Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > British Airways | Executive Club
Reload this Page >

19 reasons to fly with British Airways in 2019

19 reasons to fly with British Airways in 2019

Old Jan 7, 2019, 3:11 am
  #76  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,394
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
..................................... The way it works is WT and First covers costs, WTP and CW provides the gross margin as a massive over-simplification.
Hi c-w-s, I think your ‘massive over-simplification’ is a very significant caveat, because I do believe there are many fine layers within this complex subject (and the picture can of course vary a lot depending on route and variable pricing etc.)

Some years I had a spell of b2b commercial / marketing dealings with BA, and I distinctly recall one of their senior bods (who I felt certain would have had privileged knowledge at the time) telling me that on, say, the average transatlantic sector, a service which had EVERY F and CW seat filled at ‘normal’ revenue rates would be profitable, and that it didn’t matter if the whole of economy was empty (the latter, he added, was something of an exaggeration to make a point).

I know you have a lot of helpful insider personal contacts, so your info will be more current than mine.


subject2load is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 3:17 am
  #77  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Blue, BAEC Gold, Blockbuster Video card
Posts: 1,378
Originally Posted by subject2load


Hi c-w-s, I think your ‘massive over-simplification’ is a very significant caveat, because I do believe there are many fine layers within this complex subject (and the picture can of course vary a lot depending on route and variable pricing etc.)

Some years I had a spell of b2b commercial / marketing dealings with BA, and I distinctly recall one of their senior bods (who I felt certain would have had privileged knowledge at the time) telling me that on, say, the average transatlantic sector, a service which had EVERY F and CW seat filled at ‘normal’ revenue rates would be profitable, and that it didn’t matter if the whole of economy was empty (the latter, he added, was something of an exaggeration to make a point).

I know you have a lot of helpful insider personal contacts, so your info will be more current than mine.


Additionally one would surmise that there must have been a commercial imperative for the 86J-ification of the 747 fleet or why do it?
Pascoe is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 3:22 am
  #78  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,711
Originally Posted by subject2load
Hi c-w-s, I think your ‘massive over-simplification’ is a very significant caveat, because I do believe there are many fine layers within this complex subject (and the picture can of course vary a lot depending on route and variable pricing etc.)
You are certainly correct to highlight that caveat, and your point about some transatlantic sectors is, was and will be probably correct too, I'm thinking specifically NYC, LAX, SFO, where CW in particular is probably all that matters. But there is second layer for transatlantics - India is traditionally second or third best market, but it isn't point to point traffic, it's all those Toronto or Dallas to Bangalore sort of flights that matter. TLV and South Africa are also in the top 5 on a similar basis. And that's where WTP becomes hugely important, First not at all important. Air France worked this out some time ago, but BA seems to have a broader take on the issue. But yes, you can't run an airline of BA's complexity of the basis of these broad statements, there are many fine layers.
Pascoe likes this.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 3:55 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,394
Thanks for coming back c-w-s. Interesting points.

There are indeed so many variables, as you highlight. I guess this all deserves a thread of its own so I don’t wish to take this particular one too far OT.

But just a little anecdote by way of illustration of the surrounding complexities : at a travel industry reception some time ago, I was party to an informal chat where somebody took perverse delight in telling a commercial manager employed by the carrier he had just travelled with, that there were so few passengers on his flight that “there is no way you can make money like that ....” The manager asked calmly what the route was, and then responded by saying “hmm .... low passenger loads are never ideal, but that particular route just happens to be our best performer in terms of cargo revenue”. So .... yes .... many layers, of which many folk can often be unaware.

subject2load is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 4:02 am
  #80  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by V10
I don't completely buy that argument - BA chopped Y soft product significantly prior to that (remember the infamous ambient snack pass instead of a second meal) and it was more of a face-saving PR exercise to restore the status quo.

I have four questions (long haul obvs)

1. is it full sized magnum or a mini one?
2. Are they given out?
3. are the snacks in the galley available to Y passengers? I have never seen that ever in my years of flying
4. is the 2nd meal an actual substantial meal (i mean, i would be happy with a sandwich and a packet of crisps at this point) or is it back to the pathetic soreen bar (once i wasnt even offered that when other passengers were).This makes both uniteds offerings and AAs offerings of a second snack look like im sat in first class.
MiraculousM is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 4:08 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, EK Skywards (enhanced Blue !), Oman Air Sindbad Gold
Posts: 6,394
Originally Posted by Pascoe
Additionally one would surmise that there must have been a commercial imperative for the 86J-ification of the 747 fleet or why do it?
Undoubtedly there will be, but no specialist info of my own on that.
subject2load is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 4:20 am
  #82  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,711
Originally Posted by MiraculousM
1. is it full sized magnum or a mini one?
2. Are they given out?
3. are the snacks in the galley available to Y passengers? I have never seen that ever in my years of flying
4. is the 2nd meal an actual substantial meal (i mean, i would be happy with a sandwich and a packet of crisps at this point) or is it back to the pathetic soreen bar (once i wasnt even offered that when other passengers were).This makes both uniteds offerings and AAs offerings of a second snack look like im sat in first class.
I think this is probably the thread you haven't seen yet:
WT Improvements

There are photos in it illustrating the current offering. To answer the questions, they are Magnum Minis, they are given out on day time flights departing London (but not night time flights or those returning to London), there are snacks in the rear galley, and as previously advised the second meal is a box with something like a chicken sandwich plus cake slice if going (e.g.) to East Coast USA.
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 4:25 am
  #83  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Blue, BAEC Gold, Blockbuster Video card
Posts: 1,378
@cws - Please confirm that this is the year you will appear on Mastermind, with BA SOPs as your chosen specialised subject.

I can't see anything other than a win ;-)
Pascoe is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 5:17 am
  #84  
Ambassador: World of Hyatt
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK - the nearest airport is named after a motorway !
Posts: 4,229
Originally Posted by lcylocal
I feel a little bad being critical of this point as I think there are some good things in this list as a whole.

But a little suprised about this one:
  • It is surely just a reminder about lack of preparedness for the snow chaos last year;
  • I would hope most of this investment is now in place given we are now back in winter and there has been months to learn lessons (this could be just an issue with the tenses here, and this has already happened);
  • BA could have been more honest at the time that they didn’t have enough kit when IIRC they were very quiet and somewhat pressing the blame on HAL. And in doing so should have paid EU compensation claims with many less quibbles (I believe they have now lost their argument about extraordinary circumstances now in court so claims should be being paid?)
I'm with lcylocal that this point may come back to bite BA on the arse in more ways than one...

But for the highlighted bit, is that correct? I was hit by 'slushmaggedon' in Dec 17, when BA57 was cancelled just as I pulled up at T5, with not a snowflake in the sky or a scraping of slush on the pavements... can I claim?
Stewie Mac is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 5:59 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
I think this is probably the thread you haven't seen yet:
WT Improvements

There are photos in it illustrating the current offering. To answer the questions, they are Magnum Minis, they are given out on day time flights departing London (but not night time flights or those returning to London), there are snacks in the rear galley, and as previously advised the second meal is a box with something like a chicken sandwich plus cake slice if going (e.g.) to East Coast USA.
I did miss this! thank you!!!
MiraculousM is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 7:00 am
  #86  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Programs: Mucci Blue, BAEC Gold, Blockbuster Video card
Posts: 1,378
Originally Posted by rockflyertalk
I thought this is already here..on the NEO's?
Dunno - I reckon I'll be on an A321 on Monday morning, not sure if that's a NEO or not (I find these little single aisle airbus things a bit dull so I never bothered to read up on all the type variant nuances). Maybe I should now the 767s are retired....

I'll report back if I see one.

On an unrelated note I still haven't seen another FTer's scrawl on the cover of the inflight magazine. Are people still playing that?
Pascoe is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 7:11 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 610
Originally Posted by Pascoe
On an unrelated note I still haven't seen another FTer's scrawl on the cover of the inflight magazine. Are people still playing that?
What is this because i want in!
MiraculousM is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 7:24 am
  #88  
Ambassador: World of Hyatt
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: UK - the nearest airport is named after a motorway !
Posts: 4,229
Originally Posted by Pascoe
On an unrelated note I still haven't seen another FTer's scrawl on the cover of the inflight magazine. Are people still playing that?
Originally Posted by MiraculousM
What is this because i want in!
this
Stewie Mac is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 7:38 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 86
Originally Posted by SpeedbirdLHR
There is indeed a mock up but it isn't in Waterside and very few people have had access to it, including people working on the new aircraft who have been given general information but not allowed to see the seat. Crew access to the seat will come in a few months.
Crikey! Why all the secrecy? It's just a seat at the end of the day. Unless it is something totally revolutionary and they want to announce it with a big fanfare without any leaks, aren't HQ going a bit over OTT with keeping the details on the down low?
Contrast is offline  
Old Jan 7, 2019, 9:10 am
  #90  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Programs: BA, U2+, SK, AF/KL, IHG, Hilton, others gathering dust...
Posts: 2,551
Originally Posted by Contrast
It's just a seat at the end of the day.
Blimey, you can't be saying stuff like that on this forum...

Originally Posted by Contrast
Unless it is something totally revolutionary and they want to announce it with a big fanfare without any leaks, aren't HQ going a bit over OTT with keeping the details on the down low?
The seat not being revolutionary will not stop the BA marketing department presenting it as such. Expect lots of fanfare and claims of innovation that are likely to be significantly divorced from reality. The seat might still be a good one, depending on your point of view, and the reality is that many of us will have sat on it, or something very close to it, on another airline, we just don't know which one yet...
Silver Fox and subject2load like this.
Oaxaca is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.