Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UD Seat Map discrepancy - BA/EF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:28 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 816
UD Seat Map discrepancy - BA/EF

Flying on the BA116 in J on 22/5, and aiming to sit on the UD if possible.

The BA site only shows 64B available to book:



ExpertFlyer shows much better availability on the UD. It doesn't seem that the seats showing as available on EF but not on BA.com are blocked given that EF normally makes clear that a seat has been blocked (i.e. 64A).




Anyone encountered this before or have any thoughts? I've looked at other flights I've got booked on EF and haven't seen the issue - the only seats unavailable on those are because they are either booked or blocked.
Never Stansted is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:33 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,365
Not all seats on the UD are available to purchase for those who cannot select them because of status. This is what I see on that same flight, which matches EF:

Airprox is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:40 am
  #3  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TPA/ABZ
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold. GGL/CCR.
Posts: 13,248
I just tried a dummy booking for that flight and the seat selection options matched those presented by Expert Flyer. See screenshot below.

I suggest you call BA. They should be able to select the seat you want from the available list (apart from 64A at the moment).

EDIT: Beaten to it and I agree that it's probably a status problem for the OP.


golfmad is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:42 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,365
Originally Posted by golfmad
I suggest you call BA. They should be able to select the seat you want from the available list (apart from 64A at the moment).
As the OP's picture shows them being asked to pay £88 for a seat in Row 64 there is obviously no free-seat granting status associated with the booking, so unless they have status which isn't attached, phoning BA isn't going to achieve anything.
Airprox is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:43 am
  #5  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TPA/ABZ
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold. GGL/CCR.
Posts: 13,248
Originally Posted by Airprox
As the OP's picture shows them being asked to pay £88 for a seat in Row 64 there is obviously no free-seat granting status associated with the booking, so unless they have status which isn't attached, phoning BA isn't going to achieve anything.
Indeed. Having read your post I added an extra bit to mine agreeing with you.
golfmad is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:44 am
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 816
Thanks very much both - helpful to know. Hopefully something will open up nearer the time. Curious that 61B is held back but 64B available to purchase...
Never Stansted is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:45 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: BA GGL, A3*G, Mucci de l'expertise des Apps
Posts: 3,365
Originally Posted by Never Stansted
Thanks very much both - helpful to know. Hopefully something will open up nearer the time. Curious that 61B is held back but 64B available to purchase...
61B is an average seat, 64B is a terrible seat.
Swanhunter likes this.
Airprox is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:45 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 12,254
OP - if you have Silver or higher status or equivalent on a One World carrier - make sure your membership number is in the booking as it will enable you to have further seat choices
mikeyfly is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:48 am
  #9  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 816
Originally Posted by mikeyfly
OP - if you have Silver or higher status or equivalent on a One World carrier - make sure your membership number is in the booking as it will enable you to have further seat choices
Thanks - alas a few years since that was the case, but starting to collect the TPs again so hopefully will have status before too long!
ThatT1Feeling likes this.
Never Stansted is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 8:57 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: London, ARN, HEL, ..... or MAN
Programs: BA GGL / GFL, Mucci Diamond!, HH Diamond, Radisson Premium, IHG Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 5,893
OP, somewhere within your account management on EF you can tell it what BA status you hold so that it can present you a seat map which is appropriate to you.

It's possible that EF either thinks you're Sliver or above if you populated it some time ago, or maybe it shows top-status seatmaps by default?? Either way, if you're not Gold, the EF seatmaps will always show a discrepancy with what you see on ba.com
ThatT1Feeling is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 9:01 am
  #11  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TPA/ABZ
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold. GGL/CCR.
Posts: 13,248
Originally Posted by ThatT1Feeling
OP, somewhere within your account management on EF you can tell it what BA status you hold so that it can present you a seat map which is appropriate to you.
It's in the Preferences part of the My Account tab. There's a place to add your BAEC number but if the OP doesn't have status associated with that number then I'm still not sure why it's presenting that information. Perhaps the OP has a different BAEC number in there which has status but is not the one used by the OP on the BA site when the booking was made?
ThatT1Feeling likes this.
golfmad is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 9:49 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,164
I agree with someone above - 64B is the weakest seat on the Upper Deck: on the aisle, and maximum foot traffic and light disturbance with the loo and galley both just behind your right shoulder...

Honestly, I would pick one of the available window seats on the Lower Deck (per ExpertFlyer) over taking 64B. Especially if 64B is going to cost £88. And especially on a JFK-LHR flight if it's (most likely) an overnight one - you will really want to just sleep on that short hop, so the noise and galley disturbance in 64B will be at maximum annoyance...doubt you'll get more than 2-3 hours of peace from the galley between the evening and breakfast meal services (noting that on this short flight you may well want to skip either or both of those yourself...much better on the JFK night flights to take advantage of the full Club World dining on the ground and then rest on the plane).

I wouldn't pay for 64B if I were you.
Never Stansted and rossmacd like this.

Last edited by ratypus; Apr 25, 2019 at 9:51 am Reason: wrong seat!
ratypus is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 10:03 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ipswich
Posts: 7,543
I would take any window seat on the LD over any aisle on the UD. But that's just me and window seats. I really dislike UD aisle seats.
rossmacd likes this.
windowontheAside is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 10:09 am
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 816
Originally Posted by golfmad
It's in the Preferences part of the My Account tab. There's a place to add your BAEC number but if the OP doesn't have status associated with that number then I'm still not sure why it's presenting that information. Perhaps the OP has a different BAEC number in there which has status but is not the one used by the OP on the BA site when the booking was made?
Originally had no number on EF at all - added my lowly Blue membership and the map remained unchanged. Though quite useful to know what might become available at T-72/T-24, and what's already been booked.
ThatT1Feeling likes this.
Never Stansted is offline  
Old Apr 25, 2019, 10:12 am
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 816
Originally Posted by ratypus
I agree with someone above - 64B is the weakest seat on the Upper Deck: on the aisle, and maximum foot traffic and light disturbance with the loo and galley both just behind your right shoulder...

Honestly, I would pick one of the available window seats on the Lower Deck (per ExpertFlyer) over taking 64B. Especially if 64B is going to cost £88. And especially on a JFK-LHR flight if it's (most likely) an overnight one - you will really want to just sleep on that short hop, so the noise and galley disturbance in 64B will be at maximum annoyance...doubt you'll get more than 2-3 hours of peace from the galley between the evening and breakfast meal services (noting that on this short flight you may well want to skip either or both of those yourself...much better on the JFK night flights to take advantage of the full Club World dining on the ground and then rest on the plane).

I wouldn't pay for 64B if I were you.
Thanks! And agree - have had 64A and 64K before and would happily pay £88 for those, but wouldn't pay for a UD aisle on a redeye. Will keep the money and chance my luck nearer the time, I think...
Never Stansted is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.