Community
Wiki Posts
Search

65 min layover in LHR for CW: Too short?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2019, 6:05 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: Currently: UA 1K | Previously: AS MVPG75K, SPG Gold, Kimpton IC, HH Gold
Posts: 144
65 min layover in LHR for CW: Too short?

I'm looking to book a Club World SFO-HYD trip and found a trip that meets my scheduling needs, but the transfer time in LHR to switch flights is only 1hr 5m. Is this doable? Is it wise? Etc.
felixmendelssohn is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 6:20 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,767
It's certainly doable if the inbound is on time. You will arrive at a B or C gate (C if on the A380) and will be departing from a B or C gate, so can do connection security there. All fairly simple if you follow the guide in the dashboard.

Of course if your inbound is delayed, it could become difficult. As such you might want to take the earlier SFO flight - it depends how crucial it is for you to make the flight to HYD. If not a disaster if you misconnect, then 1h05 is ok.
Ldnn1 is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 6:28 pm
  #3  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,212
To add to Ldnn’s advice, if you happen to miss the connecting flight to HYD, there is a later flight to DEL with an onward connection to HYD. Not the most desirable plan B, I’ll grant you that
Prospero is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 7:10 pm
  #4  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
The issue is always the consequences of a misconnect. It is within MCT and therefore doable, but you do not have time to waste. If you do misconnect, you will be rebooked, but the onwards flights may be less pleasant.
Often1 is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 7:35 pm
  #5  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: Currently: UA 1K | Previously: AS MVPG75K, SPG Gold, Kimpton IC, HH Gold
Posts: 144
Thanks for the responses. I've always made decent time on connections at LHR, but in the event of a misconnect what usually happens? I assume if you're paid CW, they try to book you to another CW seat. If CW is sold out, I assume they don't put you in First, and that you have the option of taking a coach seat or waiting for the next flight that has available CW. Do I have it right?
felixmendelssohn is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 7:45 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: YYC
Programs: BA bronze, Aeroplan peon
Posts: 4,746
If everything is on time, and hour is about the minimum I like to change at LHR, also assuming you're in the same terminal. If you're inbound is late then you are eating away at slim margins.
Jagboi is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 10:00 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 26
Generally my decision to take a tight layover depends mainly on luggage. As long as the inbound isn't late, an hour sounds plenty to get yourself onto the next seat, but transfer of your luggage isn't something you can rush.

- Are you checking in luggage / how important is your luggage?
- Is where you're flying into the final destination / how inconvenient will it be if your luggage was delayed?
colinscanner is offline  
Old Feb 9, 2019, 10:30 pm
  #8  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: Currently: UA 1K | Previously: AS MVPG75K, SPG Gold, Kimpton IC, HH Gold
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by colinscanner
- Are you checking in luggage / how important is your luggage?
- Is where you're flying into the final destination / how inconvenient will it be if your luggage was delayed?
1. I will be checking a suitcase. Maybe I'll see about getting around that with a large carry-on.
2. In any event, I carry enough essentials in my carry-on that in the event my luggage were delayed, I could survive a day, maybe two.
felixmendelssohn is offline  
Old Feb 11, 2019, 4:08 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: BAEC Gold
Posts: 1,166
I'd say the 65 minute connection is OK, as it's all within T5 and no need to clear the UK border or collect luggage. Overnight flights from the US often arrive early anyway (BA block longer flight times which the jet-stream normally cuts down: e.g. JFK-LHR is 'blocked' at around 6h45 but often takes under 6h). So as long as your SFO flight departs on time, I'd say that connection is OK.

Personally though, I wouldn't book it. I'd take the earlier SFO flight. That's two long Club World flights back to back; frankly I'd want at least a couple of hours to have breakfast on the ground, shower, freshen up not in an airplane bathroom etc. There's a Club World lounge at the B Gates in T5 would be perfectly serviceable for this if you had the time. You'd board your flight to India much fresher...
SirToby likes this.
ratypus is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 11:03 am
  #10  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: Currently: UA 1K | Previously: AS MVPG75K, SPG Gold, Kimpton IC, HH Gold
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by ratypus
...I'd want at least a couple of hours to have breakfast on the ground, shower, freshen up not in an airplane bathroom etc. There's a Club World lounge at the B Gates in T5 would be perfectly serviceable for this if you had the time. You'd board your flight to India much fresher...
That's an interesting point that I hadn't really considered. Are there showers in the CW lounges at B? I've been there countless times but I never saw any.

The alternative, from my perspective, is that I take the two back to back CW flights, check in at hotel upon arrival, freshen up, and then face the day.
felixmendelssohn is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 11:18 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: AAdvantage Platinum, Hilton HHonors Diamond
Posts: 1,203
Originally Posted by ratypus
Personally though, I wouldn't book it. I'd take the earlier SFO flight. That's two long Club World flights back to back; frankly I'd want at least a couple of hours to have breakfast on the ground, shower, freshen up not in an airplane bathroom etc. There's a Club World lounge at the B Gates in T5 would be perfectly serviceable for this if you had the time. You'd board your flight to India much fresher...
Agree, I've traveled EWR-LHR-HYD and that was long enough. Coming from SFO is even worse. I enjoyed my couple of hours getting a shower and in the lounge as you stated.

Originally Posted by felixmendelssohn
That's an interesting point that I hadn't really considered. Are there showers in the CW lounges at B? I've been there countless times but I never saw any.

The alternative, from my perspective, is that I take the two back to back CW flights, check in at hotel upon arrival, freshen up, and then face the day.
T5B has showers and a (slightly less crowded) Elemis Spa. As others have echoed I'd strongly advise the earlier (16:10) SFO flight. 4 hours is just about perfect to shower and relax a bit in the lounge. At least the HYD flight is a 787 now, it used to be a 767. That should also help to arrive a bit better.
airb330 is online now  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 1:07 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Arizona
Programs: BA (GGL G4L), AA (Gold), HH (Diamond); Marriott (Gold)
Posts: 3,011
I've done a CW PHX-DFW-LHR-BOM with an hour layover at LHR. The connection was tight, arrived into the B or C gates, the flight to BOM was A10 (bus gate)... arrival into LHR was delayed about 20-30 minutes. I cleared security, walked down to A10, they had a boarding pass printed out for me, and I was one of the last two or three passengers on the bus.

I would have preferred having a longer layover at LHR to grab a shower, but the option was 1 hour or something like 12 hours (and that's why I did not take the PHX-LHR flight), so I went with the shorter layover. After arrival in BOM I had a nearly 4 hour drive to Pune due to traffic, arriving around the time the sun started to rise. It was a long journey but I managed just fine.
dylanks is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 1:21 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,767
Originally Posted by dylanks
I've done a CW PHX-DFW-LHR-BOM with an hour layover at LHR. The connection was tight, arrived into the B or C gates, the flight to BOM was A10 (bus gate)... arrival into LHR was delayed about 20-30 minutes. I cleared security, walked down to A10, they had a boarding pass printed out for me, and I was one of the last two or three passengers on the bus.
A bus gate like that for a long-haul is pretty unusual though, it must be said. Ordinarily you would expect a B/C connection.

That said I agree, the earlier flight would be more relaxed here and the B lounge is certainly a decent spot to freshen up.
Ldnn1 is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 1:50 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Falkirk, Scotland,VS Red, BA Gold, HH Diamond,UK Amex Plat
Programs: Master of the Privy Purse des Muccis
Posts: 17,907
Originally Posted by Ldnn1
A bus gate like that for a long-haul is pretty unusual though, it must be said. Ordinarily you would expect a B/C connection.

That said I agree, the earlier flight would be more relaxed here and the B lounge is certainly a decent spot to freshen up.

Hi,

When ever I have been in T5 GF I have ususally seen 1 long haul flight from A10 ( it does seem to change) so for a specific flight it would be unlikely to be from A10 it does happen.

Regards

TBS
The _Banking_Scot is offline  
Old Feb 13, 2019, 8:30 pm
  #15  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: Currently: UA 1K | Previously: AS MVPG75K, SPG Gold, Kimpton IC, HH Gold
Posts: 144
OK, I've booked the earlier SFO flight on the outbound so I'll have about 4h to freshen up. The return is going to have the 65m layover, though. Hard to avoid; the only other option is to fly into SJC, but I'm nervous about the recent SJC 787 engine-related cancellations. Moreover, the layover if I choose SJC is only slightly longer, on the order of 90m IIRC.

One additional benefit of the earlier SFO flight: 62A on the 744 upper deck!
felixmendelssohn is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.