Probable A380 Program Termination This Week - No last minute BA Order
#32
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,667
With regards to the higher crew number, that is generally proportional to the number of extra pax carried though. The 380 capacity can be thought of as a 777 capacity on the lower deck and a 767 on the top. If you look at the cabin crew required for those two aircraft the combined total is more than an A380. Plus then you need 4 highly paid pilots to operate 2 aircraft whereas the A380 needs 2. Sometimes this is 3 on very long haul aircraft but that would be 6 for running 1x 777 and a 767 on the same route. So proportionally LESS crew
#33
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,795
With regards to the higher crew number, that is generally proportional to the number of extra pax carried though. The 380 capacity can be thought of as a 777 capacity on the lower deck and a 767 on the top. If you look at the cabin crew required for those two aircraft the combined total is more than an A380. Plus then you need 4 highly paid pilots to operate 2 aircraft whereas the A380 needs 2. Sometimes this is 3 on very long haul aircraft but that would be 6 for running 1x 777 and a 767 on the same route. So proportionally LESS crew
#34
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
Totally agree. It is an ugly girl, truly and another advantage of being inside an A380 is that you don't have look at her bulging exterior. But my, she is superb to fly on, amazing power, near turbulence exempt and one arrives (almost) as fresh as a daisy. If there is one good aircraft for nervous flyers it is this one, so smooth. 777s, oh what a contrast. I had a LHR-MAD on the 777-300 a few days back and I was glad to get off. I have two EZE coming up in the next few weeks and I'm dreading it. Awful aircraft.
#35
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
With regards to the higher crew number, that is generally proportional to the number of extra pax carried though. The 380 capacity can be thought of as a 777 capacity on the lower deck and a 767 on the top. If you look at the cabin crew required for those two aircraft the combined total is more than an A380. Plus then you need 4 highly paid pilots to operate 2 aircraft whereas the A380 needs 2. Sometimes this is 3 on very long haul aircraft but that would be 6 for running 1x 777 and a 767 on the same route. So proportionally LESS crew
#36
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brexile in ADB
Programs: BA, TK, HHonours, Le Club, Best Western Rewards
Posts: 7,067
What you have to factor in is a far great growth in the Point to Point market rather than the Hub and Spoke model. Just look at the airframes which are doing well (787) and you can see which way things are going.
#37
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,667
Flexibility is a strong reason why they have not sold so well as expected - but on a route of year round high yield (HKG for example) it is proportionally less to run a single A380 rather than 2 separate smaller aircraft to haul the same number of pax. I wasn't suggesting that an A380 is always going to be lower cost than 2x smaller aircraft.
#38
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Dundee
Programs: BA Plastic. HH Diamond. Speedwell Bar Lifetime Platinum.
Posts: 1,425
A380 SuperNeoPlusXL launched in 2050 then?
#39
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
Interesting to note that some low frequency routes can quickly become too fat for B787 and larger aircraft have to be considered.
#40
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Moscow
Programs: Marriott Titanium, IHG Diamond AMB
Posts: 1,756
Are there really that many airports with serious slot restrictions with the new Istanbul in soft opening, new Beijing opening later this year, etc.? Many airports are over capacity in terms of passenger turnover, but replacing A380s with smaller planes doesn't help a lot in these cases.
#41
Ambassador, Hong Kong and Macau
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Programs: Non-top tier Asia Miles member
Posts: 19,795
But airline revenue management doesn't see it as their business to facilitate that.
They rather capture the dozen business passengers who pay for everyone else in the back, and those passengers need frequency.
#42
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,797
#43
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,667
Are there really that many airports with serious slot restrictions with the new Istanbul in soft opening, new Beijing opening later this year, etc.? Many airports are over capacity in terms of passenger turnover, but replacing A380s with smaller planes doesn't help a lot in these cases.
20 years later, the answer however has been more point-to-point (or point-to-hub) rather than congested hub to congested hub. Personally I think with the longer range single aisles starting to take-off (no pun intended) we may see this trend really accelerate now. Single aisle routes such as BRS-YYZ and NCL-ORD for example - yes I know the 757 has enabled this to some extent but those aircraft are at least 20 years old and at least two previous engine generations. The A32X NEO series aircraft take this to another level with fuel efficiency.
#44
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,753
I have always wondered if EK was a blessing in disguise for the A380 - on the one hand they have taken >100 frames but would more total have been sold to the traditional big 744 operators mentioned above if EK had not decimated their traditional Europe to Middle East, Asia and Australia markets by siphoning everything through DXB. One can only wonder about this....
#45
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644