Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Ba1376 LHR to MAN took wrong turn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 23, 2019, 9:47 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: BOS/MAN
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 168
Originally Posted by London21
Ridiculous. Pilot should be disciplined for this.
Summary execution seems reasonable. Maybe they can break out the Iron Maiden? That’ll learn em!
nancypants likes this.
ObscuredByClouds is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 9:50 am
  #32  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,922
Originally Posted by HMPS
... A cul-de-sac is very obvious / visible, identifiable in the taxiway network on the ground. At least one pilot should be seeing out of the windows ?
Not in the dark, which this flight was. There is no lighting save for the taxiway lights so the view from the flightdeck will be a stream of green lights. The route to the terminal is convoluted, from what I have seen from 1F the green taxiway lights are illuminated in the blocked off area. During daylight hours it is very clear where the route is, in the dark it is far from clear.

I’ve heard of several aircraft being caught out in the hours of darkness.
HMPS, navylad and nancypants like this.

Last edited by Tobias-UK; Mar 23, 2019 at 9:56 am Reason: Bloody autocorrect!
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 10:35 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors, Virgin
Posts: 766
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK


Not in the dark, which this flight was. There is no lighting save for the taxiway lights so the view from the flightdeck will be a stream of green lights. The route to the terminal is convoluted, from what I have seen from 1F the green taxiway lights are illuminated in the blocked off area. During daylight hours it is very clear where the route is, in the dark it is far from clear.

I’ve heard of several aircraft being caught out in the hours of darkness.
If this is true then it is imperative that the airport authority has managed the situation correctly. If reports have been filed then they should have been actioned upon by both the airport and the Airline Operators in respect of ensuring that proper briefing notes are produced. If this hasn't taken place then the crew should be completely in the clear as the problem is then systemic.

I earlier used the term "no blame culture" in relation to ATC but in fact we moved to "Just Culture" a few years ago so apologies for that as i'm sure you'd all spotted it!!
HMPS and nancypants like this.
steve170461 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 11:18 am
  #34  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Programs: BAEC Gold, Delta Platinum, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, AMEX Platinum (US)
Posts: 18,486
Well, that could have been more exciting. Judging by the thread title I was going to assume they went south from Heathrow instead of north(west!)!
HMPS and nancypants like this.
Fraser is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 12:20 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors, Virgin
Posts: 766
Originally Posted by Fraser
Well, that could have been more exciting. Judging by the thread title I was going to assume they went south from Heathrow instead of north(west!)!
That's happened in the past. I know you're tongue in cheek but we try not to do "exciting" in a safety conscious industry. That's why when the BBC did a series covering ATC in the UK a few years ago, it didn't really make great watching as it was just another normal day for weeks on end of filming. It's worth remembering the worst loss of life in an aviation accident took place whilst both aircraft were on the ground.
steve170461 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 1:36 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Programs: All the usual suspects
Posts: 342
Originally Posted by HMPS
Yes " to err is human..." but pilots carry the responsibility of a few hundred lives.

A cul-de-sac is very obvious / visible, identifiable in the taxiway network on the ground. At least one pilot should be seeing out of the windows ?
You've clearly never sat in the pointy end .
nancypants likes this.
Soupdragon62 is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 2:23 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Split between MAN & AKL
Programs: BAEC GGL/CCR, SkyMiles Gold, Mucci deux fois
Posts: 619
I thought MAN employed selective route lighting.

I'm going out on a limb and presuming that whilst there is such extensive work in progress, it is not as selectable as usual.

That said, if there is work in progress, particularly on TWY A going down to A4, it it incumbent on the airport to have adequate illuminated barriers in place to prevent aircraft entering what is currently an out of service cul-de-sac.

Sounds to me like the barriers were not in place and the crew, having vacated as usual at BD, took the default route to Terminal 3.

I wonder if ATC gave a routing to stand..?

Far too many variables for armchair critics on here to hang the crew out to dry.
nancypants and Soupdragon62 like this.
PrimaVista is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 2:57 pm
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,191
Originally Posted by London21
Ridiculous. Pilot should be disciplined for this.
And they might very well be. Or possible not. But such a decision will be down to BA after a full analysis of the facts and not down to the instant uninformed comment of some on this board. And any such decision will also remain private.

There is far too much rushing to judgement on this board where every mistake should apparently result in the hanging, drawing and quartering of the miscreant by Alec Cruz in his hi viz in the middle of the CCR

Shoukd this have happened then no. But it did and no one was harmed.
HMPS and nancypants like this.
UKtravelbear is online now  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 3:47 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: LHR Air Traffic Control
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 875
Of course the pilot won’t be disciplined, unless s/he intentionally put his or her aircraft at risk through negligence, which is plainly not the case here.

The occurrence will be investigated, and lessons will be learned.

Thankfully aviation is one of the more enlightened industries, and UK airlines and UK ATC work hard (and closely together) to foster a culture where such occurrences can, and are, reported on without fear of backlash or punishment, for the benefit of all.

Such an occurrence; an aircraft misrouting, can be as a result of many factors, human (flight crew and ATC), environmental and conditional, and usually it’s a combination of some or all of them.

Without knowing anything about this specific case, I can guarantee there is not one cause.




Heathrow Tower is offline  
Old Mar 23, 2019, 7:34 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ORD
Programs: US Air, UA BA LH AI DELTA MARRIOTT CHOICE SGP
Posts: 9,883
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK


Not in the dark, which this flight was. There is no lighting save for the taxiway lights so the view from the flightdeck will be a stream of green lights. The route to the terminal is convoluted, from what I have seen from 1F the green taxiway lights are illuminated in the blocked off area. During daylight hours it is very clear where the route is, in the dark it is far from clear.

I’ve heard of several aircraft being caught out in the hours of darkness.
Thank you, facts do help to dissipate guesses.

Originally Posted by Soupdragon62
You've clearly never sat in the pointy end .
True, how about a bit more forward and high up ?
HMPS is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2019, 4:33 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: London. Or a plane.
Programs: "Only" 50,000 TPs until BA GGLfL
Posts: 2,774
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK


Not in the dark, which this flight was. There is no lighting save for the taxiway lights so the view from the flightdeck will be a stream of green lights. The route to the terminal is convoluted, from what I have seen from 1F the green taxiway lights are illuminated in the blocked off area. During daylight hours it is very clear where the route is, in the dark it is far from clear.

I’ve heard of several aircraft being caught out in the hours of darkness.
I thought illuminating closed taxiways/runways with active lighting was considered a major "no no"? It was a significant contributing factor to the SQ 6 crash in TPE.
alexwuk is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2019, 4:45 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In the sticks
Programs: VS FC Gold, BA EC Gold, Amex Centurion, EK Gold, ex-G-ATVK driver
Posts: 1,827
Originally Posted by Heathrow Tower
Thankfully aviation is one of the more enlightened industries, and UK airlines and UK ATC work hard (and closely together) to foster a culture where such occurrences can, and are, reported on without fear of backlash or punishment, for the benefit of all.



I fully agree that is indeed the quoted culture, and it’s a part of the training, but in practice instances like these don’t help their career much at least not in the company. They won’t be going on social media and telling everyone about their bad day at the office, and it won’t be appearing on their CV. That’s why indivduals’ names are generally absent from incident and accident public reporting,

The 744 incident at Johannesburg is another example similar to this one but with slightly more dramatic consequences. I doubt there was much in the way of tea and biscuits in their meetings after that event.
Howard Long is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2019, 4:57 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: LHR Air Traffic Control
Programs: BAEC Silver
Posts: 875
Originally Posted by Howard Long


I fully agree that is indeed the quoted culture, and it’s a part of the training, but in practice instances like these don’t help their career much at least not in the company. They won’t be going on social media and telling everyone about their bad day at the office, and it won’t be appearing on their CV. That’s why indivduals’ names are generally absent from incident and accident public reporting,

The 744 incident at Johannesburg is another example similar to this one but with slightly more dramatic consequences. I doubt there was much in the way of tea and biscuits in their meetings after that event.


Really don't think you can compare an incident which caused significant damage to an airframe to what supposedly happened here. Especially as we don't know exactly what happened and why.
Heathrow Tower is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2019, 5:20 am
  #44  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 18,605
We had a "Follow Me" vehicle when landing at MAN a couple of weeks ago. Not sure if this was due to it being an A380, or more of a general thing when the taxiway works are ongoing.
DYKWIA is offline  
Old Mar 24, 2019, 9:14 am
  #45  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,922
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
We had a "Follow Me" vehicle when landing at MAN a couple of weeks ago. Not sure if this was due to it being an A380, or more of a general thing when the taxiway works are ongoing.
IIRC, it was an EK aircraft that first fell foul of this - delaying its arrival by over an hour. Clearly a lesson learnt by EK!
HMPS likes this.
Tobias-UK is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.