EWR-LHR flight to be operated by Air Belgium -- should I care?
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,418
EWR-LHR flight to be operated by Air Belgium -- should I care?
BA has notified me that a spring flight I have from EWR to LHR will now be operated by Air Belgium. I have a coach seat. Should I care?
All I know about Air Belgium is that they were (are?) supposed to be a low fare airline that might someday fly to Asia. I don't think they currently operate any scheduled service. They apparently own 4 A340s, which I guess will be used for this service.
BA is willing to let me fly on another day on a BA plane if I want to. But that's not very desirable for me.
I am flying with my wife and the only time I can recall being on an A340 is with South African. Those are 2-4-2 in coach, which wouldn't be a terrible configuration for us if I can somehow snag 2 seats along the window.
Does anyone have any experience with this substitution?
All I know about Air Belgium is that they were (are?) supposed to be a low fare airline that might someday fly to Asia. I don't think they currently operate any scheduled service. They apparently own 4 A340s, which I guess will be used for this service.
BA is willing to let me fly on another day on a BA plane if I want to. But that's not very desirable for me.
I am flying with my wife and the only time I can recall being on an A340 is with South African. Those are 2-4-2 in coach, which wouldn't be a terrible configuration for us if I can somehow snag 2 seats along the window.
Does anyone have any experience with this substitution?
#2
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
#3
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,164
check those other threads, but in economy I really don't think it will make much difference - the A340 is a nice quiet aircraft (relative to, say, a 777 you might fly on BA to EWR) and has the advantage of a 2-seat block by the window (whereas the BA planes on a 777 would be 3-3-3 or 3-4-3 (can't remember where we are with densification these days...)
it will be BA catering either way
probably just stick with the flight if the timing is convenient for you
it will be BA catering either way
probably just stick with the flight if the timing is convenient for you
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 17,418
check those other threads, but in economy I really don't think it will make much difference - the A340 is a nice quiet aircraft (relative to, say, a 777 you might fly on BA to EWR) and has the advantage of a 2-seat block by the window (whereas the BA planes on a 777 would be 3-3-3 or 3-4-3 (can't remember where we are with densification these days...)
it will be BA catering either way
probably just stick with the flight if the timing is convenient for you
it will be BA catering either way
probably just stick with the flight if the timing is convenient for you
I went to BA and they want $41 each for an advance seat assignment. Too rich for my blood, so I guess I can log in at the 24 hour mark and try to snag two seats along the window?
#7
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,349
<div style="text-align:left;">
<br /><br />It appears so, and there are 787s still parked up.<br /><br />I imagine it is quite easy to bury a few flights on routes like New York where there are plenty of alternatives. And as you say most feedback is there is nothing wrong with the flight anyway.<br /><br /></div>
Yeah, it seems weird, but from the reports there seems to be "nothing really wrong" with flying Air Belgium, especially in coach. I've read that their IFE isn't great, but on an east-bound transatlantic flight (my return trip is still reportedly on BA metal), I don't really care. I mostly want to try to sleep.<br /><br />(Snip)<br /><br />Are the engine problems with their own aircraft that severe that BA still needs to do this in May?