Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

Probable A380 Program Termination This Week - No last minute BA Order

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Probable A380 Program Termination This Week - No last minute BA Order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2019, 11:34 pm
  #76  
sxc
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Accor Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Programs: CX Green, QF Platinum, BAEC Silver, Hyatt Glob
Posts: 10,780
Originally Posted by BOH
https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/pres...dy-orders.html

Emirates to take only 15 more frames but orders large number of A330 NEO and A350

Wonder if BA will order any as an end-of-line top-up. As mentioned earlier in the thread, WW has frequently said BA could use more of them, but not at the price Airbus is asking.
Given that Airbus has made a decision to end the project, I doubt that they would be interested in making any more at a cut price for BA.
sxc is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 11:49 pm
  #77  
BOH
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,667
Originally Posted by sxc
Given that Airbus has made a decision to end the project, I doubt that they would be interested in making any more at a cut price for BA.
Well I would respectfully disagree - 2021 is a minimum of 2 years away, maximum just less than 3. It is not unheard of for airlines to top up some of their fleet when the manufacturer announces a future end of production date. I recall NW did it with the DC10 and it is well known in the industry that 77W are currently available from Boeing at quite a discounted price prior to the line closing to make way for the new 77X.

Yes there are long-lead items to consider from sub-contractors so there may only be a small window of opportunity if any other airline wants to consider a top-off order. Particularly if there are some expensive long-lead items built as part of a batch that would otherwise now have to be scrapped - it is better to sell a few more frames at a heavy discount to get some return for any 380-unique parts stock which would otherwise now be scrapped.

I agree it is unlikely - but it has certainly happened before and currently Boeing are offering it with the 77W
BOH is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 12:02 am
  #78  
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: London
Programs: BA Silver (for now)
Posts: 1,000
Just been confirmed on BBC news , sad day

Edit: Seems Emirates also just placed an order for 70 odd A330 and A350 aircraft at the same time as reducing their A380 order.

Last edited by Will100; Feb 14, 2019 at 12:26 am
Will100 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 1:44 am
  #79  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
Has the second hand A380 market received a boost?
FlyerTalker39574 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:04 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 910
A sad day for passengers. As detailed upthread by others the idea of setting foot on 777’s now fills me with dread - nasty aircraft.

However as long as there’s A350, 787’s and 380’s still flying I’ll be happy, with some upper deck or F 747 thrown in also

I’ve not looked into the 777X but presume it’s as big an advancement in NVH as the 747-8 ie none. But at least the cargo capacity is good.....
David_Doyle is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:11 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK/France
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, EY Plat, etc
Posts: 351
I think the only second hand aircraft is the HiFly operated one which was used as a Thunderbird to rescue the Norwegian Pax in the US once LGW re-opened.

I expect that the lessors will be holding the baby as the residual value after 10 years will be minimal as the second hand parts market needs an large active fleet to be really worthwhile. Assume 50% residual value after 10 years at a new price of $350M (I don’t work in Aircraft Finance so have no idea of the real figures) and multiply by 250 aircraft and you get an impression of the financial damage that might be floating around the global finance system waiting to land.
Robespierre is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:33 am
  #82  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Windsor
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 909
I just know I'll be shot down for this, but what is the seeming hatred of the 777 driven by? Is it just the perception of the CW cabin as a "dorm" or is there something else behind it? Personally I think the 777 is a great aircraft.
JimEddie is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:35 am
  #83  
BOH
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Programs: IC Hotels Spire, BA Gold
Posts: 8,667
Originally Posted by JimEddie
I just know I'll be shot down for this, but what is the seeming hatred of the 777 driven by? Is it just the perception of the CW cabin as a "dorm" or is there something else behind it? Personally I think the 777 is a great aircraft.
It's very noisy in the cabin.
David_Doyle and toothy like this.
BOH is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:42 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,801
Originally Posted by Robespierre
I think the only second hand aircraft is the HiFly operated one which was used as a Thunderbird to rescue the Norwegian Pax in the US once LGW re-opened.

I expect that the lessors will be holding the baby as the residual value after 10 years will be minimal as the second hand parts market needs an large active fleet to be really worthwhile. Assume 50% residual value after 10 years at a new price of $350M (I don’t work in Aircraft Finance so have no idea of the real figures) and multiply by 250 aircraft and you get an impression of the financial damage that might be floating around the global finance system waiting to land.
After the first A380s were returned to lessors by SQ the lessors made a public statement that they recovered their investment over the duration of the lease. Further there is significant value in the engines and of course other spares, given there are over 200 A380s operating and will still be operating for the foreseeable future there is a market
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:42 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: Some
Posts: 5,249
Originally Posted by BOH
It's very noisy in the cabin.
Also air quality is poor (very dry and often I seem to develop a cold in the next couple of days), in addition to lower pressurization - it's the only aircraft I regularly seem to get a nosebleed after flying. Turbulence much more apparent than on an A380 (and even the A350, which you feel flex in a strange but not as unpleasant way rather than being bumped around by turbulence).
lost_in_translation is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:59 am
  #86  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,246
Could BA have a renewed interest in the MH’s A380s?
FlyerTalker39574 is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 2:59 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA GGL, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 910
Originally Posted by JimEddie
I just know I'll be shot down for this, but what is the seeming hatred of the 777 driven by? Is it just the perception of the CW cabin as a "dorm" or is there something else behind it? Personally I think the 777 is a great aircraft.
- Noisy
- Dorm like CW
- Higher cabin pressure than modern aircraft like 787, 350, 380
- Dryer air
- Did I mention noisy?
THO likes this.
David_Doyle is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 3:01 am
  #88  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by Jagboi
That yield graph strikes me as quite odd, as 2015 is when yields drops, yet that is also when oil prices crashed. Fuel should have been much cheaper in 2015-and again in 16 than in 2014, which should have boosted yields. Or was there a proportionately greater loss of customers in the oil and gas markets than was made up for in lower fuel costs?
The graph is of yield, not profit. If fuel prices are low, fares can be lower to match. If fares are lower, yields are lower - regardless of whether the correspondingly lower costs (because of low fuel prices) might increase profit.
Globaliser is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 3:03 am
  #89  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London
Programs: Mucci. Nothing else matters.
Posts: 38,644
Originally Posted by lost_in_translation
Also air quality is poor (very dry and often I seem to develop a cold in the next couple of days), in addition to lower pressurization - it's the only aircraft I regularly seem to get a nosebleed after flying.
Nosebleed city, as always complained of by ex-WW friend.

Coincidentally, this thread has recently come back to life on the QF board: So glad QF never bought those noisy 777s
Globaliser is offline  
Old Feb 14, 2019, 4:23 am
  #90  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 552
Originally Posted by BOH
It's very noisy in the cabin.
Depends on where you sit. The newer aircraft (including the 380, but also the 350 and 787) have, as said, higher cabin pressure and less engine noise. But the rear of the 777 is rather noisy. And, yet, that is a real difference with the 1980s with the 707 and DC8 with horrible noise. Even the first generation jumbo (747-200) was more noisy, I flew that plane several times during that era. I bet that the 777X has less noise and better cabin pressure as well.
But I consider noise generated by galley work more bothersome, so I prefer seats as far away from the galleys.
Fortunately, with EK you can book seats Y seats in the very front of the plane (rows 41-50), which also are less noisy. I have done that for my flight tonight to BNE.
airsurfer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.