer is simple - one day that might be you. Self-centerdness takes a new meaning in he skies.
PUCCI GALORE is offline  
Old May 9, 2019, 4:37 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
This is so disgusting and is a health and safety issue. In the NHS, we dont deal with vomit without gloves so the fact that this passenger had to actually sit in it blows my mind and i would be likely to go to the press if i had pictures/eas not ensured that the staff would be retrained in this.

But what this thread HAS made me consider is checking my seat pocket before i relax when im on a plane.
HMPS, HarryKUK and snaxmuppet like this.
MiraculousM is offline  
Old May 9, 2019, 10:32 am
  #64  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Near the Beach.
Posts: 202
Originally Posted by avb123
Hi,

I was hopeful of some advice.

On a recent flight with my family from Orlando we boarded the plane and settled down. My son said his seat smelt funny but I thought nothing of it. A few minutes later he taps me on the shoulder and gives me a bag with sick in. I thought he had just been sick but he says he pulled it out of the seat pocket. I looked in the seat pocket and there was indeed sick in it. I took the sick off him and called over the stewardess who was mortified but as the plane was about to taxi she couldn't help me clean up.

I got read of the sick and when I came back to the seat I could see there was another sick bag on the floor which had wipes that had obviously been used to clean up sick. I explored the seat some more and his table was splattered with sick also. I started to clean up but the plane was taking off so we had to sit in the seat whilst it took off. By the time the stewardess came back over I was cleaning it all up myself. There was no other seats to move into so we were stuck there for the night flight. Naturally my kids and wife were worried the whole time about catching a bug.

I spoke to the Customer Services person who noted everything down and was very apologetic. When back in UK I fully expected an apology from BA for not cleaning the seat but nothing. I had to phone and eventually they found the report and the CS person said as a goodwill gesture he would give me 10,000 air miles. I don't want air miles, I have too many air miles. He offered the air miles to my son as well which is pointless. What really got me was that no one actually said sorry. I harassed them a bit on Twitter and someone said they would write directly to my son to apologise, this was OK in my book and should have bought the matter to a close. Again there was no sorry in the letter.. just some nonsense about investing in specialist cleaning equipment (like checking if a seat pocket is dirty?).

So the advice I am after is that BA have not actually said sorry. No acknowledgment at all that they did not clean the seat. The wording is all very particular, 'I am sure this experience was distressing', ' I understand it was upsetting', but no actual sorry. Is there any way I can make this happen? Has anyone actually got BA to say sorry? I checked to take the dispute to CEDR but they do not cover this type of incident.

I have not accepted the airmiles, nor will I. I won't be flying with them again after the next flight which is already paid for (which I asked if they would let me cancel and waive the fees .... they said no!).

Cheers
Just my 2 cents here. I do realize that their apology might mean a lot to you, but someone from them could mouth those words without meaning it. Your option could be just to let it go and put it down to a bad experience on BA, or seek legal remedies. You have a good case for arguing that the welfare of your son was endangered, as human vomit could be a bio-hazard, You might have to plonk down the solicitor fees, but from what I gathered from your post, possibly it might not be an issue for you.
LifeontheBeach is offline  
Old May 9, 2019, 7:53 pm
  #65  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,499
Originally Posted by V10
I don't, but I'm being charitable towards BA.
Hmm... ok, but in this case, being charitable towards BA comes at the cost of being rather uncharitable to the person who was sick. Imagine them reading this, they might feel a little scapegoated! Past performance would suggest that whilst your assumption that the person was sick unbeknown to crew may well be true, it may just as well be untrue, and it is entirely possible that 1) the passenger may have been sick in full knowledge of the crew who may not have reported this specifically or, 2) may have been sick in full knowledge of the crew who may have reported this specifically to no effect. I must say that personally, I would not feel confident assuming things either way.
HMPS likes this.
orbitmic is offline  
Old May 9, 2019, 8:34 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL/GFl, HH Diamond, BW Diamond, Virgin Voyages Deep Blue Extra, Blue Peter Badge Holder
Posts: 3,937
Originally Posted by orbitmic
Hmm... ok, but in this case, being charitable towards BA comes at the cost of being rather uncharitable to the person who was sick. Imagine them reading this, they might feel a little scapegoated! Past performance would suggest that whilst your assumption that the person was sick unbeknown to crew may well be true, it may just as well be untrue, and it is entirely possible that 1) the passenger may have been sick in full knowledge of the crew who may not have reported this specifically or, 2) may have been sick in full knowledge of the crew who may have reported this specifically to no effect. I must say that personally, I would not feel confident assuming things either way.
OP and son got onboard the flight, although a smell was noted, it was not immediately obvious to them what the issue was,. As they were 'about to taxi' ((and so still at the gate?) his son found a bag of vomit in the seat back pocket. CC mortified, but at that time not felt sufficient risk to hold of the departure, with at that time, the OPs impression that the vomit was confined to the seat-back pocket. Had this been the case, the biohazard risk is low provided individuals don't touch it, particularly then rubbing eyes or touching mouth etc. Subsequently (I'm not clear at what point or whether the CC were aware in order to re-evaluate the risk, a further bag of vomit was found under the seat and some streaks noted on the table. As far as we know, there has been no health consequences. It was UNDOUBTEDLY an unpleasant experience. OP contacted BA. They initially offered 10k Avios that they have increased to 20k avoid. OP has subsequently decided to not pursue this further.

WE don't have any further information that would be able to identify who was to blame. The previous pax may or may not have informed CC on the inbound flight, said CC may or may not have reported it, cleaners may or may not have acted on that report if one has been received, cleaners are unlikely to have noticed the issue (neither did the OP at first), they are unlikely to have left it if they had.

Given no health consequences, legal proceedings don't seam a good course of action- it was unpleasant but hasn't as far as we know affected anyones health (many posters appear to be over-estimating the biohazard risk here which is low - although not zero). Alternative routes have been ruled out by OP. Taking the avoid has been ruled out by the OP as they feel that this would indicate satisfaction with the outcome from BA. OP has a further flight booked with BA but has stated an intent not to fly with the airline again. Seams a logical course of action to me given the reasoning presented.

Sadly, this won't be the first case of vomit on a plane, I'm sure it won't be the last. They are mostly caused by air-travel sickness (unlikely in a hospital where infective cause is more likely) so the risk is lower than a vomit situation elsewhere, but should still be treated with appropriate care.
navylad is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 12:51 am
  #67  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,499
Originally Posted by navylad
WE don't have any further information that would be able to identify who was to blame. The previous pax may or may not have informed CC on the inbound flight, said CC may or may not have reported it, cleaners may or may not have acted on that report if one has been received, cleaners are unlikely to have noticed the issue (neither did the OP at first), they are unlikely to have left it if they had.
That is indeed exactly the point I was trying to make. ^ (the discussion came as a response to a post that suggested that the previous pax was probably to blame for not informing the crew of previous flight about having vomited. That is not something I think we can/should assume and instead I share the same open mind that you highlight above).
orbitmic is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 1:19 am
  #68  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,600
Originally Posted by nk15
Also, we don't use "stewardess" any more, it is "flight attendant".
Who is the "we" you talk of?

Steward / Stewardess is still used in the UK quite a lot. Flight Attendant is never (well hardly ever) used.
DYKWIA is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 1:21 am
  #69  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by navylad

Given no health consequences, legal proceedings don't seam a good course of action- it was unpleasant but hasn't as far as we know affected anyones health (many posters appear to be over-estimating the biohazard risk here which is low - although not zero). Alternative routes have been ruled out by OP. Taking the avoid has been ruled out by the OP as they feel that this would indicate satisfaction with the outcome from BA. OP has a further flight booked with BA but has stated an intent not to fly with the airline again. Seams a logical course of action to me given the reasoning presented.

Sadly, this won't be the first case of vomit on a plane, I'm sure it won't be the last. They are mostly caused by air-travel sickness (unlikely in a hospital where infective cause is more likely) so the risk is lower than a vomit situation elsewhere, but should still be treated with appropriate care.

This is only the case if someone doesnt have ANYTHING wrong with them. You do not know if the "vomitter" had anything wrong with them. What if they had HIV? Or Hep B? or even noro virus? Yes, this is not in hospital conditions but as noone has the medical history of the person who vomitted, there is a huge biohazard risk.
snaxmuppet likes this.
MiraculousM is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 1:39 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Plymouth, UK
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,159
As someone who has taken many cruises I know that in the case of norovirus if someone vomits near you then move away... far away! The virus can be spread in the micro-droplets from the vomit so it is airborne. You really don't want to be nearby. I realise that in a plane environment it is sometimes unavoidable but if someone throws up it might not be because of airsickness... they may be ill in other, more serious, more contagious ways. I treat all vomit as a biohazard!
HMPS and MiraculousM like this.
snaxmuppet is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 7:48 am
  #71  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL/GFl, HH Diamond, BW Diamond, Virgin Voyages Deep Blue Extra, Blue Peter Badge Holder
Posts: 3,937

Originally Posted by MiraculousM
This is only the case if someone doesnt have ANYTHING wrong with them. You do not know if the "vomitter" had anything wrong with them. What if they had HIV? Or Hep B? or even noro virus? Yes, this is not in hospital conditions but as noone has the medical history of the person who vomitted, there is a huge biohazard risk.
sorry but not knowing what caused the person to vomit doesn’t mean that it is high risk. HIV and Heoatitis B are both blood borne virus, you can’t catch either from being near, touching or inhaling vomit.

Sorry but it does really annoy me when someone adds to the stigma of HIV in-necessarily. It is a treatable chronic condition. If the person is on treatment and their viral load is undetectable, there is ZERO risk of transmission (U=U). Even if the person has a high viral load and you have blood to blood contact, the risk is still low, even if someone was sharing needles with someone who is HIV positive the risk of transmission is low. Most people with HIV diagnosed early due of unrelated medical problems in old age.

Meanwhile back to vomit as I said. It is a low but not zero risk. And this is the case not knowing for certain what caused the person to vomit and contrary to what you have stated, if the person had nothing wrong with them then the risk of infectious disease would be zero.

Originally Posted by snaxmuppet
As someone who has taken many cruises I know that in the case of norovirus if someone vomits near you then move away... far away! The virus can be spread in the micro-droplets from the vomit so it is airborne. You really don't want to be nearby. I realise that in a plane environment it is sometimes unavoidable but if someone throws up it might not be because of airsickness... they may be ill in other, more serious, more contagious ways. I treat all vomit as a biohazard!
it can cause micro-droplets and travel, but they still have to get into your mouth, so touching the droplets then putting your fingers in your mouth or eating food/drink that has been contaminated. This is why you should wash your hands before eating (a practice which for some reason people seam reluctant to do in the air).

as I said it is a Low risk which should be taken seriously but equally shouldn’t be exaggerated (I for one wouldn’t want a plane to have to divert every time someone vomits onboard for example as some here seam to be advocating).
:D!, LBP2 and snaxmuppet like this.

Last edited by navylad; May 10, 2019 at 10:22 pm
navylad is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 10:42 am
  #72  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Programs: Top Tier with all 3 alliances
Posts: 11,644
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
Who is the "we" you talk of?

Steward / Stewardess is still used in the UK quite a lot. Flight Attendant is never (well hardly ever) used.
Stewardess is considered obsolete and a negatively loaded term, tied to sexist practices of the past, so it is generally avoided in the US. I have never heard the term Steward for a male FA in the US.

I see the country differences though...I would guess that all official aviation businesses have moved away from the older term, even in the UK?
nk15 is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 11:21 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: north of heathrow
Posts: 1,106
Stewardess here! When I travel on other airlines I introduce myself and use the more general term, “Hi, I’m cabin crew too”. I never use the term ‘flight attendant’.
stephenjc and dougzz like this.
flygirl68 is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 5:53 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by flygirl68
Stewardess here! When I travel on other airlines I introduce myself and use the more general term, “Hi, I’m cabin crew too”. I never use the term ‘flight attendant’.
If I may ask, why not ? What would you be rather called ?
HMPS is offline  
Old May 10, 2019, 5:58 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: north of heathrow
Posts: 1,106
Originally Posted by HMPS
If I may ask, why not ? What would you be rather called ?
I’m fine with stewardess or cabin crew. I have nothing against flight attendant, we just don’t use it. I think it’s like pavement and sidewalk, boot and trunk.
PETER01 likes this.
flygirl68 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.