Some thoughts - Lufthansa vs BA business class
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: BA executive club Gold, United milage plus Gold
Posts: 58
Some thoughts - Lufthansa vs BA business class
I did several trips last year in BA CW from the US to India and I just completed a similar trip in Lufthansa business class. A few notes while my thoughts are fresh on this topic:
- My BA segments were all on 787 (both -8 and -9) or 777. The LH segments were either A350 or A330.
- The business class seats were identical in both A330 and A350 on LH
- My order of preference is BA 787 > Lufthansa (A330 or A350) > BA 777
- BA unrenovated 777s are simply not competitive
- The 2-3-2 seating pattern in BA CW is by far my favorite
- BA seats are actually more comfortable overall and have more privacy
- On LH, I found that I could not help but see what he person in adjacent seat was watching on his IFE - this is distracting
- LH seat controls were nicer
- LH seats have a nice little hook to hold glasses when sleeping
- LH has a 2-2-2 seating pattern which makes things very awkward for the window seat passengers
- The LH lounge in EWR was definitely nicer than the BA lounge
- Service and food were similar
- On LH, I connected in MUC - which was a good experience since there is no need to go through security - unlike LHR T5. I didn't have much time to enjoy the lounge in MUC but it seemed decent. The BA T5 lounge is enormous in comparison but feels packed even so.
- For some reason, BA was not price competitive this trip so I picked LH but I think I will stick to BA next time
#3
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Berkshire
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold, GGL/CCR, Hilton Diamond, Accor Plat, Pucci Fan Club
Posts: 1,779
- LH seats have a nice little hook to hold glasses when sleeping
#4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: A hop, skip and jump away from MAN.
Programs: BAEC Gold, ex-VS Gold, ex-UA Gold, Premier Inn Platinum-Iridium
Posts: 1,114
This is always something that has set LH J seats apart for this wearer of face-furniture. For as long as I can remember, even when they had the angled lie-flat seats - where it was a little moleskin-lined cubby, LH always had somewhere handy to stick your glasses on the Long Haul J seat.
I guess this is a cultural thing - in Britain we rib people as "speccy four-eyes" for wearing glasses, and so our glasses are swept under the carpet, or in this case, lost, adrift in the seat mechanism.
I guess this is a cultural thing - in Britain we rib people as "speccy four-eyes" for wearing glasses, and so our glasses are swept under the carpet, or in this case, lost, adrift in the seat mechanism.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
#7
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Roswell, GA
Programs: AA EXP 2.8m,Lifetime PLT, Hilton Diamond, IHG PlLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 3,191
Overall I find the BA CW (777 or 747) easy to sleep on ..
Upper deck is by far the best in a beautiful plane.
Privacy can be an issue, but personal storage in and around the seat , that has to be addressed
Upper deck is by far the best in a beautiful plane.
Privacy can be an issue, but personal storage in and around the seat , that has to be addressed
#8
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: BA - Blue > Bronze > Silver > Bronze > Blue
Posts: 6,812
Very nice First Class though (although in my one experience not as far ahead as BA F as people make out)
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK.
Programs: SQ LPPS, A3 *G, BA Silver aiming for Bronze
Posts: 1,506
For me neither offers a competitive hard product in business but I would choose the A350 in front of the 787 on any occasion and for me the LH soft product is superior and in particular catering from MUC.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Their LH haul business class seat is a bigger joke than CW, their short haul business class is at best on par with Club Europe. Their buisness class lounges make Galleries shine.
Very nice First Class though (although in my one experience not as far ahead as BA F as people make out)
#11
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC GGL/GFl, HH Diamond, BW Diamond, Virgin Voyages Deep Blue Extra, Blue Peter Badge Holder
Posts: 3,937
Ive not flown LG for a decade, it was ok last time I flew them, would fly them again on the right route for a decent price.
#12
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,464
I largely agree with the OP's summary - it is balanced and factual. However, when there are F upgrades going (via either upgrade instruments or OpUps), you want to be on LH.
In saying that, if I wanted to be on a LH Group J product, it would have to be LX for me - far better than BA and LH J products hands down.
In saying that, if I wanted to be on a LH Group J product, it would have to be LX for me - far better than BA and LH J products hands down.
#13
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: BA - Blue > Bronze > Silver > Bronze > Blue
Posts: 6,812
#14
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: Battleaxe Alliance
Posts: 22,127
My parents emailed me after their recent LH flight on their A340 in J, "Good service, and decent food. But the seats are rather narrow, aren't they?"
They're actually thin, and I have no idea why they found the seat to be narrow to be honest, but that's the impression they got.
They're actually thin, and I have no idea why they found the seat to be narrow to be honest, but that's the impression they got.
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2018
Programs: BA executive club Gold, United milage plus Gold
Posts: 58
I largely agree with the OP's summary - it is balanced and factual. However, when there are F upgrades going (via either upgrade instruments or OpUps), you want to be on LH.
In saying that, if I wanted to be on a LH Group J product, it would have to be LX for me - far better than BA and LH J products hands down.
In saying that, if I wanted to be on a LH Group J product, it would have to be LX for me - far better than BA and LH J products hands down.