Non Revenue pax in CE jump seat on LGW A320
#16
Moderator: Qatar Airways
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: LHR/NCE/MIA
Programs: BAEC GfL & GGL, SQ Gold, Amex Centurion, Mucci des Chevaliers des Bons Mots et Qui Savent Moucher
Posts: 8,947
Out of curiosity, were they there for the whole flight, or just while the rear galley was being heavily used?
M
M
#17
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Scotland
Programs: BA silver
Posts: 1,850
9
For goodness sake- do not highlight it to BA, you will just give them ideas!
I’d be mightily annoyed. 1A/C are awkward enough at takeoff and landing on these aircraft so facing someone through the whole flight would be terrible. Tbh I try and avoid these seats, despite the legroom, for this reason.
I think it’s definitely worth highlighting this to BA so it is less likely to happen again.
I think it’s definitely worth highlighting this to BA so it is less likely to happen again.
For goodness sake- do not highlight it to BA, you will just give them ideas!
#18
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 264
The point that I raised originally - that it's the Captain's call - really makes writing an email to customer service, or trying to "make sure it doesn't happen again", a waste of time and energy.
Most flight crew fly standby when they are commuting, or going on holiday; and when a flight is full and there are no more flights that day and they want to get to their destination - well, they know the deal, and they hope that their fellow staff are kind enough to let them board. So don't expect any change in policy.
Moreover, non rev passengers only use jump seats when no other seats in any cabin are available (hence the OP's inability to move to another seat - because there wasn't any).
Most flight crew fly standby when they are commuting, or going on holiday; and when a flight is full and there are no more flights that day and they want to get to their destination - well, they know the deal, and they hope that their fellow staff are kind enough to let them board. So don't expect any change in policy.
Moreover, non rev passengers only use jump seats when no other seats in any cabin are available (hence the OP's inability to move to another seat - because there wasn't any).
#19
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Programs: BA Blue, IC Spire Ambassador
Posts: 5,227
The point that I raised originally - that it's the Captain's call - really makes writing an email to customer service, or trying to "make sure it doesn't happen again", a waste of time and energy.
Most flight crew fly standby when they are commuting, or going on holiday; and when a flight is full and there are no more flights that day and they want to get to their destination - well, they know the deal, and they hope that their fellow staff are kind enough to let them board. So don't expect any change in policy.
Moreover, non rev passengers only use jump seats when no other seats in any cabin are available (hence the OP's inability to move to another seat - because there wasn't any).
Most flight crew fly standby when they are commuting, or going on holiday; and when a flight is full and there are no more flights that day and they want to get to their destination - well, they know the deal, and they hope that their fellow staff are kind enough to let them board. So don't expect any change in policy.
Moreover, non rev passengers only use jump seats when no other seats in any cabin are available (hence the OP's inability to move to another seat - because there wasn't any).
Can this be factually right though? Does an A320 have jumpseat space in the cabin for 6? IE is there seating for 4 at the back? The 320 would have had a minimum of 4 operating cabin crew. Are there not 2 spare seats on the flight deck? I wonder whether they were sat there for takeoff and landing.
#21
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 587
Can this be factually right though? Does an A320 have jumpseat space in the cabin for 6? IE is there seating for 4 at the back? The 320 would have had a minimum of 4 operating cabin crew. Are there not 2 spare seats on the flight deck? I wonder whether they were sat there for takeoff and landing.
#22
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,596
I think the point here was that they were originally in another jumpseat at the back but were moved because they were in the way! It’s not occupying a jumpseat per se that is the issue, it’s that they were sat in the double jumpseat by D1L during cruise, and facing business class customers in 1A and C that was the issue - that’s the way I read the OP’s issue. The jumpseat at D1L would be occupied by the SCCM and another crew member for takeoff and landing - ie it’s not spare.
Can this be factually right though? Does an A320 have jumpseat space in the cabin for 6? IE is there seating for 4 at the back? The 320 would have had a minimum of 4 operating cabin crew. Are there not 2 spare seats on the flight deck? I wonder whether they were sat there for takeoff and landing.
Unless they are flight deck authorised they cannot sit there. There are many more staff than those few authorised to sit in the flight deck.
Last edited by NWIFlyer; Sep 22, 2018 at 2:20 am Reason: Fix quote box
#23
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: HKG
Programs: BA GGL & CCR
Posts: 600
It’s amazing to me that people will wax lyrically or scoff at the entitlement of someone that nudges ahead in a queue or places a bag on a spare seat.
And nod their head in agreement at someone exclaiming DYKWIA, I’m a PAYING club passenger with ROW 1 gold privileges and they dared sit someone in my field of vision!
And nod their head in agreement at someone exclaiming DYKWIA, I’m a PAYING club passenger with ROW 1 gold privileges and they dared sit someone in my field of vision!
#24
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Manchester but from Yorkshire better known as Gods country
Programs: BA Gold, , Sandals plat
Posts: 839
It’s amazing to me that people will wax lyrically or scoff at the entitlement of someone that nudges ahead in a queue or places a bag on a spare seat.
And nod their head in agreement at someone exclaiming DYKWIA, I’m a PAYING club passenger with ROW 1 gold privileges and they dared sit someone in my field of vision!
And nod their head in agreement at someone exclaiming DYKWIA, I’m a PAYING club passenger with ROW 1 gold privileges and they dared sit someone in my field of vision!
#25
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Programs: BA Blue, IC Spire Ambassador
Posts: 5,227
I just think they should put a bulkhead (and wardrobe) in. From a crew’s perspective, some sectors from LGW can be quite long. Presumably crew might want to take a break / have a meal and they either have to go to the back (and be interrupted by ET using the toilet) or sit at the front staring at the cabin. Try taking a break in plain view of customers. It doesn’t make for a happy combination. Might be ok for a LCC but CE is a premium cabin. I don’t blame the operating crew on the day - they have to make do with what they’ve got.
#26
Fontaine d'honneur du Flyertalk
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Morbihan, France
Programs: Reine des Muccis de Pucci; Foreign Elitist (according to others)
Posts: 19,172
I actually agree with the OP. I rather suspect that they were moved up the front so they were watered if not fed from the CE galley. I suspect that CE was full. Whether ET was remains to be seen. The CSM clearly was being defensive until she realised that you were hopping mad. I suspect that I know who it might have been. Was she blond and East European? I say this because I had an issue with her as she couldn’t understand why her handbag up in the overhead lockers was a problem. That apart, she was lovely I have to say. Naturally, all the storage space in the bulkhead has gone as well, so I do have some sympathy.
Those non-bulkhead seats cause problems with people queuing for the toilet. What makes me maddest 😡 of all are crew bags in the forward compartments as I have said. If she had said that to me, I’d have said that there’s space down the back where she must have spent take-off, just because there’s no room for you to put her, don’t dump her on us. Her role and ours is different, we pay full whack. She most likely doesn’t. When I flew I never went stand-by even in the last years when I commuted from Nice. I always paid HI and my fares for own travel as neither of us would travel Space Available.
Complain away. It’s not good enough.
Those non-bulkhead seats cause problems with people queuing for the toilet. What makes me maddest 😡 of all are crew bags in the forward compartments as I have said. If she had said that to me, I’d have said that there’s space down the back where she must have spent take-off, just because there’s no room for you to put her, don’t dump her on us. Her role and ours is different, we pay full whack. She most likely doesn’t. When I flew I never went stand-by even in the last years when I commuted from Nice. I always paid HI and my fares for own travel as neither of us would travel Space Available.
Complain away. It’s not good enough.
#27
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: BA Blue, EI Silver, Honours Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,207
easyJet do have a partition (no wardrobe) and 186Y seats on their A320s (177 on GATx), so it can be done with 29” pitch throughout.
There must be a trade off - a partition means less legroom throughout the cabin or fewer seats this higher fares or less profit. The GATx don’t have the spaceflex layout at the rear, like easyJet and the NEOs do. Perhaps in the future BA will shrink the galleys, install a partition and stick an extra row in the back, so LGW A320s could have 183 seats, so be careful what you wish for!
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: JER
Programs: BA Gold/OWE, several MUCCI, and assorted Pensions!
Posts: 32,145
As requested ...
The bit of Galley equipment shown there was temporary, but then the CC have very little Galley space to work with.
The floor area is also used by people queueing to use the forward loo.
The bit of Galley equipment shown there was temporary, but then the CC have very little Galley space to work with.
The floor area is also used by people queueing to use the forward loo.