Can BA learn anything from QR?

Old Feb 3, 2019, 10:17 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Meh
Posts: 2,592
Originally Posted by Lost-in-Space
Can BA learn anything from QR?

Yes, reincorporate in a country with a native population of just over 300,000, the third-highest hydrocarbon reserves in the world, a 2018 estimated GDP (PPP) of $357 billion (thanks Wikipedia) and thus a GDP (PPP) / person well north of $125,000***, effectively number one in the world.

Then get your government to throw oodles of cash at your national airline and that will allow the airline to satisfy the needs, demands and dreams of every single FT member. Maybe.

@:-)

*** That's based on the total population of 2.5 million including expats - although I'm pretty sure the reems of imported workers building football stadia are probably not benefitting much from that $125k!

Rant over.
Not a rant at all. What about employee rights at QR, and general human rights in the region?
stevie is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 10:23 am
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,139
I just have the feeling I should dress a little more smartly, out of respect for the CC
T8191 is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 10:56 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 489
QR have the luxury of being based in Qatar and having access to a cheap workforce with arguably questionable rights. Equally not having to answer to shareholders with bottom line profitability not being as important to Qatar as it is to IAG helps along the way.

One benefit I see is that if every aircraft touches Doha, then presumably they have access to cheap labour and can therefore have higher and more frequent cleaning standards. If every airline in London did this, then maybe BA would do the same, but it only competes with Qatar going East, and in reality it doesn't compete at all as they are part of a joint business.

A lot of people who say they'll never fly BA again after flying on Qatar are internalising a trade-off - ultimately in most cases they are turning a direct routing into a 1-stop routing, which is fine for some but it is a trade-off they are making (i know I'm looking at this from a very London centric point-of-view so don't lynch me!)
jonas123 is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 11:44 am
  #34  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by jonas123
QR have the luxury of being based in Qatar and having access to a cheap workforce with arguably questionable rights.
The ethics of not using companies associated with such questionable labour rights is a hard one for me to argue against, however a hard issue for me to avoid, thinking with and beyond this industry.

Originally Posted by jonas123
A lot of people who say they'll never fly BA again after flying on Qatar are internalising a trade-off - ultimately in most cases they are turning a direct routing into a 1-stop routing, which is fine for some but it is a trade-off they are making (i know I'm looking at this from a very London centric point-of-view so don't lynch me!)
The majority of my travel is for work, often travelling alone, and many of my journeys require at least one stop somewhere, so I have become accustomed to these and actually quite like stretching my legs part way even when a direct flight is available. Cost and Schedule are the primary factors in choosing a flight and airline though. My preference and convenience are secondary. Interestingly, I didn't have the same praise for Emirates having flown Orlando-Dubai and Lon-Dubai-Jakarta return last autumn, who presumably similarly benefit from at least some of these favourable operating environments? Arik Air is the airline I will never fly again - but that's a whole trip report in itself and most people wouldn't believe me anyway!

Last edited by rosswill; Feb 3, 2019 at 11:56 am
rosswill is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:05 pm
  #35  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: Regarded as total and utter snob amongst the BAEC community.
Posts: 971
Originally Posted by Lost-in-Space
- although I'm pretty sure the reems of imported workers building football stadia are probably not benefitting much from that $125k!

Rant over.
Originally Posted by stevie
Not a rant at all. What about employee rights at QR, and general human rights in the region?
QR's CEO once faced this issue when asked live on CNN and this was his response

george77300 likes this.
icegirl is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:13 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: BA - Blue > Bronze > Silver > Bronze > Blue
Posts: 6,812
Originally Posted by icegirl
QR's CEO once faced this issue when asked live on CNN and this was his response

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5wVBUDgrrE

a friend worked for them (back office) and while he really enjoyed the work, there were a load of very strict rules and things you most certainly were not allowed to say, or at least shouldn’t say if you values your job
Cap'n Benj is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:13 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,747
Interesting direction this thread has moved. Although I sympathise with the comments about Qatar's cheaper workforce and whether their rights are as strongly upheld as crew from 'western' countries, I fail to see how QR's possible advantage in this is any excuse for BA (or many other airlines) to be unable to at least offer similar quality food, dine-on-demand, cleaner toilets and a superior hard product. Perhaps it's a fair comment that BA would find it hard to match the number of CC and keep costs down but in so many other areas they could match QR if they wanted. It's not as if BA's fares are really any cheaper than QR.
T8191, icegirl and nancypants like this.
PAL62V is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:17 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,104
Originally Posted by stevie
Not a rant at all. What about employee rights at QR, and general human rights in the region?
If everyone based their travel habits on ethics - I would suggest there would be few destinations left to consider or national carriers to get you there!

I fail to see the difference between boycotting an airline because their employee and general rights are allegedly not up to scratch, and the majority of those who are critical of QR buying the petrol refined from oil from these regions, wear designer clothes stitched together by kids in an Asian sweat shop and purchase domestic goods from the likes of China who are hardly squeaky clean with respect to human rights.

So long as the price is right, or we need a specific item, then many of us seem to climb down from the moral high ground when it suits.
PAL62V, T8191, Oaxaca and 1 others like this.
passy777 is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:26 pm
  #39  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Programs: Regarded as total and utter snob amongst the BAEC community.
Posts: 971
Originally Posted by PAL62V
Interesting direction this thread has moved. Although I sympathise with the comments about Qatar's cheaper workforce and whether their rights are as strongly upheld as crew from 'western' countries, I fail to see how QR's possible advantage in this is any excuse for BA (or many other airlines) to be unable to at least offer similar quality food, dine-on-demand, cleaner toilets and a superior hard product. Perhaps it's a fair comment that BA would find it hard to match the number of CC and keep costs down but in so many other areas they could match QR if they wanted. It's not as if BA's fares are really any cheaper than QR.
Still a very important direction. BA already has a very large pensions deficit and general benefits and pay compared to other airlines around. Compare that with other airlines in the ME and Asia and you can see the savings and investments being made into the airline and then couple that with the fact they are state owned except for CX.
icegirl is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:33 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,394
Originally Posted by passy777
If everyone based their travel habits on ethics - I would suggest there would be few destinations left to consider or national carriers to get you there !

.............................

So long as the price is right, or we need a specific item, then many of us seem to climb down from the moral high ground when it suits.
It’s a well-made point, for sure.

Some time ago, midway through another of the (many !) QR-related threads here, I clearly recall an FT-er who was very ‘committed’ to BA so to speak, and who came on to say that - because of perceived wrongs within Qatar as a country - their airline would not be seeing “a single penny” of his money.

And when I gently reminded him that, for every ticket he bought to fly his favoured BA, Qatar are happily taking 20% of the profit on such sales, he did, in all fairness, post again with a wry acceptance along the lines of “ah .... yes, true ..... you’ve got me there .....” (or words to that effect)


passy777 and AnaTravel like this.
subject2load is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:37 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London
Posts: 489
Originally Posted by PAL62V
Interesting direction this thread has moved. Although I sympathise with the comments about Qatar's cheaper workforce and whether their rights are as strongly upheld as crew from 'western' countries, I fail to see how QR's possible advantage in this is any excuse for BA (or many other airlines) to be unable to at least offer similar quality food, dine-on-demand, cleaner toilets and a superior hard product. Perhaps it's a fair comment that BA would find it hard to match the number of CC and keep costs down but in so many other areas they could match QR if they wanted. It's not as if BA's fares are really any cheaper than QR.
It's a tricky one. There are reasons why there are rules against state aid, because ultimately you end up in a worse situation. It's very hard to compete against someone who has an unfair advantage, just ask any of Lance Armstrong's competitors in the TdF.

I also think that people forget that QR doesn't compete on many of BA's core markets, and they have a JV so as I previously said, they don't compete. I'm not saying that BA is way ahead of the competition on its other markets (i know it's not), but it's much closer.

And lastly, it's something that is often overlooked, but the number of J seats on a BA plane vs. other airlines is immense. Which other airlines have 14F and 86J seats on a single aircraft? It just shows the type of market BA serves, but ultimately you lose the feeling of exclusivity when you're sharing it with 85 other passengers.
HIDDY likes this.
jonas123 is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:41 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Programs: Executive Club: Gold - Flying Blue: Gold
Posts: 1,382
Originally Posted by PAL62V
Interesting direction this thread has moved. Although I sympathise with the comments about Qatar's cheaper workforce and whether their rights are as strongly upheld as crew from 'western' countries, I fail to see how QR's possible advantage in this is any excuse for BA (or many other airlines) to be unable to at least offer similar quality food, dine-on-demand, cleaner toilets and a superior hard product. Perhaps it's a fair comment that BA would find it hard to match the number of CC and keep costs down but in so many other areas they could match QR if they wanted. It's not as if BA's fares are really any cheaper than QR.
I do have to agree with this. As an Y passenger most of the times, there are a few things that BA could learn not only from QR, but also from AF, DL, CX, AY and AA.

On QR and CX, you always gave someone coming to your seat and introducing him/herself to you. They thank you for being an Emerald OW member and tell you not to hesitate if you need something. On QR, they would ask me my meal choice from the menu. They will make sure you’ll have your furst choice even if you are the last one to be served. Menus are still printed for Y passengers in all airlines I travel with in longhaul Y (only BA doesn’t. And most of the times BA CC would ask you to chose between Chicken or Pasta without knowing exactly what the dishes are. ). In KL and AF, there are rounds of refreshing towels for Y passengers. KL have them warm. And let’s not talk about eye shades. They are in all airlines except BA. AF have introduced a set of eyshades with different patterns to collect. A nice small touch that lake you feel they care about Y passengers. DL and QR have great amenty kits with eyeshades, ear plugs and socks. DL gives you 2 snacks with your first drink before the main meal. AF’s headsets are real headsets. Cabins are clean on all airlines mentioned here, whereas BA’s are hit and miss. Obviously, all these airlines are more generous with their shorthaul Y offering. You always get something for free. AF have just introduced a new breakfast box on flights longer than 2h that include quality items such as a bread with jam, mango smoothy, almond milk with banana and cinnamon and some granola (picture below). Even when there is BoB, you get recognized for being a FF with other airlines. Cabin crews might be better in higher cabins but find BA crews average now in Y longhaul. In shorthaul there us no customer service at all.

So the list is long. And it does not necessarily have to do with QR being from an oil rich country.
wyvern and haroon145 like this.

Last edited by BA6948; Feb 3, 2019 at 12:52 pm
BA6948 is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:44 pm
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,139
The moral dimension may be challenging to some. From our POV we are quite content to fly QR, but are 99.99% certain we will never visit a country in that region for various reasons.
passy777 and icegirl like this.
T8191 is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 12:59 pm
  #44  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, HHonors Gold
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by T8191
From our POV we are quite content to fly QR, but are 99.99% certain we will never visit a country in that region for various reasons.
I work in the region very occasionally but wouldn’t choose to visit there beyond transferring if I can possibly help it.
rosswill is offline  
Old Feb 3, 2019, 6:51 pm
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: BOS/UTH
Programs: AA LT PLT; QR GLD; Bonvoy LT TIT
Posts: 12,742
Originally Posted by rosswill
Overall it felt like a first class service provided in business class seats.
Exactly what AAB said the goal was when he first announced that QSuites were being developed (but he didn't reveal the name of the product). He said that he was developing a business class which would be as good as or better than first class on other carriers, thus eliminating the need for a first class cabin.


Originally Posted by windowontheAside
I'm curious about escorting every J passenger to their seat.- how is that possible without a lot of crew or holding up boarding?
As pointed out, there do seem to be more crew in J than on BA and other carriers.


Originally Posted by nancypants
Must say, my only J experience on QR I found the “soft product” quite cloying and unhelpful- escort to seat (pointless), bombarding me with 1000 questions about pre departure drinks while I was trying to stash my carry on (of course no help with that, not that I needed it), then I ordered a non alcoholic drink with y meal and had to be asked 3 times if I was aware it was non alcoholic and was that ok? Insufferable
The questions with which you are being "bombard"[ed] are things like, "Would you like a hot or cold towel?" "May I offer you something to drink?" "What size pajamas?" Would you prefer that hot and cold damp towels, PDBs and pajamas not be offered?


Originally Posted by Discus
Enjoy being asked about drinks whet it is time for them (at BA), not deciding what pre-departure drink and wine I want before I have sat down in my seat and hardly looked at the menu.
You have to look at a menu before deciding on a PDB?


Originally Posted by JimEddie
... my thoughts as follows:
At no point was there personal escorting to the seats despite the higher crewax ratio
I fly QR J a lot, and have never not been escorted to my seat.

Originally Posted by JimEddie
The crew themselves largely came across as robotic, dealing only with prepared questions and struggling with anything else
Although smiling consistently, they're definitely not as friendly and warm as on, say, CX or AA. I think that some of that may be cultural. I think that in the M.E., society is more stratified.

Originally Posted by JimEddie
The pace of service was glacial, to the point where on a DOH - DEL sector they weren't able to complete the meal service.
Sometimes. IME that's the rare exception.

Originally Posted by JimEddie
The quality of the food was mixed. On the LHR sectors it was absolutely fine, on the DEL sectors I'd say it was almost on a par with some AA domestic first food.
The only consistently sub-par food I've had in QR J is the lamb, which I always order because I love lamb, and it's always overcooked and tough. The soups, OTOH, I find quite good on QR, often at restaurant quality. And I like the restaurant-style (i.e., F style) service, compared to AA's putting down a tray in front of you which contains everything.


Originally Posted by PAL62V
Just did four sectors in QR J - the first time ever. I can say without reservation that I felt like an F passenger in quality ....
Exactly what AAB was going for, as above.


Originally Posted by HIDDY
To be honest the Middle East is not an area of the world that attracts me so I personally would avoid having to stopover/connect there...especially from here.
But you're not really in the Middle East when you're on a connection, are you? You're in an airport.


Originally Posted by Duck1981
I think nowadays BA could learn even from AA
I gather that you haven't flown AA recently.


Originally Posted by jonas123
QR have the luxury of being based in Qatar and having access to a cheap workforce ....
Sort of. Cabin crew are recruited from all over the world. Presumably you're talking about ground cleaning staff and the like.


Originally Posted by Cap'n Benj
a friend worked for them (back office) and while he really enjoyed the work, there were a load of very strict rules and things you most certainly were not allowed to say, or at least shouldn’t say if you values your job
You didn't say what the rules are, but depending on the specific rules, is that really so different from other airlines?
PilgrimsProgress likes this.
Dr. HFH is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.